Skip to main content
Log in

Bargaining and the observability of contractual commitments via third parties

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes a two-stage model of bilateral bargaining where one of the agents has the option to delegate. A first approach is to assume that the contract between the agent and his representative is perfectly observable and can be renegotiated. Commitment effects arise although renegotiation is possible. Then, perfect observability of the contract is weakened to observe it with certain probability. Commitment effects as pure-strategy equilibria exist if this probability is sufficiently close to 1, in contrast to Bagwell's [1995] findings that imperfect observability undermines commitment. Considering the realistic case of the actual agreement between two parties being private information, the commitment value as equilibrium outcome disappears since having closed a renegotiation-proof contract offers costless self-insurance against strategic misunderstandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagwell, K. "Commitment and Observability in Games,"Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 1995, pp. 221–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud, B.; Julien, B.; Picard, P. "Competing Vertical Structures: Precommitment and Renegotiation,"Econometrica, 63, 1995, pp. 621–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripont, M. "Commitment Through Renegotiation-Proof Contracts with Third Parties,"Review of Economic Studies, 55, 1988, pp. 377–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C.; Judd, K.; Kalai, E. "Observable Contracts: Strategic Delegation and Cooperation,"International Economic Review, 32, 1991, pp. 551–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C.; Kalai, E. "Unobserved Delegation,"International Economic Review, 38, 1997, pp. 763–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.; Selten, R.A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. L. "Game-Playing Agents: Unobservable Contracts as Precommitments,"The Rand Journal of Economics, 22, 1991, pp. 307–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, A. "The Value of Ignorance,"The Rand Journal of Economics, 29, 1998, pp. 339–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J. F. "Two Examples of Strategic Equilibrium,"Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 1995, pp. 378–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. "Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model,"Econometrica, 50, 1982, pp. 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. "An Essay on Bargaining,"American Economic Review, 46, 1956, pp. 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • __.The Strategy of Conflict, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. "Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games,"International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 1975, pp. 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl, I.Bargaining Theory, Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm School of Economics, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is grateful for helpful comments from Vasco Santos, participants at the International Atlantic Economic Conference, October 7–10, 1999, Montreal, Canada, an anonymous referee, and David M. Aadland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lang, G. Bargaining and the observability of contractual commitments via third parties. International Advances in Economic Research 7, 213–230 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296010

Keywords

Navigation