Skip to main content
Log in

Responses in spatial organization to manipulations of the food resource in polygynandrous alpine accentors

  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

The alpine accentorPrunella collaris is a territorial and polygynandrous mating species. The breeding unit is a group consisting of about seven members who share a group territory which contains all the resources necessary for living. Each female holds a small territory around her own nest within the larger group territory. Supplemental food in the form of millet seed was provided for a total of 23 group territories to test the hypothesis that the abundance and distribution of food influences the size of a female's territory and her dispersion pattern which, in turn, determine the mating system. Both males and females had regular access to the feeders, but females and groups provided with feeders did not have smaller territories than those without feeders. No groups were divided into two by offering extra food. Provision of extra food resulted in an increase of group size but did not alter the sex ratio. All members, including new settlers, were sexually active and the sexual relationships among the members of a group were still multiple matings. Food addition did not prompt the fed females to choose nest sites nearer the feeder. Nest sites were restricted to particular rocky slopes and non-vegetated areas which were invariably free from snow each year due to the effects of strong winds and the topography. Females showed a nest-site fidelity for successive years. The reason why supplemental food had no effect on the territory size or dispersion of female alpine accentors is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birkhead M. E. (1981) The social behaviour of the dunnockPrunella modularis.Ibis 123: 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin S. (1990) Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future.Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T. H. (1989) Mammalian mating systems.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 236: 339–372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T. H. &Harvey P. H. (1977) Primate ecology and social organization.Journal of Zoology 183: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S. (ed.) (1988)Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. 5, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook J. H. (1964) The evolution of social organization and visual communication in the weaver birds (Ploceinae).Behaviour 10 (Suppl.): 1–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B. (1983) Polyandry, cloaca-pecking and sperm competition in dunnocks.Nature 302: 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B. (1985) Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks,Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system.Animal Behaviour 33: 628–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B. (1991) Mating systems. In:Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn. (eds J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies) pp. 263–294. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B. (1992)Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B. &Lundberg A. (1984) Food distribution and a variable mating system in the dunnock,Prunella modularis.Journal of Animal Ecology 53: 895–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen S. T. &Oring L. W. (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–223.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hews D. K. (1993) Food resources affect female distribution and male mating opportunities in the iguanian lizard (Uta palmeri).Animal Behaviour 46: 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde R. A. (1956) The biological significance of the territories of birds.Ibis 98: 340–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims R. A. (1987) Responses in spatial organization and behaviour to manipulations of the food resource in the voleClethrionomys rufocanus.Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 585–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims R. A. (1988) Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles.Nature 335: 541–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman P. J. (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology.Behaviour 48: 215–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M (1990a) Cloacal protuberance and copulatory behavior of the alpine accentor (Prunella collaris).Auk 107: 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M. (1990b) Age determination in the alpine accentorPrunella collaris by discriminant analysis of morphological measurements.Japanese Journal of Ornithology 39: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M. (1992) Multiple mating and cooperative breeding of the alpine accentorPrunella collaris. D.Sc. thesis, Osaka City University.

  • Nakamura M. (1995) Effects of supplemental feeding and female age on timing of breed in the alpine accentorPrunella collaris.Ibis 137: 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M. Effects of supplemental food and female-age on reproductive success in the alpine accentorPrunella collaris. Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology 27: (in press a).

  • Nakamura M. Territory and group living in the polygynandrous alpine accentorPrunella collaris. Ibis 137: (in press b).

  • Ostfeld R. S. (1986) Terrioriality and mating system of California voles.Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 691–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleszczynska W. K. (1978) Microgeographic prediction of polygyny in the lark bunting.Science 201: 935–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleszczynska W. K. &Hansell R. I. C. (1980) Polygyny and decision theory: testing of a model in lark buntings,Calamospiza melanocorys.American Naturalist 116: 821–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T. W. (1968) Sizes of feeding territories among birds.Ecology 49: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow B. K. &Snow D. W. (1982) Territory and social organization in a population of dunnocksPrunella modularis.Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology 14: 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R. L. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In:Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed B. Campbell) pp. 139–179. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner J. &Willson M. (1966) The influences of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds.Ecology 47: 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger J. F. (1980) Vegetation structure, food supply, and polygyny in bobolinks,Dolichonyx oryzivores.Ecology 61: 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamura, M. Responses in spatial organization to manipulations of the food resource in polygynandrous alpine accentors. Ecol. Res. 10, 281–289 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347854

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347854

Key words

Navigation