Skip to main content
Log in

Large numbers hypothesis: Reply to a paper by Beesham

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss a recent paper by Beesham, showing that his criticism of an article by Berman is based on a contradiction, though his arguments are interesting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beesham, A. (1994).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,33, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. S. (1992a).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,31, 1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. S. (1992b).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,31, 1447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. S. (1994).Astrophysics and Space Science,215, 135.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1937).Nature,139, 323.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1938).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,165, 199.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1979).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A,365, 19.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. N. (1990). University of Florida, private communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berman, M.S. Large numbers hypothesis: Reply to a paper by Beesham. Int J Theor Phys 35, 1033–1035 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302388

Keywords

Navigation