Abstract
It is shown that to combine readings from “points of view” configurations as assumed in Tucker and Messick's model is not to combine configurations in any simple way. Both empirical and logical consequences of the disparity are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eckart, C. and Young G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 211–218.
Ross, J. Mean performance and the factor analysis of learning data.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 67–73.
Tucker, L. R. Determination of parameters of a functional relationship by factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 19–23.
Tucker, L. R and Messick, S. An individual difference model for multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 333–367.
Weitzman, R. A. A factor analytic method for investigating differences between groups of individual learning curves.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 69–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, J. A remark on tucker and Messick's “points of view” analysis. Psychometrika 31, 27–31 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289454
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289454