Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of various hyphenated chromatography — Mass spectrometry methods for the analysis of β-agonists

  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Different chromatography — mass spectrometry techniques for the analysis of β-agonists have been compared.

Gas chromatography — mass spectrometry (electron impact) has been used, as also has liquid chromatography coupled to the mass spectrometer by either thermospray or electrospray interfaces. The results obtained by the three method were compared in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, and richness of information provided by the analysis. It was found that using electrospray ionization, very powerful analysis could be achieved with high sensitivity, thus providing significant potential for the analysis of β-agonists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. O. Fiems, Ann. Zootech.,36, 271 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. C. Dumasia, E. Houghton, J. Chromatogr.,564, 503 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Polettini, M. C. Ricossa, A. Groppi, M. Montagna, J. Chromatogr.,564, 529 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. A. Van Gintel, G. W. Stephany, H. J. van Rossum, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.,75, 554 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. J. Forster, K. L. Roninger, E. Ecker, H. Peil, A. Wittrock, Biomed. Environm. Mass Spectrom.,17, 417 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Girault, P. Gobin, J. B. Fourtillan, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom.,19, 80 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. S. Leloux, R. A. A. Maes, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom.,18, 137 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Maurer, K. Pfleger J. Chromatogr.,382, 147 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. S. Leloux, E. G. De Jong, R. A. A. Maes, J. Chromatogr.,488, 357 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. J. Blachflower, D. G. Kennedy, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spetrom.,18, 935 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. S. Leloux, W. M. A. Niessen, R. A. M. Van Der Hoeven, Biol. Mass Spectrom.,20 647 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Walhagen, L. E. Edholm, C. E. M. Heeremans, R. A. M. Van Der Hoeven, W. M. A. Niessen, U. R. Tjaden, J. Van Der Greef, J. Chromatogr.,474, 257 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. leyssens, C. Driessen, A. Jacobs, J. Czech, J. Raus, J. Chromatogr.,564, 515 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. P. Bruins, J. Chromatogr.,554, 39 (1991), and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. D. Smith, J. A. Loo, C. G. Edmonds, C. J. Baringa, H. R. Udseth, Anal. Chem.,62, 882 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Perkins, C. E. Parker, K. B. Tomer, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.,3, 139 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. M. Johansson, R. Pavelka, J. D. Henion J. Chromatogr.559, 515 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Arpino, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem.,337, 667 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Arpino, Mass Spectrom. Rev.,9, 631 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Courtheyn, C. Desaever, R. Verhe, J. Chromatogr.,564, 537 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. H. D. Meyer, L. Rinke, I. Dürsch, J. Chromatogr.,564, 551 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Haasnoot, M. E. Ploum, R. J. A. Paulussen, R. Schilt, F. A. Huf, J. Chromatogr.519, 323 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. L. L. Duchateau, B. H. M. Munsters, G. T. C. Kwakkenbos, R. G. J. Van Leuken, J. Chromatogr.,552, 605 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. A. Loo, H. R. Udseth, R. D. Smith, Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom.,2, 207 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. Katta, S. K. Chowdhury, B. T. Chait, Anal. Chem.,63, 174 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Debrauwer, G. Bories, Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom.,6, 382 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. M. Whitehouse, R. N. Dreyer, M. Yamashita, J. B. Fenn, Anal. Chem.,57, 675 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Debrauwer, G. Bories, Anal. Chim. Acta, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire des Xénobiotiques, I.N.R.A., BP 3, 31931, Toulouse Cedex, France

    L. Debrauwer, G. Delous & G. Bories

Authors
  1. L. Debrauwer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Delous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Bories
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debrauwer, L., Delous, G. & Bories, G. Comparison of various hyphenated chromatography — Mass spectrometry methods for the analysis of β-agonists. Chromatographia 36, 218–224 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02263868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02263868

Key Words

Search

Navigation