Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations and corrections in measuring structural dynamics

An inadequate understanding of the measurement process can result in erroneous force, pressure and acceleration data being accepted as valid for comparison to the results of structural-system dynamic analysis

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work deals with limitations encountered in measuring the dynamic characteristics of structural systems. Structural loading and response are measured by transducers that are characterized by multiple resonant frequencies where peaks occur in the magnification factor of their transfer function. The transfer function of a transducer is the ratio of the Fourier transform of its output to the Fourier transform of the input causing that output. The magnification factor of the transfer function of a transducer is the factor by which its zero-frequency response must be multiplied to determine the magnitude of its steady-state response at any given frequency.

The presence of multiple peaks in the transfer function of a transducer indicates a potential for problems when the transducer responds to a transient stimulus. The problem is more severe if the stimulus contains significant amplitude at frequencies near these peaks; distortion of the recorded signal will occur.

If the transfer function of the transducer is completely characterized, data distortion can be corrected by an inverse treatment. This inverse problem consists of determining the corresponding excitation associated with a particular system model and a given response. Even though measurement difficulties encountered when using transducers with multiple resonant peaks are not generally solvable by an inverse treatment, procedures are described in this work which can be applied on a frequency-selective basis to acquire valid data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schweppe, J.L., Eichberger, L.C., Muster, D.F., Michaels, E.L. andPaskusz, G.F., “Methods for the Dynamic Calibration of Pressure Transducers,”NBS Monograph 67, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, ch. 8, 97–104 (Dec. 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz, G.L. andBaker, W.E., “A Dynamic Data Compensation Technique for Seismic Transducers,”Shock and Vibration Bul.,40 (7),123–132 (Dec. 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. McConnell, K.G., “Active Notch Filters for Extending Frequency Response of Accelerometers,”Experimental Mechanics,12 (5),223–228 (May 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hurty, W.C. andRubinstein, M.F., Dynamics of Structures, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., ch. 8, 278–307 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stein, P.K., Measurement Engineering, Stein Engineering Services, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, ch. 8, 283–289 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chirlian, P.M., Signals, Systems, and the Computer, Intext Educational Publishers, New York, ch. 2, 76–79 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz, M., Information Transmission, Modulation, and Noise, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, ch. 6, 408–410 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walter, P.L., “Limitations and Corrections in Measuring Dynamic Characteristics of Structural Systems,” PhD Thesis, Arizona State University (1978).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the United States Department of Energy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walter, P.L., Nelson, H.D. Limitations and corrections in measuring structural dynamics. Experimental Mechanics 19, 309–316 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324151

Keywords

Navigation