Summary
The major membrane protein of the bovine lens fiber cell is a 26-kilodalton (kD) protein (MP26), which appears to be a component of the extensive junctional specializations found in these cells. To examine the arrangement of MP26 within the junctional membranes, various proteases were incubated with fiber cell membranes that had been isolated with or without urea and/or detergents. These membranes were analyzed with electron microscopy and SDS-PAGE to determine whether the junctional specializations or the proteins were altered by proteolysis. Microscopy revealed no obvious structural changes. Electrophoresis showed that chymotrypsin, papain, and trypsin degraded MP26 to 21–22 kD species. A variety of protease treatments, including overnight digestions, failed to generate additional proteolysis. Regions on MP26 which were sensitive to these three proteases overlapped. Smaller peptides were cleaved from MP26 with V8 protease and carboxypptidases A and B. Protein domains cleaved by these proteases also overlapped with regions sensitive to chymotrypsin, papain, and trypsin. Specific inhibition of the carboxypeptidases suggested that cleavage obtained with these preparations was not likely due to contaminating endoproteases. Since antibodies are not thought to readily penetrate the 2–3 nm extracellular gap in the fiber cell junctions, antibodies to MP26 were used to analyze the location of the protease-sensitive domains. Antisera were applied to control (26 kD) and proteolyzed (22 kD) membranes, with binding being evaluated by means of ELISA reactions on intact membranes. Antibody labeling was also done following SDS-PAGE and transfer to derivatized paper. Both assays showed a significant decrease in binding following proteolysis, with the 22 kD product showing no reaction with the anti-MP26 sera. These investigations suggest that MP26 is arranged with approximately fourfifths of the primary sequence “protected” by the lipid bilayer and the narrow extracellular gap. One-fifth of the molecule, including the C-terminus, appears to be exposed on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcala, J., Maisel, H. 1978. Specific antiserum to the main intrinsic polypeptide of chick lens fiber cell plasma membranes.Exp. Eye Res. 26:219–221
Benedetti, E.L., Dunia, I., Bentzel, C.J., Vermorken, A.J.M., Kibbelaar, M., Bloemendal, H. 1976. A portrait of plasma membrane specializations in eye lens epithelium and fibers.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 457:353–384
Benedetti, E.L., Dunia, I., Bloemendal, H. 1974. Development of junctions during differentiation of lens fibers.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 71:5073–5077
Bloemendal, H. 1981. Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Eye Lens. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Bloemendal, H., Hermsen, T., Dunia, I., Benedetti, E.L. 1982. Association of crystallins with the plasma membrane.Exp. Eye Res. 35:61–67
Bloemendal, H., Vermorken, A.J.M., Kibbelaar, M., Dunia, I., Benedetti, E.L. 1977. Nomenclature for the polypeptide chains of lens plasma membranes.Exp. Eye Res. 24:413–415
Bok, D., Dockstader, J., Horwitz, J. 1982. Immunocytochemical localization of the lens main intrinsic polypeptide (MIP26) in communicating junctions.J. Cell Biol. 92:213–220
Broekhuyse, R.M., Kuhlmann, E.D. 1974. Lens membranes. I. Composition of urea-treated plasma membranes from calf lens.Exp. Eye Res. 19:297–302
Broekhuyse, R.M., Kuhlmann, E.D. 1978. Lens membranes. IV. Preparative isolation and characterization of membranes and various membrane proteins from calf lens.Exp. Eye Res. 26:305–320
Broekhuyse, R.M., Kuhlmann, E.D. 1980. Lens membranes. XI. Some properties of human lens main intrinsic protein (MIP) and its enzymatic conversion into a 22,000 dalton polypeptide.Exp. Eye Res. 30:305–310
Broekhuyse, R.M., Kuhlmann, E.D., Winkens, H.J. 1979. Lens membranes. VII. MIP is an immunologically specific component of lens fiber membranes and is identical with 26K band protein.Exp. Eye Res. 29:303–313
Byers, L.D., Wolfenden, R. 1972. A potent reversible inhibitor of carboxypeptidase A.J. Biol. Chem. 247:606–608
Drapeau, G.R. 1976. Protease fromStaphylococcus aureus.In: Methods in Enzymology. L. Lorand, editor. Vol. 45, pp. 469–475. Academic Press, New York
Engvall, E. 1980. Enzyme immunoassay ELISA and EMIT.Methods Enzymol. 70:419–439
Engvall, E., Perlman, P. 1972. Enzym-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA. III. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled anti-immunoglobulin in antigen-coated tubes.J. Immunol. 109:129–135
Fairbanks, G., Steck, T.L., Wallach, D.F.H. 1971. Electrophoretic analysis of the major polypeptides of the human erythrocyte membrane.Biochemistry 10:2606–2617
Finbow, M., Yancey, S.B., Johnson, R., Revel, J.P. 1980. Independent lines of evidence suggesting a major gap junctional protein with a molecular weight of 26,000.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:970–974
Folk, J.E. 1971. Carboxypeptidase B.In: The Enzymes. P. Boyer, editor. Vol. 3, pp. 57–79. Academic Press, New York
Friedlander, M. 1980. Immunological approaches to the study of myogenesis and lens fiber junctions formation.Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 14:321–358
Goodenough, D.A. 1979. Lens gap junctions: A structural hypothesis for nonregulated low-resistance intercellular pathways.Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18:1104–1122
Goodenough, D.A., Dick, J.S.B., II, Lyons, J.E. 1980. Lens metabolic cooperation: A study of mouse lens transport and permeability visualized with freeze substitution autoradiography and electron microscopy.J. Cell Biol. 86:576–589
Henderson, D., Eibl, H., Weber, K. 1979. Structure and biochemistry of mouse hepatic gap junctions.J. Molec. Biol. 132:193–218
Hertzberg, E.L. 1980. Biochemical and immunocytological approaches to the study of gap junctional communication.In Vitro 16:1057–1067
Hertzberg, E.L., Anderson, D., Friedlander, M., Gilula, N. 1982. Comparative analysis of the major polypeptides from liver gap junctions and lens fiber junctions.J. Cell Biol. 92:53–59
Horwitz, J., Wong, M.M. 1980. Peptide mapping by limited proteolysis in sodium dodecyl sulfate of the main intrinsic polypeptides isolated from human and bovine lens plasma membranes.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 622:134–143
Johnson, K.R., Johnson, R.G. 1982. Bovine lens MP26 is phosphorylatedin vitro by an endogenous cAMP-dependent protein kinase.Fed. Proc. 41:755 (abstr.)
