Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of human torso motion with muscle actuators

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A biomechanical model is devised to analyze the motion of the human torso and estimate the load on the lumbar spine, the contraction forces in the trunk muscles, and the sensory signals between the muscle and the nervous system. A state space formulation of three-dimensional (3D) equations of motion of the human torso is presented with muscle forces as input to the system. At least 3 pairs of skeletal muscles are considered to be necessary for 3D motion of human torso. Functional anatomy of these major muscles of the human trunk are discussed. These muscles as well as their feedback and feedforward sensory paths are modeled by linear viscoelastic components and force generators. Stability of the torso with three pairs of muscles is studied both with muscle spindles inactive (open loop) and active (closed loop). Voluntary point-to-point motion of the torso in three-dimensional space is simulated on a digital computer, employing a dynamic controller, where feedback gains are tuned (programmed) by higher centers of nervous system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bejjani, F.J.; Grass, C.M.; Pugh, J.W. Model for static lifting: Relationship of loads on the spine and the knee. J. of Biomechanics 17:281–286; 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Belytsohko, T.B.; Andriacchi, T.P.; Shultz, A.B.; Galante, J.O. Analog studies of forces in the human spine: Computational techniques. J. Biomechanics 6:361–371; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Floyd, W.F.; Silver, P.H.S. Electromyography study of patterns of activity of the anterior abdominal wall muscles in man. J. Anatomy 84:132–145; 1950.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goel, V.K.; Clark, C.R.; McGowan, D.; Goyal, S. An In-vitro study of the kinematics of the normal, injured and stabilized cervical spine. J. of Biomechanics 17:363–376; 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gottlieb, G.L.; Agarwal, G.C.; Startk, L. Studies in postural control systems part II; A muscle spindle model. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 6:127–132; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gunnar, B.J.; Schultz, A.B.; Ortngren, R. Trunk muscle forces during desk work. Ergonomics 29: 1113–1127; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hemami, H.; Katbab, A. Constrained inverted pendulum model for evaluating upright postural stability. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 104:343–349; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan, N. Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 29:681–690; 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Inbar, G.F.; Pinchas, J.J. Analysis of a model of the triceps surae muscle reflex control system. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1:25; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inbar, G.F.; Yafe, A. Parameter and signal adaptation in the stretch reflex loop. Progress in Brain Research 44; 1976.

  11. Katbab, A.; Hemami, H. Role of gain programming in the voluntary movement of the human forearm. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 23:230–236; 1985.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kendall, H.O.; Kendall, F.B.; Wadsworth, G.E.Muscles testing and function, 2nd Ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mathews, P.B.C.; Stein, R.B. The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. J. Physiol. 200:723–743; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morris, J.M., et al. Role of the trunk in stability of the spine. J. of Bone and Joint Surgery 43-A: 327–351; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Panjabi, M.M., et al. A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree of freedom motion of a body joint with an application to the human spine. J. of Biomechanics 14: 447–460; 1981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Panjabi, M.M.; Krag, M.H.; Goel, V.K. Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments, an invitro biomechanical study. Spine 7:192–203; 1982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rash, P.J.; Burke, P.K. Kinesiology and applied anatomy. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger, 5th Ed.; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubins, D.K. The human figure: An anatomy for artists. New York: Viking Press; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schultz, A.B.; Anderson, G.B.J. Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine. Spine 6:76–82; 1981.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultz, A.B., et al. Loads on the lumbar spine. J. of Bone and Joint Surgery 64-A:713–720; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schultz, A.B., et al. Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. Biomechanics 15:669–675; 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schultz, A.B., et al. Analysis and quantitative myoelectric measurements of loads on the lumbar spine when holding weights in standing postures. Spine 7:391–397; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schultz, A.B.; Haderspeck, K.; Warwick, D.; Portillo, D. Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks. J. of Orthopedic Research 1:77–91; 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng, Y.; Hemami, H. Computation of multibody systems dynamics by a multiprocessor scheme. IEEE Trans. on Syst., Man, and Cybernetics 16:102–110; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katbab, A. Analysis of human torso motion with muscle actuators. Ann Biomed Eng 17, 75–91 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02364274

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02364274

Keywords

Navigation