Skip to main content
Log in

Selection, patches and genetic variation: A cellular automaton modellingDrosophila populations

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Many models have been proposed in which environmental heterogeneity promotes genetic diversity. Such models describe the situation where different phenotypes have different fitness values in different types of patch and are the genetic equivalent of the traditional resource partitioning models in ecology which allow the coexistence of species. Here we construct a different type of cellular model in which polymorphisms in populations ofDrosophila can be maintained without traditional resource partitioning. Parameter values taken from laboratory and field observations represent fungal breedingDrosophila. Some stochasticity is used in the description of the migration between patches. In the model space is divided into a uniform matrix of cells each of which has the potential to contain an ephemeral resource item (fungal fruiting body). Square arenas of up to 400 cells were used. Genotypes arrive at a fresh site, breed (Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium) and lay eggs. The eggs hatch and the larvae compete using the Hassell-Comins competition equations, as if they were three different species. Adult emergents all migrate to an adjacent cell. The aggregation patterns observed in nature are produced using an ‘attraction probability’ where each fly has a chance of moving to the currently most densely populated adjacent patch. This ‘black box’ description of migration produces distribution patterns which are indistinguishable from those seen in wild populations of fungal breedingDrosophila. Results show that the ‘attraction probability’ is the key factor in the maintenance of polymorphism and that even when the competitive advantage of the superior genotype is very great, polymorphisms can be maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P. (1983) The theory of limiting similarity.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 359–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, W. D. and Shorrocks, B. (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model.J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 461–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellows, T. S. (1981) The descriptive properties of some models for density dependence.J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 139–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. G. (1972) Multiple niche polymorphism.Am. Nat. 106, 254–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, F. B. (1974) Sufficient conditions for protected polymorphism in a subdivided population.Am. Nat. 108, 157–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, F. B. (1975) Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population.Am. Nat. 109, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. (1973a) The effect of mutation on population size.Nature 242, 196–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. (1973b) Mutation and population size.Heredity 31, 367–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1990) Competition and genetic variation in a patchy environment: a laboratory model. PhD Thesis, Leeds University.

  • Gilpin, M. E. and Ayala, F. J. (1973) Global models of growth and competition.Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. 70, 3590–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1981) Coexistence of competitors in patchy environments with and without predation.Oikos 37, 306–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P. (1975) Density dependence in single species populations.J. Anim. Ecol. 42, 693–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P. and Comins, H. N. (1976) Discrete time models for two-species competition.Theoret. Pop. Biol. 9, 202–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P., Comins, H. N. and May, R. M. (1991) Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics.Nature 353, 255–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, A. R. (1991) Aggregation and coexistence in a carrion fly community.Ecol. Monogr. 61, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitman, M., Shorrocks, B. and Dytham, C. (1992) Genes and Ecology: two alternative perspectives usingDrosophila. InGenes in Ecology. (R. J. Berry, ed) BES Symposium 33, Blackwell, Oxford (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H. (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available.Am. Nat. 87, 131–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. and MacArthur, R. H. (1966) The maintenance of genetic polymorphism in a spatially heterogeneous environment: variation on a theme by Howard Levene.Am. Nat. 100, 585–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. C. (1955) The stability of an equilibrium and the average fitness of a population.Am. Nat. 89, 281–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and Levins, R. (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species.Am. Nat. 101, 377–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1973)Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1966) Sympatric speciation.Am. Nat. 100, 637–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1970) Genetic polymorphism in a varied environment.Am. Nat. 104, 487–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, E. (1978) Genetic variation in natural populations: patterns and theory.Theoret. Pop. Biol. 13, 121–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. J. (1954) An outline of the population dynamics of natural populations.Austral. J. Zool. 2, 9–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosewell, J., Shorrocks, B. and Edwards, K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: testing the assumptions. I. Aggregation.J. Anim. Ecol. 59, 977–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1985)SAS/GRAPH User's Guide, Version 5 Edition SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. (1982) The breeding sites of temperate woodlandDrosophila.The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3b. (M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson Jr, eds) pp. 385–428, Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. (1990) Competition and selection in a patchy and ephemeral habitat: the implications for insect life-cycles.Insect Life Cycles. (F. Gilbert, ed.) pp. 215–28, Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. (1991) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a cage experiment.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 43, 211–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. and Charlesworth, P. (1980) The distribution and abundance of the British fungal-breedingDrosophila.Ecol. Entomol. 5, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. and Rosewell, J. (1986) Guild size in drosophilids: a simulation model.J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 527–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. and Rosewell, J. (1987) Spatial patchiness and community structure: coexistence and guild size of drosophilids on ephemeral resources.Organisation of Communities: Past and Present (J. H. R. Gee and P. S. Giller, eds) pp. 29–51, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B., Rosewell, J., Edwards, K. and Atkinson, W. D. (1984) Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities.Nature 310, 310–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B., Rosewell, J. and Edwards, K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: testing the assumptions. II. Association.J. Anim. Ecol. 59, 1003–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobeck, C. (1974) Selection in a fine-grained environment.Am. Nat. 109, 419–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1977) Density dependence in the life-cycles of animals and its importance in k- and r-strategies.J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 677–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean.Nature 189, 732–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1968a) Polymorphism, population size, and genetic load.Population Biology and Evolution. (R. C. Lewontin, ed.) pp. 87–108, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1968b)Topics in Population Genetics. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1975) Hard and soft selection revisited.Evolution 29, 465–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1981)Basic Population Genetics. Columbis University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama, S. and Schaal, B. A. (1985) A note on multiple-niche polymorphism in plant populations.Am. Nat. 125, 158–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dytham, C., Shorrocks, B. Selection, patches and genetic variation: A cellular automaton modellingDrosophila populations. Evol Ecol 6, 342–351 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270970

Keywords

Navigation