Skip to main content
Log in

On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important assumption in IRT model-based adaptive testing is that matching difficulty levels of test items with an examinee's ability makes a test more efficient. According to Lord, “An examinee is measured most effectively when the test items are neither too difficult nor too easy for him”. This assumption is examined and challenged through a class of one-parameter IRT models including those of Rasch and the normal ogive. It is found that for a specific model, the validity of the fundamental assumption is closely related to the so-called van Zwet tail ordering of symmetric distributions. In this connection, the cosine distribution serves as the borderline between those satisfying the assumption and those violating the assumption. Graphic and numerical illustrations are presented to demonstrate the theoretic results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkermans, W., & Muraki, E. (1997). Item information and discrimination functions for trinary PCM items.Psychometrika, 62, 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick,Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395–479). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger, T.P. (1984).Statistical inference based on ranks. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1994). On equivalence between a partial credit item and a set of independent Rasch binary items,Psychometrika, 59, 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1996). Decomposition of a Rasch partial credit item into independent binary and indecomposable trinary items.Psychometrika, 61, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., & Johnson, N.L. (1986).Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, Vol. 7. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., & Johnson, N.L. (1988).Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, Vol. 9. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, M. F. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In W.H. Holtzman (Ed.),Computer-assisted instruction, testing and guidance. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, M. F. (1971). Robbins-Monro procedures for tailored testing.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, M. F. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute of Educational Research. (Expanded edition, 1980, The University of Chicago Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1979).Constant information model: A new, promising item characteristic function (ONR 79-1). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (2000). Logistic positive exponent family of models: Virtue of asymmetric item characteristic curves.Psychometrika, 65, 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1925). A method of scaling psychological and educational tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 433–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zwet, W.R. (1964).Convex Transformations of random variables (Mathematical Centre Tracts, Vol. 7). Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1996).Some fundamental issues in item response theory with applications, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois. Champaign-Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Stout, W.F. (1999). The theoretical detect index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure.Psychometrika, 64, 213–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiliang Ying.

Additional information

Research by Peter Bickel supported by NSF Grant DMS 95-04955. Research by Steven Buyske supported by ETS Psychometric Fellowship. Research by Huahua Chang supported by ETS research allocation PJ 79427. Research by Zhiliang Ying supported by ETS Visiting Scholar Program, NSF Grant DMS 96-26750, and NSA Grant MDA 96-1-0034.

We would like to thank the Associate Editor and two referees for their helpful and constructive comments, which led to many improvements. We also thank Ming-Mei Wang and Eiji Muraki for relating our work to Samejima (1979), Fumiko Samejima for sending us her manuscript, and Charles Davis for helpful conversations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bickel, P., Buyske, S., Chang, H. et al. On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability. Psychometrika 66, 69–77 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295733

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295733

Key words

Navigation