Summary
I compare the relationship between bill size (depth) and body size among different taxa of seed-eating finches to test the hypothesis (Schluter, 1988a) that in habitats where seed-eating finches are vulnerable to predators, finches have larger bodies relative to their bill size. In support of this hypothesis, ground-foraging finches on continents (Emberizidae, Passeridae, Fringillidae), where predators are more common, have larger bodies relative to their bill sizes than do ground-foraging finches on islands (Emberizidae, Fringillidae). Ground-feeding finches on continents may also be more vulnerable to predators than tree- and shrub-foraging finches. As predicted, in North America, ground-feeding finches (Emberizinae) have larger bodies relative to their bill size than do tree- and shrub-foraging finches (Carduelinae). As a consequence of increased body size relative to bill size, both the range of possible bill sizes and potential seed sizes that can be eaten are reduced. Moreover, increased metabolic demands caused by larger body size may lessen the ability to specialize on a few seed types. These two factors reduce the potential for seed size partitioning. Consequently, vulnerability to predators may limit, and is inversely correlated with, seed size partitioning in seed-eating finch communities. The extent to which predation has influenced other bird communities may be considerable, and the patterns found by Schluter (1988a) and in this study indicate that future ecomorphological studies, especially on species that spend much of the day foraging, might profit by considering predator vulnerability as well as foraging behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, I., Abbott, L. K. and Grant, P. R. (1977) Comparative ecology of Galápagos ground finches (Geospiza Gould): Evaluation of the importance of floristic diversity and interspecific competition.Ecol. Monogr. 47, 151–84.
Allaire, P. N. and Fisher, C. D. (1975) Feeding ecology of three resident sympatric sparrows in eastern Texas.Auk 92, 260–69.
Austin, O. L. (1968) Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows and allies. Part I.U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 237.
Bannerman, D. A. (1963)Birds of the Atlantic Islands. Vol. 1. A History of the Canary Islands and of the Salvages. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
Bannerman, D. A. and Bannerman, W. M. (1966)Birds of the Atlantic Islands. Vol. 3. A history of the birds of the Azores. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
Benkman, C. W. (1988a) Seed handling ability, bill structure, and the cost of specialization for crossbills.Auk 105, 715–19.
Benkman, C. W. (1988b) Flock size, food dispersion, and the feeding behavior of crossbills.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 167–75.
Benkman, C. W. and Pulliam, H. R. (1988) The comparative feeding rates of North American sparrows and finches.Ecology 69, 1195–9.
Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P., Smith, R. J. and Wirtz, W. O. II (1988) The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents.Oecologia 76, 408–15.
Calder, W. A. III (1974) Consequences of body size for avian energetics. InAvian Energetics (R. A. Paynter, Jr., ed.) pp. 86–151. Nuttall Ornithol. Club, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Caraco, T., Martindale, S. and Pulliam, H. R. (1980) Avian flocking in the presence of a predator.Nature 285, 400–1.
Conant, S. (1988) Geographic variation in the Laysan Finch (Telespyza cantans).Evol. Ecol. 2, 270–82.
Connell, J. H. (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. InEcology and Evolution of Communities (M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond, eds) pp. 460–90. Belknap Press, Harvard, USA.
Davis, J. (1973) Habitat preferences and competition of wintering juncos and golden-crowned sparrows.Ecology 54, 174–80.
Diamond, J. M. and Jones, H. L. (1980) Breeding land birds of the Channel Islands. InThe California Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium (D. M. Power, ed.) pp. 597–612. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Dickman, C. R. (1988) Body size, prey size, and community structure in insectivorous mammals.Ecology 69, 569–80.
Dunning, J. B., Jr. (1984) Body weights of 686 species of North American birds.Western Bird Banding Assoc. Monogr. No. 1.
Dunning, J. B., Jr. and Brown, J. H. (1982) Summer rainfall and winter sparrow densities: a test of the food limitation hypothesis.Auk 99, 123–9.
Ekman, J. (1986) Tree use and predator vulnerability of wintering passerines.Ornis Scand. 17, 261–7.
Ekman, J. (1987) Exposure and time use in willow tit flocks: the cost of subordination.Anim. Behav. 35, 445–52.
Ekman, J. and Askenmo, C. E. H. (1984) Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups.Anim. Behav. 32, 508–14.
Fretwell, S. D. (1969) Ecotypic variation in the nonbreeding season in migratory populations: a study of tarsal length in some Fringillidae.Evolution 23, 406–20.
Gauthreaux, S. A., Jr. (1978) The ecological significance of behavioral dominance. InPerspectives in Ethology, Vol. III. (P. P. G. Bateson and P. H. Klopfer, eds.) pp. 17–54. Plenum, New York, USA.
Goodwin, D. (1982)Estrildid Finches of the World. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Grant, P. R. (1979) Evolution of the chaffinch,Fringilla coelebs, on the Atlantic Islands.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 11, 301–32.
Grant, P. R. (1985)Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Yersey, USA.
