Skip to main content
Log in

The parasitoids ofSpodoptera littoralis [Lep.: Noctuidae] and their role in population control in Cyprus

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is based on 20 months survey and laboratory studies of the parasitoids ofSpodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lep.: Noctuidae) carried out in Cyprus in 1971–72. Regular sampling revealed the presence of 19 further macrolepidopterous members of the ecosystem, includingS. exigua (Hbn.),Heliothis spp. and “Plusia” spp. Attacking these were a complex of at least 37 named primary parasitoids and a single secondary parasitoid. The commonest were the ichneumonidHyposoter didymator (Thnb.) and the braconidsChelonus inanitus (L.),Meteorus unicolor (Wesm.) andMicroplitis rufiventris Kok. and notes on their hosts, hostplants and biology are given.

Almost all of the parasitoids were polyphagous and this, together with a wide range of hostplants, appears to improve the carry-over of the parasitoids and permit for greater parasitism of the main pests,S. littoralis andS. exigua. The % parasitism is shown to vary greatly with the situation, being highest in unsprayed lucerne field and unsprayed market gardens, and lowest in potato fields and sprayed vegetable plots.

Recommendations are made for possible reductions in crop spraying, permitting the growth of weeds, under certain conditions, mass-rearing and liberation of an endemic parasitoid (C. inanitus) and filling gaps in the parasite complex by the introduction of exotic parasitoids.

Résumé

Cet article a pour base 20 mois de prospection et d'études en laboratoire des parasitoïdes deSpodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) à Chypre en 1971–72.

Un échantillonnage régulier a révélé la présence de 19 autres macrolépidoptères faisant partie de l'écosystème, notammentS. exigua (Hbn.),Heliothis spp. et «Plusia». Ils sont attaqués par au moins 37 parasitoïdes primaires déterminés et par un seul parasitoïde secondaire. On donne de brèves indications sur leurs hôtes, leur fréquence, leurs plantes-hôtes et leur biologie. Les plus courants sont l'ichneumonideHyposoter didymator (Thnb.) et les braconides,Chelonus inanitus (L.),Meteorus unicolor (Wesm.) etMicroplitis rufiventris Kok.

Presque tous les parasitoïdes sont polyphages et avec une large gamme de plantes-hôtes, ce qui semble améliorer la survie des parasitoïdes et permettre davantage de parasitisme des ravageurs principaux,S. littoralis etS. exigua. Le % de parasitisme varie considérablement suivant la situation; on trouve le plus élevé dans les champs de luzerne non traités et dans les cultures maraîchères non traitées et le plus bas dans les champs de pommes de terre et dans les cultures de légumes traitées.

On recommande de réduire autant que possible les pulvérisations des cultures, de laisser pousser les mauvaises herbes, dans certaines conditions, de réaliser l'élevage en masse et la libération d'un parasitoïde endémique (C. inanitus) et de combler les lacunes du complexe parasitaire par l'introduction de parasitoïdes exotiques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altahtawy, M. M., El-Sawaf, S. M. &Shalaby, F. F. — 1972. Studies on morphology and development of the immature stages ofMicroplitis rufiventris Kokujev [Hym.: Bracon.]. —Z. Angew. Entomol., 71, 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altahtawy, M. M., Hammad, S. M. &Hegazi, E. M. — 1976. Studies on the dependence ofMicroplitis rufiventris Kok. [Hym.: Braconidae] parasitizingSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) on own food as well as food of its host. —Z. Angew. Entomol., 81, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.I.B.C. — 1978. Report of work carried out January 1977–March 1978. —Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control., Commonw. Agric. Bureaux, Farnum Royal, Slough, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutt, R. L. &DeBach, P. — 1964. Some biological control concepts and questions. In: Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds (P. DeBach ed.). —Chapman & Hall, Lond., 118–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, L. E. &van den Bosch, R. — 1974. An analytsis of the natural biological control ofTrichoplusia ni [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] on cotton in California. —Can. Entomol., 106, 1067–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, D. — 1969. The parasites ofSpodoptera littoralis Boisd. [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] eggs and larvae in Israel. —Israel J. Entomol., 4, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • — — 1971. Occurrence, abundance and efficiency of some local parasitoids attackingSpodoptera littoralis [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] in selected cotton fields in Israel. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 64, 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, M. — 1951. Notes on the introduction and biology ofMicroplitis demolitor Wilk. [Hymen., Braconidae]. —Bull. Soc. Fouad I er Entomol., 35, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammad, S. M., El-Minshawy, A. M. &Salama, A. — 1965. Studies onMicroplitis rufiventris Kok. [Hymenoptera: Braconidae]. —Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte, 49, 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegazi, E. M., Hammad, S. M., Altahtawy, M. &El-Sawaf, S. K. — 1973. Parasites of the larval stage of the cotton leaf-wormSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) [Noctuidae, Lepidoptera] in Alexandria region. —Z. Angew. Entomol., 74, 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegazi, E. M., Altahtawy, M. M., Hammad, S. M. &El-Sawaf, S. K. — 1974. Notes on the biology ofChelonus inanitus (L.) [Hymen., Braconidae]. —Z. Angew. Entomol., 75, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegazi, E. M., Hammad, S. M. &El-Minshawy, A. M. — 1977. Field and laboratory observations on the parasitoids ofSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) [Lep.: Noctuidae] in Alexandria. —Z. Angew. Entomol., 84, 316–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herting, B. — 1976. A Catalogue of Parasites and Predators of Terrestrial Arthropods. Section A: Host or prey/enemy. Volume VII Lepidoptera, Part 2 (Macrolepidoptera). —Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control., Commonw. Agric. Bureaux, Farnum Royal, Slough, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, W. R. — 1975. Improving control of the vegetable armyworm. —PANS, 21, 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, M. — 1951. The biological control of the cotton leaf-worm (Prodenia litura F.) in Egypt. —Bull. Soc. Fouad I er Entomol., 35, 221–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechav, Y. — 1974. Effects of common insecticides applied to cotton on adults of a braconid parasitoid,Chelonus inanitus (L.). —Environ. Entomol., 3, 737–738.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — — 1975. Biological and ecological studies of the parasitoidChelonus inanitus [Hym.: Braconidae] in Israel. I. Distribution, abundance and parasitism in natural host populations. —Entomophaga, 20, 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — — 1976. Biological and ecological studies of the parasitoidChelonus inanitus (L.) [Hymenoptera: Braconidae] in Israel. II. Releases of adults in a cotton field. —J. Entomol. Soc. South Afr., 39, 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechav, Y. &Orion, T. — 1975. The development of the immature stages ofChelonus inanitus. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 68, 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. — 1953. A Catalogue of the Parasites and Predators of Insect Pests. Section 2. Host parasite catalogue. Part 2. Hosts of the Hymenoptera [Agaonidae toBraconidae]. —Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control., Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • — — 1957. A Catalogue of the Parasites and Predators of Insect Pests. Section 2. Host parasite catalogue. Part 4. Hosts of the Hymenoptera [Ichneumonidae]. —Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control., Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ingram, W.R. The parasitoids ofSpodoptera littoralis [Lep.: Noctuidae] and their role in population control in Cyprus. Entomophaga 26, 23–37 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371831

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371831

Keywords

Navigation