Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of end-capping on the enantioselectivity of a chiral phase

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of end-capping chiral stationary phases (CSP's) derived fromN-(2-naphthyl)alanine undecyl ester has been examined using either trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS), hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), or bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) as end-capping reagents. The separation factor (α) and capacity factor (k′) of the enantiomers ofN-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl)leucine octadecyl amide andN-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl)alanine butyl ester were evaluated on three columns all packed with material from the same batch of stationary phase. These columns were essentially identical before, but not after end-capping with the above reagents. TMCS and HMDS were found to be superior to BSTFA, which appears to cause a significant loss of bonded phase from the silica surface. It seems that residual silanols affect the retention either by interacting with the analyte or by interacting with strands of stationary phase. End-capping usually increases enantioselectivity, sometimes by decreasing k′ for the first enantiomer and increasing k′ for the second enantiomer. The enhancement in enantioselectivity is greatest in relatively nonpolar mobile phases and occurs to a greater extent for phases having incomplete surface coverages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. D. McMurtrey, J. Liq. Chromatogr.11, 3375 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Buszewski, Chromatographia28, 574 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. C. Sander, S. A. Wise, CRC, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.18, 299 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Verzele, M. De Coninck, C. Dewaele, E. Geeraert, Chromatographia19, 443 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. H. Lochmüller, D. B. Marshall, Anal. Chim Acta42, 63 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. H. Lochmüller, M. T. Kersey, M. L. Hunnicutt, Anal. Chim Acta175, 267 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Yamaguchi, T. Hanai, H. J. Cai, Chromatogr.441, 183 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. B. Evans, A. D. Dale, C. J. Little, Chromatographia13, 5 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. H. Pirkle, J. E. McCune, J. Chromatogr.479, 419 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. H. Pirkle, T. C. Pochapsky, G. S. Malher, D. E. Corey, D. S. Reno, D. M. Allessi, J. Org. Chem.51, 4991 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. H. Pirkle, M. H. Hyun, J. Org. Chem.49, 3034 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. J. Hann, R. K. Gilpin, Anal. Chem.61, 1534 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pirkle, W.H., Readnour, R.S. The influence of end-capping on the enantioselectivity of a chiral phase. Chromatographia 31, 129–132 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274559

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274559

Key Words

Navigation