Skip to main content
Log in

Market revaluations of foreign listings' reconciliations to U.S. financial reporting

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Securities and Exchange Commission requires foreign firms wishing to list their securities on the U.S. exchanges to convert their financial statements to U.S.-based generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in a reconciliation filing known as Form 20-F. This paper extends prior research analyzing the importance of the SEC requirement by examining the value relevance to U.S. capital markets of Form 20-F reconciliation information under two additional hypotheses: investors' anticipation of the reconciliation, and investors' perception of foreign countries' enforcement and reliability in applying local accounting rules. It is argued that the information content of the Form 20-F reconciliation data is preempted (at least partially) on the date of foreign earnings announcements because of investor anticipation of these reconciliations. Therefore, only significant unanticipated reconciliations exhibit value relevance on the date of filing. In addition, investor perception of the reliability of the reconciliations and the degree of confidence in foreign authorities enforcing local GAAP also affect the value relevance of the reconciliation data. This study hypothesizes that reconciliations made by firms from countries with mature and developed capital markets should be more value relevant to U.S. investors. The results show that both unexpected foreign earnings and anticipated reconciliations to U.S. GAAP are significantly associated with unexpected market returns during the week of earnings announcements. The region of the foreign country is also significantly associated with market returns. However, unexpected reconciliations are not significantly associated with unexpected market returns during the week of Form 20-F filing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amir, E.; Harris, T.; Venuti, E. “A Comparison of the Value-Relevance of U.S. vs. Non-U.S. GAAP Accounting Measures Using Form 20-F Reconciliations,”Journal of Accounting Research, 31, Supplement, 1993, pp. 230–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, S. P.; Hanna., J. D.; Richardson, G. “Capital Market Effects of U.S.-Canada GAAP Differences,”Journal of Accounting Research, 32, Autumn, 1994, pp. 262–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M.; Clinch, G. “International Accounting Differences and Their Relation to Share Prices: Evidence of U.K., Australian, and Canadian Firms,”Contemporary Accounting Research, 43, Spring, 1996, pp. 135–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C.; Seow, G. S. “The Association Between Stock Returns and Foreign GAAP Earnings Versus Earnings Adjusted to U.S. GAAP,”Journal of Accounting & Economics, 21, 1996, pp. 139–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. L. “Are U.S. Regulatory Requirements for Foreign Firms Appropriate?,”Fordham International Law Journal, 17, 1994, pp. S58-S67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, W. C. “That Trade Obstacle, the SEC,”Wall Street Journal, August 27, 1993, p. A12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, C. A.; Kinney, W. R. “Disclosure Choices of Foreign Registrants in the United States,”Journal of Accounting Research, 34, Spring, 1996, pp. 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, C. L.; Meek, G. “Analysts' Earnings Forecasts and the Value Relevance of 20-F Reconciliation from Non-U.S. to U.S. GAAP,”Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 9, 1998, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M.; Muller, K. “The Market Valuation of IAS vs. U.S. GAAP Accounting Measures Using Form 20-F Reconciliations,”Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, 1999, pp. 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, P. “the Information Content of Foreign and U.S. GAAP Earnings in SEC Form 20-F,” Working paper, New York University, 1993.

  • Miller, P. D. “The Market Reaction to International Cross-Listings: Evidence From Depository Receipts,”Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 1999, pp. 103–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, P. “Discussion of ‘A Comparison of the Value-Relevance of U.S. Versus Non-U.S. GAAP Accounting Measures using Form 20-F Reconciliations,”Journal of Accounting Research, 31, Supplement, 1993, pp. 265–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, P.; Rees, W. P. “International Differences in GAAP and the Pricing of Earnings,”Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, Autumn, 1992, pp. 190–205.

  • PRIMARK. Primark Financial Information Division, Disclosure Incorporated: Maryland, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, L.; Elgers, P. “The Market's Valuation of Non-Reported Accounting Measures: Retrospective Reconciliations of Non-U.S. and U.S. GAAP,”Journal of Accounting Research, 35, Spring, 1997, pp. 115–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlen, J. M.; Boatsman, J. R.; Hertz, R. H.; Jans, G. J.; Palepu, K. G. “American Accounting Association's Financial Accounting Standards Committee: Response to the SEC Concepts Release on International Accounting Standards,”Accounting Horizon, 14, 4, 2000, pp. 489–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Gazzar, S.M., Finn, P.M. & Jacob, R.A. Market revaluations of foreign listings' reconciliations to U.S. financial reporting. International Advances in Economic Research 8, 221–234 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297960

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297960

Keywords

Navigation