Skip to main content
Log in

Reciprocal host-parasite relations as exemplified byChrysomphalus aonidum [Homoptera: Diaspididae] andPteroptrix smithi [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]

  • Mémoires Originaux
  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The parasitePteroptrix smithi (Compere) prefers to oviposit in hosts (Chrysomphalus aonidum L.) that are at least 5 weeks old. Parasitization of two week old hosts is possible, but only few parasites reach maturity, and the developmental duration is lengthened by about one third. The sex ratio with both large and small hosts was usually 1∶2, whereas the average number of emerging parasites varied from 1.9 for 2 week old hosts to 3–4 for 5 week old ones. Non-ovipositing scales that are attacked by the parasite will fail to reproduce and ovipositing ones will only produce part of their potential progeny. Other externally observable changes in the young parasitized host include the formation of a thinner scale cover that differs in coloration and size from the normal one.

Résumé

Le parasitePteroptrix smithi (Compere) pond de préférence dans des hôtes (Chrysomphalus aonidum) âgés d'au moins 5 semaines. Le parasitisme d'hôtes de 2 semaines est possible mais peu de parasites vont jusqu'à la maturité et la durée de développement est augmentée d'environ un tiers. Le rapport des sexes est en général de 1∶2 quelle que soit la taille de l'hôte, par contre le nombre moyen de parasites qui sortent varie de 1,9 chez des cochenilles de 2 semaines à 3 ou 4 chez celles de 5 semaines.

Les cochenilles qui ne sont pas encore prêtes à pondre ne se reproduisent pas lorsqu'elles sont parasitées et celles qui sont en cours de ponte ne donnent plus naissance qu`à une fraction de leur descendance potentielle. Chez les hôtes parasités jeunes le bouclier est plus fin et d'une coloration et d'une taille différentes de la normale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, A. P. &Wylie, H. G. — 1959. Effects of host size on sex ratio, development time and size ofPimpla turionellae [Hym. Ichneumonidae]Entomophaga,4, 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. P. — 1939. The effects of host size upon the sex ratio of hymenopterous parasites and its relation to methods of rearing and colonization. —J. N. Y. Ent. Soc.,47, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutt, R. L. — 1959. The biology of parasiticHymenoptera. —Ann. Rev. Ent.,4, 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, S. E. — 1946. Control of sex and sex-limited polymorphism in theHymenoptera. —Quart. Rev. Biol.,21, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. — 1940. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VII. The effects of different hosts on the parasiteTrichogramma evanescens Westw. [Hym. Chalcidoidea]. —Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. London A.,15, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbert, H. — 1965. Die Auswirkungen der Körpergrösse vonAphelinus semiflavus Howard [Hym. Aphelinidae] auf einige Organe und ihre Leistungsfähigkeit. —Z. Morph. Oekol. Tiere,55, 804–834.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerling, D., Bar, D. Reciprocal host-parasite relations as exemplified byChrysomphalus aonidum [Homoptera: Diaspididae] andPteroptrix smithi [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae] . Entomophaga 16, 37–44 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370687

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370687

Keywords

Navigation