Abstract
Auxin-induced growth, epidermal cell length, cellular osmotic potential, and cell wall composition of coleoptile segments excised from one normal and two dwarf rice strains were studied 2, 3, 4, and 5 days after soaking. The auxin-induced growth was higher at the early stages of coleoptile growth and decreased with age, being always higher in normal than in the two dwarf strains. A good correlation between auxin-induced growth and auxin-induced decrease in the minimum stress-relaxation time has been found, suggesting that the different growth capacity in response to auxin among the three different strains is due to differences in the structure of their cell walls. In fact, cell wall analysis revealed that (1) the relative α-cellulose content of the cell walls was higher in the two dwarf strains than in the normal one, and (2) the auxin-induced decrease in noncellulosic glucose was high, compared with dwarf strains, in the normal strain, which showed the higher auxin-induced growth, showing a highly significant correlation between the decrease in noncellulosic glucose and the growth in response to auxin. Thus, the different growth between normal and dwarf strains might be attributed to their different capacity to degrade β-glucan of their cell walls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cleland R (1971) Cell wall extension. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 22:197–222
Harada J, Vergara BS (1972) Growth patterns of tall and short lines of rice and their response to gibberellin. Ann Bot 36:571–577
Inouhe M, Sakurai N, Kuraishi S (1982) Growth regulation of dark-grown dwarf barley coleoptile by the endogenous IAA content. Plant Cell Physiol 23:689–698
Jones RL (1983) The role of gibberellins in plant cell elongation. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 1:23–47
Kato Y, Ito S, Iki K, Matsuda K (1982) Xyloglucan and β-D-glucan in cell walls of rice seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 23:351–364
Kuraishi S (1974) Biogenesis of auxin in barley. In: Plant growth substances 1973. Hirokawa, Tokyo, pp. 209–216
Lockhart JA (1958) The response of various species of higher plants to light and gibberellic acid. Physiol Plant 11:478–486
Lockhart JA, Gottschall V (1959) Growth responses of Alaska pea seedlings to visible radiation and gibberellic acid. Plant Physiol 34:460–465
Masuda Y (1978) Auxin-induced cell wall loosening. Bot Mag Tokyo (special issue) I:103–123
Masuda Y, Yamamoto R, Kawamura H, Yamagata Y (1974) Stress-relaxation properties of the cell wall of tissue segments under different growth conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 15:1083–1092
Murakami Y (1968) A new rice seedling test for gibberellins. “Microdrop method” and its use for testing extracts of rice and morning glory. Bot Mag 81:33–43
Nevins DJ (1975) The effect of nojirimycin on plant growth and its implications concerning a role for exo-β-glucanase in auxin-induced cell expansion. Plant Cell Physiol 16:347–356
Ricard JR, Nitsch JP (1958) Intervention of natural substances other than 3-indole-acetic acid in the growth of young coleoptiles of wheat. C R Acad Sci Ser III-Vie 247:1891–1893
Sakurai N, Inouhe M, Masuda Y, Kuraishi S (1983) Growth regulation in dwarf barley coleoptiles by the minor cell wall components, galactose and mannose. Plant Cell Physiol 24:317–325 325
Sakurai N, Kuraishi S (1984) Sugar composition, intrinsic viscosities and molecular weights of hemicellulosic polysaccharides of the coleoptile cell walls in a semi-brachytic and a normal type barley. Plant Cell Physiol 25:955–963
Sakurai N, Kuraishi S, Inouhe M, Masuda Y (1984) Growth and stress-relaxation parameters for the cell wall of normal and 10 dwarf barley strains. Plant Cell Physiol 25:721–729
Sakurai N, Masuda Y (1977) Effect of indole-3-acetic acid on cell wall loosening: Changes in mechanical properties and noncellulosic glucose content ofAvena coleoptile cell wall. Plant Cell Physiol 18:587–594
Sakurai N, Masuda Y (1978) Auxin-induced cell elongation, cell wall loosening and changes in the wall polysaccharide content of barley segments. Plant Cell Physiol 19:1225–1233
Singh BD, Singh Y (1982) Dwarf mutants of rice (Oryza sativa) with partial block in gibberellin utilization. Biochem Physiol Pflanzen 177:789–791
Singh BD, Singh RP, Singh RB (1981) Endogenous gibberellins and amylase activity in tall and dwarf strains of rice (Oryza sativa). Experientia 37:363–364
Suge H (1972) Effect of uzu (uz) gene on the level of endogenous gibberellins in barley. Jpn J Genet 47:423–430
Suge H, Murakami Y (1968) Occurrence of a rice mutant deficient in gibberellin-like substances. Plant Cell Physiol 9:411–414
Terry ME, Bonner BA (1980) An examination of centrifugation as a method of extracting an extracellular solution from peas, and its use for the study of indoleacetic acid-induced growth. Plant Physiol 66:321–325
Wada S (1961) Growth patterns of rice coleoptiles grown on water and under water. Sci Rep Tohoku Univ Ser IV (Biol) 27:199–207
Wakhloo JL (1975) Hormonal regulation of hypocotyl elongation inLactuca sativa L. Evidence against the involvement of gibberellin. J Exp Bot 28:841–852
Yamamoto R, Fujihara S, Masuda Y (1974) Measurement of stress-relaxation properties of plant cell walls. In: Plant growth substances 1973. Hirokawa, Tokyo, pp 798–805
Zarra I, Masuda Y (1979a) Growth and cell wall changes in rice coleoptiles growing under different conditions. I. Changes in turgor pressure and cell wall polysaccharides during intact growth. Plant Cell Physiol 20:1117–1124
Zarra I, Masuda Y (1979b) Growth and cell wall changes in rice coleoptiles growing under different conditions. II. Auxin-induced growth in coleoptile segments. Plant Cell Physiol 20:1125–1133
Zhao YJ, Kamisaka S, Masuda Y (1983) Osmoregulation in hypocotyls of etiolated mung bean seedlings with or without cotyledons in response to water-deficient stress. Bot Mag Tokyo 96:211–222
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Revilla, G., Zarra, I. & Masuda, Y. Growth capacity in response to auxin of coleoptile segments of normal and dwarf rice strains. J Plant Growth Regul 4, 159–168 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266953
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266953