Skip to main content
Log in

Reversal of IAA-induced inhibition of flowering by aminoethoxyvinylglycine inChenopodium

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) applied as a droplet (3 μl, 0.1 mM) to the plumule of seedlings of both the short-day plantChenopodium rubrum and the long-day plantChenopodium murale counteracted to a great extent or even canceled the inhibition of flowering due to exogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). This effect was more pronounced with the two substances administered simultaneously than with later application of AVG alone. AVG by itself in some cases promoted the percentage of flowering in bothChenopodium species. Application of IAA to the shoot apex was shown to elevate ethylene production in both species, whereas application of AVG alone was shown to suppress it. Thus, ethylene may be considered an active agent of flowering inhibition brought about by IAA application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amrhein N, Schneebeck D (1980) Prevention of auxin-induced epinasty by α-aminooxyacetic acid. Physiol Plant 49:62–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blake TJ, Reid DM, Rood SB (1983) Ethylene, indoleacetic acid and apical dominance in peas: A reappraisal. Physiol Plant 59:481–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khatoon S, Seidlová F, Krekule J (1973) Time-dependence of auxin and ethrel effects on flowering inChenopodium rubrum L. Biol Plant 15:361–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krekule J, Přívratský J (1974) The shoot apex as the site of an inhibitory effect of applied auxin on photoperiodic induction of flowering in the short-day plantChenopodium rubrum L. Z Pflanzenphysiol 71:345–348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krekule J, Pavlová L, Součková D, Macháčková I (1985) Auxin in flowering of short-day and long-dayChenopodium species. Biol Plant (in press)

  • Lang A (1961) Auxins in flowering. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology XIV. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 909–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M (1979) Biosynthesis and action of ethylene. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 30:533–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkey TJ, Kuzmanoff KM, Evans ML (1982) Promotion of growth and hydrogen ion efflux by auxin in roots of maize pretreated with ethylene biosynthesis inhibitors. Plant Physiol 70:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Přívratský T, Tykva R, Krekule J (1976) The possible role of auxin in reversing photoperiodic induction of flowering in a short-day plant,Chenopodium rubrum L. Z Pflanzenphysiol 78:377–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidlová F, Khatoon S (1976) Effects of indol-3yl acetic acid on floral induction and apical differentiation inChenopodium rubrum L. Ann Bot 40:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann J, Seidlová F, Krekule J, Pavlová L (1985)Chenopodium rubrum as a model plant for testing the flowering effects of PGRs. Biol Plant (in press)

  • Yang SF, Hoffman NE (1984) Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35:155–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macháčková, I., Krekule, J., Součková, D. et al. Reversal of IAA-induced inhibition of flowering by aminoethoxyvinylglycine inChenopodium . J Plant Growth Regul 4, 203–209 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266958

Keywords

Navigation