Abstract
The influence of local extirpation of the representation of the forelimb in the motor area of the cortex on the performance of precision elevations of this limb was investigated. Even imprecise avoidance reactions to an acoustic signal did not recover spontaneously. Irregular motoric reactions which were insufficient in amplitude could easily be restored in the course of retraining, but precise movements (both rapid fused, as well as relatively slow stepwise movements) did not recover for at least a half year after the operation. By contrast with this, precise rapid reactions in response to electrical stimulation of a “working” limb (inducing unconditioned reflex flexion) remained essentially preserved, i.e., the capacity to stop the movement in the correct (previously learned) position of the limb was preserved. The capacity to fix the position of the raised limb was not lost, but was persistently impaired. The capacity to overcome the unconditioned reflex flexion during the performance of extensor “slow” escape reaction was reduced sharply and persistently. Limb presentation reactions regulated by vision were essentially spontaneously and nearly completely restored within a month.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O. S. Adrianov and T. A. Mering,Atlas of the Dog Brain [in Russian], Medgiz, Moscow (1959).
N. I. Burlachkova and M. E. Ioffe, “The specific characteristics of nuclear elements of the motor region of the cortex in the organization of the precision motoric reaction,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,28, No. 3, 475 (1978).
T. O. Górska, “The mechanism of influence of the pyramidal pathways on local motoric conditioned reflexes in dogs,” in:Neural and Peripheral Mechanisms of Motoric Activity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966), p. 129.
M. E. Ioffe,Corticospinal Mechanisms of Instrumental Motor Reactions [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1975).
I. B. Kozlovskaya,The Afferent Control of Voluntary Movements [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1976), p. 181.
N. I. Stul, “The role of various types of afferentation in the accomplishment of precision movement in dogs,” in:The Sensory Organization of Movements [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1975), p. 195.
A. G. Frolov, “Spontaneous recovery of precision movement and of fixation of limb position following the extirpation of the somatosensory region of the cortex in dogs,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,38, No. 2, 257 (1988).
A. G. Frolov,Participation of the Somatosensory and Motor Areas of the Cortex in the Control of Precision Instrumental Reactions, Diss ... Cand. Biol. Sciences, In-t VND i NF RAN, Moscow (1990).
A. G. Frolov, M. E. Varga, O. G. Pavlova, and V. N. Mats, “Dynamics of changes in the somatosensory input to the motoric region of the cortex following damage to the somatosensory cortical zones in dogs,”Neirofiziologiya,22, No. 1, 61 (1990).
A. S. Batuev, L. V. Cherenkova, and Yu. A. Yunatov, “Association brain systems and visually guided movements in the cat,”Physiol. Behav.,31, 29 (1983).
C. Dobrzecka, B. Suchowa, and J. Konorski, “The effects of lesions within the sensorimotor cortex upon instrumental response to the ‘specific tactile stimulus’,”Acta Biol. Exper. (Warsaw),25, 91 (1965).
A. G. Frolov, “The effect of instrumentalization of inborn reaction on its transformation into contrary directed escape response in dogs and the problem of reinforcement,”Acta Neurobiol. Exper.,43, No. 1, 1 (1983).
P. Glees and J. Cole, “Recovery of skilled motor functions after small repeated lesions of motor cortex in macaque,”J. Neurophysiol.,13, 137 (1950).
T. Górska, “Functional organization of cortical motor areas in adult dogs and puppies,”Acta Neurobiol. Exper.,34, No. 1, 171 (1974).
R. Hassler and K. Muhs-Clement, “Architektonischer Aufbau des senmonotorischen [sic] und parietalen Cortex der Katze,”J. Hirnforsch.,6, 377 (1964).
M. C. Hepp-Reymond and M. Wiesendanger, “Unilateral pyramidotomy in monkeys: effect on force and speed of a conditioned precision grip,”Brain Res.,36, 117 (1972).
A. Lundberg, “Integration in a propriospinal motor center controlling the forelimb in the cat,” in:Integration in the Nervous System, H. Asanuma and V. J. Wilson (eds.), Igacu Shoin, Tokyo-New York (1979), p. 47.
O. G. Pavlova and A. V. Alexandrov, “Head-forelimb movement coordination and its rearrangement in the course of training in the dog. Role of the motor cortex,” in:The Head-Neck Sensory-Motor System, Ch. 96, A. Berthoz and P. P. Vidal (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1992), p. 100.
I. Stepien, L. Stepien, and J. Konorski, “The effects of bilateral lesions in motor cortex on type II conditioned reflexes in dogs,”Acta Biol. Exper.,20, 211 (1960).
I. Stepien and L. Stepien, “The effects of sensory cortex ablations on instrumental (type II) conditioned reflexes in dogs,”Acta Biol. Exper.,19, 257 (1959).
Additional information
The study has been supported by the Russian Basic Research Fund (Project No. 93-04-6267).
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg. Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 44, No. 4-5, pp. 691–701, July–October, 1994.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frolov, A.G., Mats, V.N. Varied influence of damage to the motor cortex on precision avoidance and escape reactions in dogs. Neurosci Behav Physiol 25, 393–402 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359596
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359596