Summary
Cyclodextrin-modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography has enabled the chiral separation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Twelve PCBs (45, 84, 88, 91, 95, 132, 136, 139, 149, 171, 183 and 196) were individually separated into their two enantiomers by using γ-cyclodextrin as modifier in a separation buffer containing 2-(N-cyclohexylamino)ethanesulphonic acid (CHES) and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) micelles. Multicomponent separations were also performed. The separation of the eighteen enantiomers of a mixture of nine chiral PCBs has been performed in a short analysis time (ca. 35 min).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. A. König, B. Gehrcke, T. Runge, C. Wolf, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.16, 376 (1993).
A. Glausch, G. J. Nicholson, M. Fluck, V. Schurig, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.17, 347 (1994).
P. de Voogt, P. Haplund, L. B. Reutergardh, C. de Wit, F. Waern, Anal. Chem.66, 305A (1994).
S. Fachetti, Mass Spectrometry Rev.12, 173 (1993).
K. L. E. Kaiser, Environ. Pollut.7, 93 (1974).
Dioxin '94. Short Papers. Organohalogen Compounds, Vol.20, Eds. H. Fiedler et al., 15 (1994).
V. Schurig, A. Glausch, Naturwissenschaften80, 468 (1993).
J. H. Hardt, C. Wolf, B. Gehrcke, D. H. Hochmuth, B. Pfaffenberger, H. Hühnerfuss, W. A. König, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.17, 859 (1994).
S. Terabe, Y. Miyashita, Y. Ishihama, O. Shibata, J. Chromatogr.636, 47 (1993).
S. Terabe, Y. Miyashita, O. Shibata, E. R. Barnhart, L. R. Alexander, D. G. Patterson, B. L. Karger, K. Hosoya, N. Tanaka, J. Chromatogr.516, 23 (1990).
K. Ballschmiter, M. Zell, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem.302, 20 (1980).
M. A. García, M. L. Marina, J. C. Díez-Masa, J. Chromatogr. A, in press.
H. J. Isaaq, Instrumentation Sci. & Technol.22, 119 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marina, M.L., Benito, I., Díez-Masa, J.C. et al. Chiral separation of polychlorinated biphenyls by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with γ-cyclodextrin as modifier in the separation buffer. Chromatographia 42, 269–272 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02290308
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02290308