Skip to main content
Log in

New equipment for cyclic biaxial testing

The behavior of the equipment and the modes of failure of the specimens are described and some test data are presented

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods of achieving biaxial-stress states in fatigue tests are reviewed. A new design of equipment that produces five distinct biaxial-stress states by simultaneous direct pressurization and axial loading of thinwalled cylindrical specimens is described. Four variations of stress state are obtained by the use of two sizes of specimen and by reversal of the pressurizing connections. The fifth state is obtained by direct pressurization without axial load. The actual magnitudes of stress in the specimen are computed from the output of the load cell in the reaction frame in which the biaxial-testing device is mounted. Additional stress ratios are obtained using standard uniaxial and torsional cyclic-testing arrangements.

The initial program using this equipment was to investigate the effects of biaxiality on the cyclic properties and low-cycle fatigue behavior of normalized 1018 mild steel, under fully reversed constant-amplitude strain control. Control was achieved using a servo-controlled, electrohydraulic testing system with one of the two clipon strain transducers, that were mounted on the specimen, providing the controlling electrical signal. The system allowed direct recording of the stress-strain hysteresis loops in both principal directions. The behavior of the equipment and the modes of failure of the specimens are described and some test data are presented. The range of application and limitations of the equipment for further cyclic biaxial testing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, J. O., “The Effect of Range of Stress on the Fatigue Strengt of Metals,” Univ. of Illinois, Engineering Experiment Stations, Bulletin No. 334 (Feb. 17, 1942).

  2. Chodorowski, W. T., “Fatigue Strength in Shear of an Alloy Steel,” Proc. Intl. Conf. on Fatigue of Metals. London-New York, 122–131 (1956).

  3. Kennedy, C. R., “Effect of Stress State on Low-Cycle Fatigue,” ASTM STP-338, Symp. on Fatigue of Aircraft Struct., 92–104 (1962).

  4. Halford, G. R. andMorrow, JoDean, “Low-Cycle Fatigue in Torsion,”Proc. ASTM,62,695–709 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gough, H. J., “Engineering Steels under Combined Static and Cyclic Stresses,”Jnl. Appl. Mech.,17 (2),113–125 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Findley, W. N., “Fatigue of 76S-T61 Aluminum Alloy under Combined Bending and Torsion,”Proc. ASTM,52,818–832 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Findley, W. N., “Fatigue of Metals under Combinations of Stresses,”Trans. ASME,79,1337–1348 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ros, M. and Eichinger, A., “Die Bruchgefahr fester Korper bie Wiederholten Beanspruchung-Ermundung,” EMPA Bulletin,173,Zurich (1950).

  9. Bundy, R. W. andMarin, J., “Fatigue Strength of 14S-T4 Aluminum Alloy Subjected to Biaxial Stresses,”Proc. ASTM,54,755–766 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marin, J., “Biaxial Tension-tension Fatigue Strengths of Metals,”Jnl. Appl. Mech.,16,383–388 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Majors, H., Jr., Mills, B. D., Jr. andMacGregor, C. W., “Fatigue under Combined Pulsating Stresses,”Jnl. Appl. Mech.,16,269–276 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sawert, W., “Verhalten der Baustachle bei Wechselnder Mehrachsiger Beanspruchung,”Z. Deut. Ing.,87, (39/40),609–615 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bowman, C. E. andDolan, T. J., “Studies of the Biaxial Fatigue Properties of Pressure Vessel Steels,”Welding Jnl. Res. Suppl.34 (1),51s-59s (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowman, C. E. andDolan, T. J., “Biaxial Fatigue Properties of Pressure Vessel Steels,”Welding Jnl. Res. Suppl.,32 (11),529s-537s (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ives, K. D., Kooistra, L. F. and Tucker, J. T., Jr, “Equibiaxial Low-Cycle Fatigue Properties of Typical Pressure Vessel Steels,” ASME Paper 65-MET-19.

  16. Shewchuk, J., Zamrik, S. Y., andMarin, J., “Low-cycle Fatigue of 7075-T651 Aluminum Alloy in Biaxial Bending,”Experimental Mechanics,8 (11),504–512 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gross, J. H., Tsang, S. andStout, R. D., “Factors Affecting Resistance of Pressure Vessel Steels to Repeated Loading,”Welding Jnl. Res. Suppl.,32 (1),23s-30s (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gross, J. H., Gucer, D. E. andStout, R. D., “The Plastic Fatigue Strength of Pressure Vessel Steels,”Welding Jnl. Res. Suppl. 33, (1),31s-39s (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stout, R. D. and Pense, A. W., “Effect of Composition and Microstructure on the Low-Cycle Fatigue Strength of Structural Steels,” Jnl. Basic Eng., 269–274 (June 1965).

  20. Pascoe, K. J. andde Villiers, J. W. R., “Low-Cycle Fatigue of Steels under Biaxial Straining,”Jnl. Strain Anal.,2 (2),117–126 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  21. McLaren, S. W. and Terry, E. L., “Characteristics of Aerospace Materials Subjected to Biaxial Static and Fatigue Loading Conditions,” ASME Paper 63-WA-315.

  22. McLaren, S. W. and Best, J. H., “Plastic Strain Accumulation—New Fatigue Life Forecaster?,“ SAE Jnl., 68–75 (Sept. 1965).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research for this paper was supported in part by the Defence Research Board of Canada, Grant Number 9535-49 and the National Research Council of Canada, Grant Number A 1694.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Havard, D.G., Topper, T.H. New equipment for cyclic biaxial testing. Experimental Mechanics 9, 550–557 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02316657

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02316657

Keywords

Navigation