Skip to main content
Log in

Intrinsic competition betweenApanteles melanoscelus [Hym.: Braconidae] andRogas lymantriae [Hym.: Braconidae] reared onLymantria dispar [Lep.: Lymantriidae]

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the laboratory, competition was determined betweenApanteles melanoscelus Ratzeburg andRogas lymantriae Watanabe by rearing both in the same gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar (L.), hosts. Each parasite attacked larvae previously parasitized by its competitor; neither parasite was excluded by the action of the other, but those that attacked first were more successful. Of 600 competitive interactions tested, only 1 gypsy moth larva yielded both parasite species. Percentage of parasitism was not significantly reduced, which suggests thatA. melanoscelus andR. lymantriae are intrinsically compatible and that establishment ofR. lymantriae in the United States could provide an additional benefit for gypsy moth control.

Résumé

Au laboratoire, la compétition entreApanteles melanoscelus Ratzeburg etRogas lymantriae a été étudiée en élevant les 2 parasites dans la même chenille-hôte,Lymantria dispar (L.). Chacun d'eux attaque les larves déjà parasitées par son compétiteur, aucun parasite n'est exclu par l'action de l'autre mais ce sont ceux qui sont intervenus les premiers qui ont le plus de succès. Au cours des 600 interactions de compétitions réalisées, seule 1 chenille deLymantria renferma les 2 espèces de parasite. Le pourcentage de parasitisme n'a pas été diminué de manière significative, ce qui suggère queA. melanoscelus etR. lymantriae sont compatibles entre eux et que l'établissement aux Etats Unis deR. lymantriae pourrait apporter un auxiliaire complémentaire pour la lutte contreL. dispar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess, A. F. & Crossman, S. S. — 1929. Imported insect enemies of the gypsy moth and brown-tail moth. —U. S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bul., 86, 147 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, S. S. — 1922.Apanteles melanoscelus, an imported parasite of the gipsy (sic) moth. —U. S. Dep. Agric. Bul., 1028, 25 pp.

  • Doutt, R. L. &DeBach, P. — 1964. Some biological control concepts and questions. In: Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. (P. DeBach &E. I. Schlinger, eds.) —Reinhold, New York, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, P. A. &Odell, T. M. — 1979. Laboratory study of the interaction of two parasites ofLymantria dispar [Lep.: Lymantriidae]: Blepharipa pratensis [Dipt.: Tachinidae] andBrachymeria intermedia [Hym.: Chalcididae]. —Entomophaga, 24, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, K. J. — 1976. Interactions betweenPleolophus basizonus andLophyroplectus luteator [Hym.: Ichneumonidae] two parasites ofNeodiprion sertifer [Hym.: Diprionidae]. —Entomophaga, 21, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M. A. — 1976. Establishment of gypsy moth parasitoids in North America. An evaluation of possible reasons for establishment or nonestablishment. In: Perspectives in Forest Entomology. (J. F. Anderson &H. K. Kaya, eds.) —Academic Press, New York, pp. 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F. B. — 1980. Factors affecting assessment of parasitization byApanteles fumiferanae Vier andGlypta fumiferanae (Vier) on spruce budworm larvae. —Can. Entomol., 92, 881–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, T. M. &Rollinson, W. D. — 1966. A technique for rearing the gypsy moth,Porthetria dispar (L.), on an artificial diet. —J. Econ. Entomol., 59, 741–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, D. — 1974. A study of the interactions between the internal larval parasites ofRhyacionia buoliana [Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae]. —Entomophaga, 19, 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh, R. M. — 1976. Discrimination between parasitized and non-parasitized hosts by the gypsy moth larval parasitoid,Apanteles melanoscelus [Hymenoptera: Braconidae]. —Can. Entomol., 108, 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh, R. M. — 1978. Seasonal and spatial mortality patterns ofApanteles melanoscelus due to predators and gypsy moth hyperparasites. —Environ. Entomol., 7, 662–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh, R. M., Wallner, W. E. &Hoy, M. A. — 1979. Possible deleterious effects of releasingAnastatus kashmirensis, a facultative hyperparasite of the gypsy moth. —Environ. Entomol., 8, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallner, W.E., Weseloh, R.M. & Grinberg, P.S. Intrinsic competition betweenApanteles melanoscelus [Hym.: Braconidae] andRogas lymantriae [Hym.: Braconidae] reared onLymantria dispar [Lep.: Lymantriidae] . Entomophaga 27, 99–103 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371942

Keywords

Navigation