Abstract
We discuss a recent paper by Beesham, showing that his criticism of an article by Berman is based on a contradiction, though his arguments are interesting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beesham, A. (1994).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,33, 1935.
Berman, M. S. (1992a).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,31, 1217.
Berman, M. S. (1992b).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,31, 1447.
Berman, M. S. (1994).Astrophysics and Space Science,215, 135.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1937).Nature,139, 323.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1938).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,165, 199.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1979).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A,365, 19.
Fry, J. N. (1990). University of Florida, private communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berman, M.S. Large numbers hypothesis: Reply to a paper by Beesham. Int J Theor Phys 35, 1033–1035 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302388
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302388