Grant, P. R., Abbott, I., Schluter, D., Curry, R. L. and Abbott, L. K. (1985) Variation in the size and shape of Darwin's finches.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25, 1–39.
Grant, P. R., Grant, B. R., Smith, J. N. M., Abbott, I. and Abbott, L. K. (1976) Darwin's finches: population variation and natural selection.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 73, 257–61.
Howell, T. R. and Cade, T. J. (1954) The birds of Guadalupe Island in 1953.Condor 56, 283–94.
Krebs, J. R. (1979) Bird colours.Nature 282, 14–16.
Lima, S. L., Wiebe, K. L. and Dill, L. M. (1987) Protective cover and the use of space by finches: is closer better?.Oikos 50, 225–30.
Lyon, B. E. and Montgomerie, R. D. (1985) Conspicuous plumage of birds: sexual selection or unprofitable prey?Anim. Behav. 33, 1038–40.
Martin, A. C., Zim, H. S. and Nelson, A. L. (1951)American Wildlife and Plants. Dover, New York.
Newton, I. (1967) The adaptive radiation and feeding ecology of some British finches.Ibis 109, 33–98.
Newton, I. (1972)Finches. Collins, London.
Olson, S. L. and James, H. F. (1982) Prodromus of the fossil avifauna of the Hawaiian Islands.Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 365, 1–59.
Pagel, M. D. and Harvey, P. H. (1988) Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data.Quart. Rev. Biol. 63, 413–40.
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) Mechanics of flight. InAvian Biology, Vol. 5. (D. S. Farner and J. R. King, eds) pp. 1–75. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Power, D. M. (1980) Evolution of land birds on the California Islands.The California Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium. (D. M. Power, ed.) pp. 613–49. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Pratt, H. D., Bruner, P. L. and Berrett, D. G. (1987)The Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Pulliam, H. R. (1980) Do chipping sparrows forage optimally?Ardea 68, 75–82.
Pulliam, H. R. (1983) Ecological community theory and the coexistence of sparrows.Ecology 64, 45–52.
Pulliam, H. R. (1985) Foraging efficiency, resource partitioning and the co-existence of sparrow species.Ecology 66, 1829–36.
Pulliam, H. R. and Dunning, J. P. (1987) The influence of food supply on local density and diversity of sparrows.Ecology 68, 1009–14.
Pulliam, H. R. and Enders, F. (1971) The feeding ecology of five sympatric finch species.Ecology 52, 557–66.
Pulliam, H. R. and Millikan, G. (1982) Social organization in the nonreproductive season.Avian Biology, Vol. VI (D. S. Farner and J. R. King, eds) pp. 169–97. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Pulliam, H. R. and Mills, G. S. (1977) The use of space by sparrows.Ecology 58, 1393–99.
Pulliam, H. R. and Parker, T. A. III (1979) Population regulation of sparrows.Fortschr. Zool. 25, 137–47.
Pulliam, H. R., Pyke, G. H., Caraco, T. (1982) The scanning behavior of juncos: a game-theoretical approach.J. Theor. Biol. 95, 89–103.
Raikow, R. J. (1977) The origin and evolution of the Hawaiin honeycreepers (Drepanididae).Living Bird 15, 95–117.
Schluter, D. (1988a) Character displacement and the adaptive divergence of finches on islands and continents.Amer. Nat. 131, 799–824.
Schluter, D. (1988b) The evolution of finch communities on islands and continents: Kenya vs. Galápagos.Ecol. Monogr. 58, 229–49.
Schluter, D. and Grant, P. R. (1984) Determinants of morphological patterns in communities of Darwin's finches.Amer. Nat. 123, 175–196.
Schneider, K. J. (1984) Dominance, predation, and optimal foraging in white-throated sparrow flocks.Ecology 65, 1820–27.
Sibley, C. G. and Ahlquist, J. E. (1982) The relationships of the Hawaiian honeycreepers (Drepaninini) as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization.Auk 99, 130–40.
Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. and Strohmeier, K. (1985) Predation competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 269–311.
Smith, J. N. M., Grant, P. R., Grant, B. R., Abbott, I. J. and Abbott, L. K. (1978) Seasonal variation in feeding habitats of Darwin's ground finches.Ecology 59, 1137–50.
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981)Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, USA.
Verner, J. and Willson, M. F. (1969) Mating systems, sexual dimorphism, and the role of male North American passerine birds in the nesting cycle.Amer. Ornithol. Union Ornithol. Monogr. 9.
Weathers, W. W. and Riper, C. van, III (1982) Temperature regulation in two endangered Hawaiian honeycreepers: the Palila (Psittirostra bailleui) and the Laysan Finch (Psittirostra cantrans).Auk 99, 667–74.
Welty, J. C. (1975)The Life of Birds. 2nd ed. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, USA.
Werner, E. E., Gilliam, J. F., Hall, D. J. and Mittlebach, G. G. (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish.Ecology 64, 1540–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benkman, C.W. Predation, seed size partitioning and the evolution of body size in seed-eating finches. Evol Ecol 5, 118–127 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270828
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270828