Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating auction and search markets: The slow Dutch auction

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of choosing to sell property by auction or by traditional negotiated search markets is addressed in this article. A general selling institution called the slow Dutch auction is introduced. This general selling mechanism reduces to either a conventional auction, a posted offer, or some time dependent mix of these selling institutions depending on the pricing rule chosen by the seller. We model search by having potential buyers whose private valuation for the property is unknown to the seller arrive randomly over time. With this general framework the seller's problem is to choose a selling mechanism that maximizes expected wealth. Surprisingly, we find that the optimal selling institution is always a posted offer market. The seller chooses an optimal posted price and waits until a buyer arrives who is willing to pay this price. Auctions are never optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Case, Carl E. and Shiller, Robert J. “The Efficiency of the Market for Single Family Homes.”American Economic Review 79 (March 1989), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., Smith, Vernon L. and Walker, James M. “Theory and Behavior of First Price Auctions.”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1988), 61–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J.G.Probability and Statistical Inference, Volume 1: Probability. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitmann, G.The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusht, Kenneth M. “Auctions Versus Private Sales of Houses: A Description and Empirical Analysis of the Melbourne, Australia Market.” The Pennsylvania State University, College of Business, Working Paper, May 1990.

  • McAfee, R. Preston and McMillan, John. “Auctions and Bidding,”Journal of Economic Literature 25 (June 1987a), 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston and McMillan, John. “Auctions with a Stochastic Number of Bidders.”Journal of Economic Theory 43 (October 1987b), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston and McMillan, John. “Search Mechanisms.”Journal of Economic Theory 44 (February 1988), 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vernon L. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.”American Economic Review 72 (December 1982), 923–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, William. “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.”Journal of Finance 16 (March 1961), 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, P.D., Kluger, B.D. & Wyatt, S.B. Integrating auction and search markets: The slow Dutch auction. J Real Estate Finan Econ 5, 239–253 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02341912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02341912

Key words

Navigation