Skip to main content
Log in

Addressing issues of peer rejection in child-centered classrooms

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many early childhood classrooms, teachers are providing more opportunities for children to interact with peers as they learn. For most children, these interactions are successful. However, for a few children, their attempts to interact with peers are ignored or rebuffed. If interactions are an essential component of the instructional program, then being denied access to them is tantamount to being denied access to learning events. Therefore, the children experience the psychological impact of rejection as well as the impact of being denied access to learning opportunities. This article explores this issue by: (a) describing the sociometric dimension (i.e., interpersonal relationships) within groups, (b) providing illustrations of how the sociometric dynamics in one classroom affected three children, and (c) presenting suggestions for maximizing the learning experiences for all children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, S. R., Markell, R. A., & Hymel, S. (1981). Identifying children at risk in peer relations: A critique of the rate of interaction approach to assessment.Child Development, 52, 1239–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., Singleton, L. C., Tinsley, B. R., & Hymel, S. (1979). Brief reports: A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children.Developmental Psychology, 15, 443–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status.Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, P. (1993).Friendship and peer relations in children. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foyle, H. C., Lyman, L., & Thies, S. A. (1991).Cooperative learning in the early childhood classroom. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galda, L., Bisplinghoff, B. S., Pellegrini, A. D., & Stahl, S. (1995). Sharing lives: Reading, writing, talking, and living in a first-grade classroom.Language Arts, 72, 334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Vasquez, E., & Ehly, S. (1992). Peer tutoring effects on students who are perceived as not socially acceptable.Psychology in the Schools, 29, 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., Gonso, J. & Rasmussen, B. (1975). Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children.Child Development, 46, 709–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M. (1982). Social Interactions as Predictors of Children's Likability and Friendship Patterns: A Multiple Regression Analysis. Paper presented at the Meeting of Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Grondlund, N. E. (1959).Sociometry in the classroom. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research.Review of Educational Research, 53, 5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1991). Cross-age tutoring between student athletes and at-risk children.The Reading Teacher, 45, 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. (1992).Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labbo, L. D., & Teale, W. H. (1990). Cross age reading: A strategy for helping poor readers.The Reading Teacher, 43, 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., & Ogden, S. (1979). The relationship between peer acceptance and children's ideas about helpfulness.Child Development, 50, 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. W. (1995). Who taught you how to do that? Insights into literacy learning in a student-centered, nongraded classroom. In K. Camperell, B. L. Hayes, & R. Telfer (Eds.),Linking literacy: Past, present, and future (pp. 63–75). Fifteenth Annual Yearbook of the American Reading Forum.

  • Nelsen, J., Lott, L., & Glenn, S. (1993).Positive discipline in the classroom: How to effectively use class meetings and other positive discipline strategies. Rocklin, CA: Prima Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. M. (1985).Whole language: Theory in use. Portsmouth, NH: Heihemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, V. G. (1992).You can't say you can't play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putallaz, M., & Gottman, J. M. (1981). An interactional model of children's entry into peer groups.Child Development, 52, 986–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning.Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Stein, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. and trans.);Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

For Further Reading Class Meetings

  • Dinkmeyer, D., McKay, G., & Dinkmeyer, D. (1980).Teachers' handbook: Systematic training for effective teaching. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen, J., Lott, L., & Glenn, S. (1993).Positive discipline in the classroom: How to effectively use class meetings and other positive discipline strategies. Rocklin, CA: Prima Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Cooperative Learning

  • Curran, L. (1990).Cooperative learning lessons for little ones: Literature-based language arts and social skills. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Bartlett, J. K., & Johnson, L. M. (1988).Our cooperative classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. A. (1989). Enhancing early childhood mainstreaming through cooperative learning: A brief literature review.Child Study Journal, 19, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, J., & McCabe, M. (1985).Simple cooperation in the classroom. Willits, CA: ITA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Peer Tutoring

  • DeRita, C., & Weaver, S. (1991). Cross-age literacy program.Reading Improvement, 28(4), 244–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, J. (1991). Tips for Tutoring: Improving Reading Abilities. A Guidebook for the Peer Tutor. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 026.

  • Thomas, R. (1993). Cross-Age and Peer Tutoring. Report No. EDO-CS-93-01; ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 598, Office of Educational Research and Improvement; Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Sociometric Methods

  • Jennings, H. H. (1959).Sociometry in group relations: A manual for teachers. Washington D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., & Gentry, K. W. (1980). Sociometric indices of children's peer interaction in the school setting. In H. Foot, A. Chapman, & J. Smith (Eds.),Friendship and social relations in chldren (pp. 145–177). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northway, M. L. (1967).A primer of sociometry. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, M.W. Addressing issues of peer rejection in child-centered classrooms. Early Childhood Educ J 24, 93–97 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353287

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353287

Key Words

Navigation