Johnson, R.G., Sheridan, J.D. 1971. Junctions between cancer cells in culture: Ultrastructure and permeability.Science 174:717–719
Kistler, J., Bullivant, S. 1980. Lens gap junctions and orthogonal arrays are unrelated.FEBS Lett. 111:73–78
Kuszak, J., Maisel, H., Harding, C.V. 1978. Gap junctions of chick lens fiber cells.Exp. Eye Res. 27:495–498
Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.Nature (London) 227:680–685
Maisel, H., Harding, C.V., Alcala, J.R., Kuszak, J., Bradley, R. 1981. The morphology of the lens.In: The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Eye Lens. H. Bloemendal, editor. pp. 49–71. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Nicholson, B., Gros, D., Revel, J.P. 1982. Tissue specificity in the gap junctional protein.J. Cell Biol. 95:104a (abstr.)
Nicholson, B.J., Hunkapiller, M.W., Hood, L.E., Revel, J.-P. 1980. Partial sequencing of the gap junctional protein from rat lens and liver.J. Cell Biol. 87:200a (abstr.)
Peracchia, C., Peracchia, L.L. 1980. Gap junction dynamics: Reversible effects of hydrogen ions.J. Cell Biol. 87:719–727
Rae, J.L. 1979. The electrophysiology of the crystallin lens.In: Current Topics in Eye Research. J.A. Zadunaisky and H. Davson, editors. pp. 37–90. Academic Press, New York
Ramaekers, F.C.S., Selten-Versteegen, A.M.E., Benedetti, E.L., Dunia, I., Bloemendal, H. 1980.In vitro synthesis of the major lens membrane protein.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:725–729
Renart, J., Reiser, J., Stark, G.R. 1979. Transfer of proteins from gels to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and detection with antisera: A method for studying antibody specificity and antigen structure.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:3116–3120
Sas, D., Johnson, K., Menko, S., Johnson, R. 1982. A monoclonal antibody specific for chicken and bovine lens gap junctional proteins.J. Cell Biol. 95:106a (abstr.)
Sas, D., Keeling, P., Johnson, K., Johnson, R. 1980. Characterizing gap junction proteins from calf lens: Questions of glycosylation and protease sensitivity.J. Cell Biol. 87:96a (abstr.)
Sas, D., Wagoner, M.J., Johnson, R. 1981. Monoclonal antibodies and rabbit antisera to gap junction-rich fractions of bovine lens fiber cell membranes.J. Cell Biol. 91:119a (abstr.)
Simionescu, M., Simionescu, N., Palade, G. 1975. Segmental differentiations of cell junctions in the vascular endothelium.J. Cell Biol. 67:863–885
Strader, C.D., Raftery, M.A. 1980. Topographic studies of Torpedo acetylcholine receptor subunits as a transmembrane complex.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:5807–5811
Takemoto, L.J., Hansen, J.S., Horwitz, J. 1981. Interspecies conservation of the main intrinisc polypeptide (MIP) of the lens membrane.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 68:101–106
Voller, A., Bidwell, D.E., Bartlett, A. 1979. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Independent publication available from Dynatech Lab., Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Waggoner, P.R., Maisel, H. 1978. Immunofluorescent study of a chick lens fiber cell membrane polypetide.Exp. Eye Res. 27:151–157
Wong, M.W., Robertson, N.P., Horwitz, J. 1978. Heat induced aggregation of the sodium dodecyl sulfate-solubilized main intrinsic polypeptide isolated from bovine lens plasma membrane.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 84:158–165
Zampighi, G., Simon, S., Robertson, J., McIntosh, T., Costello, M. 1982. On the structural organization of isolated bovine lens fiber junctions.J. Cell Biol. 93:175–189
Zigler, J.S., Horwitz, J. 1981. Immunochemical studies on the major intrinsic polypeptides from human lens membrane.Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 21:46–51
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keeling, P., Johnson, K., Sas, D. et al. Arrangement of MP26 in lens junctional membranes: Analysis with proteases and antibodies. J. Membrain Biol. 74, 217–228 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02332125
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02332125