Abstract
Spatial filtering of surface electromyography (EMG) signal can be used to enhance single motor unit action potentials (MUAPs). Traditional spatial filters for surface EMG do not take into consideration that some electrodes could have poor skin contact. In contrast to the traditional a priori defined filters, this study introduces an adaptive spatial filtering method that adapts to the signal characteristics. The adaptive filter, the maximum kurtosis filter (MKF), was obtained by using the linear combination of surrounding channels that maximises kurtosis. The MKF and conventional filters were applied to simulated EMG signals and to real EMG signals recorded with an electrode grid to evaluate their performance in detecting single motor units. The MKF was compared with conventional spatial filtering methods. Simulated signals, with different levels of spatially correlated noise, were used for comparison. The influence of one electrode with poor skin contact was also investigated. The MKF was found to be considerably better at enhancing a single MUAP than conventional methods for all levels of spatial correlation of the noise. For a spatial correlation of 0.97 of the noise, the improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio, where a MUAP could be detected, was at least 6 dB. With a simulated poor skin contact for one electrode, the improvement over the other methods was at least 19 dB.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basmajian, J., andDeluca, C. J. (1985): ‘Muscles alive: their function revealed by electromyography, 5th edn’ (Wiliams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1985)
Blok, J. H., van Dijk, J. P., Drost, G., Zwarts, M. J., andStegeman, D. F. (2002): ‘A high density multichannel surface electromyography system for the characterization of single motor units’,Rev. Sci. Instrum.,73, pp. 1887–1897
Cardoso, J.-F., andSouloumiac, A. (1993): ‘Blind beamforming for non Gaussian signals’,IEE Proc. F,140, pp. 362–370
Cardoso, J.-F. (1999): ‘High-order contrasts for independent component analysis’,Neural Comput.,11, pp. 157–192
Chauvet, E., Fokapu, O., Hogrel, J. Y., Gamet, D., and Duchêne, J. (2003): ‘Automatic identification of motor unit action potential trains from electromyographic signals using fuzzy techniques’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,41, pp. 646–653
Disselhorst-Klug, C., Silny, J. andRau, G. (1997): ‘Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,44, pp. 567–574
Disselhorst-Klug, C., Rau, G., Schmeer, A., andSilny, J. (1999): ‘Non-invasive detection of the single motor unit action potential by averaging the spatial potential distribution triggered on a spatially filtered motor unit action potential’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,9, pp. 67–72
Farina, D., andMerletti, R. (2001): ‘A novel approach for precise simulation of the EMG signal detected by surface electrodes’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,48, pp. 637–646
Farina, D., Muhammad, W., Fortunato, E., Meste, O., Meretti, R., andRix, H. (2001): ‘Estimation of single motor unit conduction velocity from surface electromyogram signals detected with linear electrode arrays’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,39, pp. 225–236
Farina, D., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Merletti, R., Indino, B., andGraven-Nielsen, T. (2003a): ‘Selectivity of spatial filters for surface EMG detection from the tibialis anterior muscle’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,50, pp. 354–364
Farina, D., Schulte, E., Merletti, R., Rau, G., andDisselhorst-Klug, C. (2003b): ‘Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part I: spatial selectivity’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,41, pp. 330–337
Farina, D., andMerletti, R. (2004): ‘Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from two-dimensional surface EMG recordings’,J. Neurosci. Methods,134, pp. 199–208
Farina, D., Mesin, L., Martina, S., andMerletti, R. (2004): ‘Comparison of spatial filter selectivity in surface myoelectric signal detection: influence of the volume conductor model’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,42, pp. 114–120
Hermens, J. H., Hägg, G., andFreriks, B. (1997): ‘SENIAM 2: European applications on surface electromyography’. Roessingh Research Development b.v.
Houtman, C. J., Stegeman, D. F., Van Dijk, J. P., andZwarts, M. J. (2003): ‘Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations’,J. Appl. Physiol.,95, pp. 1045–1054
Kamen, G. andCaldwell, G. E. (1996): ‘Physiology and interpretation of the electromyogram’,J. Clin. Neurophysiol.,13, pp. 366–384
Lapatki, B. G., Van Dijk, J. P., Jonas, I. E., Zwarts, M. J. andStegeman, D. F. (2004): ‘A thin, flexible multielectrode grid for high-density surface EMG’,J. Appl. Physiol.,96, pp. 327–336
Merletti, R., Farina, D., andGazzoni, M. (2003): ‘The linear electrode array: a useful tool with many applications’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol,13, pp. 37–47
Nikias, C. L. andMendel, J. M. (1993): ‘Signal processing with higher-order spectra’,IEEE Signal Process. Mag.,10, pp. 10–37
Prutchi, D. (1995): ‘A high-resolution large array (HRLA) surface EMG system’,Med. Eng. Phys.,17, pp. 442–454
Rau, G. andDisselhorst-Klug, C. (1997): ‘Principles of high-spatial-resolution surface EMG (HSR-EMG): Single motor unit detection and application in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,7, pp. 233–239
Rau, G., Disselhorst-Klug, C., andSilny, J. (1997): ‘Noninvasive approach to motor unit characterization: muscle structure, membrane dynamics and neuronal control’,J. Biomech.,30, pp. 441–446
Reucher, H., Rau, G. andSilny, J. (1987a): ‘Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG: Part I-Introduction to measuring technique and applications’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,34, pp. 98–105
Reucher, H., Silny, J., andRau, G. (1987a): ‘Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG: Part II-Filter performance in theory and modeling’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,34, pp. 106–113
Roeleveld, K., Stegeman, D. F., Vingerhoets, H. M., andVan Oosterom, A. (1997): ‘The motor unit potential distribution over the skin surface and its use in estimating the motor unit location’,Acta Physiol. Scand.,161, pp. 465–472
Roeleveld, K. andStegeman, D. F. (2002): ‘What do we learn from motor unit action potentials in surface electromyography?’,Muscle Nerve,11, pp. S92-S97
Rosenfalck, P. (1969): ‘Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models’,Thromb. Diath. Haemorrh. Suppl.,321, pp. 1–168
Schulte, E., Farina, D., Rau, G., Merletti, R., andDisselhorst-Klug, C. (2003): ‘Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part 2: conduction velocity estimation’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,41, pp. 338–345
Zwarts, M. J. andStegeman, D. F. (2003): ‘Multichanel surface EMG: basic aspects and clinical utility’,Muscle Nerve,28, pp. 1–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Östlund, N., Yu, J., Roeleveld, K. et al. Adaptive spatial filtering of multichannel surface electromyogram signals. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42, 825–831 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345217
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345217