Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 115–129 | Cite as

Physical constrints on the evolution of ctenophore size and shape

  • Catherine L. Craig
  • Akira Okubo
Papers

Summary

Cilia bundled into combs or ctenes are an evolutionary innovation that allow comb jellies (animals in the phylum Ctenophora) to swim faster and grow to sizes at least two orders of magnitude larger than animals that propel themselves by beating single cilia. Ctenophore size, shape and swimming behaviors, however, may be constrained by the mechanisms that coordinate comb plate oscillations.

Oscillations of comb plates onPleurobrachia bachei (a cydippid comb jelly), are coupled by fluid interactions between combs. Ctenes beat metachronously (in sequence) and the flows generated byP. bachei are retarded by the amount of time it takes a wave to pass down a group of ctenes. Our model predicts thatP. bachei size is constrained by the maximum thrust that can be produced by ctenes that beat in sequence and our flow visualization studies suggest that swimming via metachronous comb oscillations may constrainP. bachei to spherical shapes.

In contrast, comb plate oscillations onMnemiopsis leidyi, a lobate comb jelly, are neurally coordinated and groups of ctenes beat in synchrony. As a result, fluid flows generated byM. leidyi are not retarded by the passage of metachronal waves down each comb row.M. leidyi reach sizes 15 times larger, but swim relatively slower (body lengths per second) thanP. bachei.

We propose that propulsion via metachronous or synchronous comb plate oscillations has played an important role in the evolution of ctenophore shape and size and may have divided comb jellies into two evolutionary lineages.

Keywords

ctenophora fluid dynamics evlution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blake, J. R. and Sleigh, M. A. (1974) Mechanics of ciliary locomotion.Biological Review 49, 85–125.Google Scholar
  2. Franc, J. M. (1978) Organization and function of ctenophore colloblasts: an ultrastructural study.Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole155, 527–41.Google Scholar
  3. Greene, C. E., Landry, M. R. and Monger, B. C. (1986) Foraging behavior and prey selection by the ambush entangling predator,Pleurobrachia bachei.Ecology 67, 1493–501.Google Scholar
  4. Harbison, G. R. (1985) On the classification and evolution of the Ctenophora. InThe origins and relationships of lower invertebrates (S. C. Morris, J. D. George, R. Gibson and H. M. Platt, eds) pp. 78–100. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Harbison, G. R. and Madin, L. P. (1982) Ctenophore. InSynopsis and classification of living organisms (S. P. Parker, ed.) pp. 707–15. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Katz, D. F. and Blake, J. R. (1974) Flagellar motions near walls. InSwimming and flying in nature. I. (T. Y.-T. Wu, C. J. Brokaw and C. Bennen, eds) pp. 173–204. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Knight-Jones, E. W. (1954) Relations between metachronism and the direction of ciliary beat in Metazoa.Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 95, 503–21.Google Scholar
  8. Nachtigall, W. (1980) Mechanics of swimming in water-beatles. InAspects of Animal Movement (H. Y. Elder and E. R. Trueman, eds) pp. 107–24. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Prandt, L. and Tietjens, O. G. (1934)Applied hydro- and aeromechanics Dover Publ. New York.Google Scholar
  10. Reeve, M. R. and Walter, M. A. (1978) Nutritional ecology of ctenophores—A review of recent research. InAdvances in marine biology (F. S. Russel and M. Younge, eds) pp. 249–87. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Rouse, H. (1946)Elementary mechanics of fluids. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Sleigh, M. A. and Aiello, E. (1972) The movement of water by cilia.Acta Protozoologica 11, 266–77.Google Scholar
  13. Sleigh, M. A. and Barlow, D. I. (1980) Matachronism and control of locomotion in animals with many propulsive structures. InAspects of Animal Movement (A. Y. Elder and E. R. Truemon, eds) pp. 49–70. Soc. Exp. Biol. Sem. Ser. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Sleigh, M. A. and Blake, J. R. (1977) Methods of ciliary propulsion and their size limitations. InScale Effects of Animal Locomotion (T. J. Pedley, ed.) Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sleigh, M. A. and Jarman, M. (1973) Grade responses in ciliary activity of ctenophores compared with the ‘staircase’ of cardiac muscle.J. Mechanochem. Cell Motility. 2, 61–8.Google Scholar
  16. Tamm, S. L. (1973) Mechanisms of ciliary coordination in ctenophores.J. Exp. Biol. 59, 231–45.Google Scholar
  17. Tamm, S. L. (1982) Ctenophora. InElectrical Conduction and Behaviour in ‘Simple’ Invertebrates (G. B. Shelton, ed.) pp. 266–358. clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Tamm, S. L. and Moss, A. G. (1985) Umilateral ciliary reversal and motor responses during prey capture by the ctenophorePleurobrachia.J. Exp. Biol. 114, 443–61.Google Scholar
  19. Vogel, S. (1983)Life in Moving Fluids. New Jersey, Princeton.Google Scholar
  20. Weihs, S. (1980) Encergetic significance of changes in swimming modes during larval anchovy,Engraulis mordax. Fisher Bulletin77, 597–604.Google Scholar
  21. Wu, T. Y. (1977) Introduction to the scaling of aquatic animal locomotion. InScale Effects in Animal Locomotion (T. J. Pedley, ed.) pp. 203–32. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine L. Craig
    • 1
  • Akira Okubo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Obsborn Memorial LaboratoriesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Marine Sciences Research CenterState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations