Summary
The focus on discourse and communication in the recent sociology of scientific knowledge offers new perspectives for an integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches in science studies. The common point of interest is the question of how reflexive communication systems communicate. The elaboration of the mathematical theory of communication into a theory of potentially self-organizing entropical systems enables us to distinguish the various layers of communication, and to specify the dynamic changes in these configurations over time. For example, a paradigmatic discourse can be considered as a virtual communiction system at the supra-individual level. Communication systems, however, cannot be directly observed. One observes only their instantaneous operations. The reflexive analyst is able to attribute the observed uncertainty to hypothesized systems that interact in the events. The implications of this perspective for various programmes in the sociology of scientific knowledge are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amsterdamska, O.: 1990, ‘Surely you are joking, Monsieur Latour!’,Science, Technology and Human Values 15, 495–504.
Andersen, E. S.: 1994,Evolutionary Economics. Post-Schumpeterian Contributions, 1994, Printer, London.
Bar-Hillel, Y.: 1955, ‘An Examination of Information Theory’,Phil. Sci. 22, 86–105.
Bailey, K. D.: 1990, ‘WhyH does not measure information: the role of the “special case” legerdemain solution in the maintenance of anomalies in normal science’,Quality and Quantity 24, 159–71.
Bloor, D.: 1976,Knowledge and Social Imagery, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, etc.
Brillouin, L.: 1962,Science and Information Theory, Academic Press, New York.
Burt, R. S.: 1982,Toward a Structuralist Theory of Action, Academic Press, New York, etc.
Callon, M. and Latour, B.: 1981, ‘Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so’, in: Knorr-Cetina and Cicourel, 1981, pp. 277–303.
Callon, M. and Law, J.: 1982, ‘On interests and their transformation’,Social Studies of Science 12, 615–625.
Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., and Bauin, S.: 1983, ‘From Translations to Problematic Networks: An Introduction to Co-Word Analysis’,Social Science Information 22, 191–235.
Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (eds.): 1986,Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Macmillan, London.
Callon, M. and Courtial, J.-P.: 1989,Co-Word Analysis: A Tool for the Evaluation of Public Research Policy, Ecole Nationale, Supérieure des Mines, Paris.
Callon, M.: 1990, ‘Réseaux technico-économiques’, in: Boyer, R. (ed.),Figures de l'irreversibilité en économie, EHESS, Paris.
Carpenter, M. P. and Narin, F.: 1973, ‘Clustering of Scientific Journals’,Journals of the American Society for Information Science 24, 425–36.
Chubin, D. and Restivo, S.: 1983, ‘The “Mooting” of Science Studies: Research Programmes and Science Policy”, in: Knoor-Cetina and Mulkay, 1983, pp. 53–83.
Collins, H. M. and Yearly, S.: 1992, ‘Epistemological Chicken’, in: Pickering, 1992.
Courtial, J.-P.: 1989, ‘Qualitative Models, Quantitative Tools and Network Analysis’,Scientometrics 15, 527–34.
Cronin, B.: 1981, ‘The need for a theory of citation’.,Journal of Documentation 37, 16–24.
Doreian, P. and Fararo, T. J.: 1985, ‘Structural Equivalence in a Journal Network’,Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36, 28–37.
Dosi, G.: 1982, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technologcal Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’,Research Policy 11, 142–67.
Eco, U.: 1976,A Theory of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington/London.
Edge, D.: 1979, ‘Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review’,Hist. Sci. 17, 102–34.
Giddens, A.: 1979,Central Problems in Social Theory, Macmillan, London, etc.
Giddens, A.: 1984,The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Habermas, J. and Luhmann, N.: 1971,Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Hayles, N. K.: 1990,Chaos Bound; Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, etc.
Hesse, M.: 1980,Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Harvester Press, London.
Howson, C. and Urbach, P.: 1989,Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, Open Court, La Salle, Ill.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D.: 1981, ‘Introduction. The micro-sociological challenge to macro-sociology: towards a reconstruction of social theory and methodology’, in: Knoor-Cetina and Cicourel, 1981, 1–47.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. and Cicourel, A. V. (eds.):Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston/London.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. and Mulkay, M. J. (eds.): 1983Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, Sage, London.
Krippendorff, K.: 1986,Information Theory. Structural Models for Qualitative Data, Sage, Beverley Hills, etc.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.),Criticism and the Growth Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–196.
Langton, C. G.: 1989,Artificial Life, Addison Wesley, Redwood City, CA.
Langton, C. G., Taylor, C., Doyne Farmer, J., and Rasmussen, S.: 1992,Artificial Life II, Addison Wesley, Redwood City, CA.
Latour, B.: 1987a,Science in Action, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Latour, B.: 1987b, ‘The Prince for machines as well as for machinations’, in: Elliot, B. (ed.),Technology and Social Change. Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh, pp. 20–43.
Latour, B.: 1988,The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass./London.
Latour, B.: 1991, ‘The Impact of Science Studies on Political Philosphy’,Science, Technology & Human Values 16, 3–19.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1986, ‘The Development of Frames of Reference’,Scientometrics 9, 103–25.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1990, ‘Relations Among Science Indicators II. The Dynamics of Science’,Scientometrics 19, 271–96.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1991, ‘The Static and Dynamic Analysis of Network Data Using Information Theory’,Social Networks 13, 301–45.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1992a. ‘Knowledge Representations, Bayesian Inferences and Empirical Science Studies’,Social Science Information 31, 213–37.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1992b, ‘The Impact of EC Science Policies on the Transnational Publication System’,Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 4, 279–98.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1992c, ‘A Validation Study of LEXIMAPPE’,Scientometrics 25, 295–312.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1993a, ‘Is society a Self-Organizing System?’,Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 16, 331–49.
Leydesdorff, L.: 1993b, ‘“Structure”/“Action” Contingencies and the Model of Parallel Distributed Processing’,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23, 27–77.
Leydesdorff, L. and Cozzens, S. E.: 1993, ‘The Delineation of Specialties in Terms of Journals Using the Dynamic Journal Set of the Science Citation Index’,Scientometrics 26, 133–54.
Luhmann, N.: 1984,Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Luhmann, N.: 1990,Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
MacKay, D.: 1969,Information, Mechanism, and Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge.
MacRoberts, M. H., and MacRoberts, B. R.: 1987, ‘Another test of the normative theory of citing’,Journal of the American Society for Information Science 16, 151–72.
Maturana, H. R. and Varela, F.: 1980,Autopoieses and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Boston.
Mulkay, M., Potter, J., and Yearley, S.: 1983, ‘Why an Analysis of Scientific Discourse is Needed’, in: Knorr and Mulkay, 1983, pp. 171–204.
Parsons, T.: 1952, ‘Superego and the Theory of Social Systems’,Psychiatry 15, 15–25.
Pickering, A. (ed.): 1992,Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pinch, T.: 1982, ‘Kuhn — The Conservative and Radical Interpretations. Are Some Mertonians “Kuhnians” and Some “Kuhnians” Mertonians?’Society for the Social Studies of Science 7 (nr. 1), 10–25.
Pinch, T.: 1985, ‘Towards and Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidential Significance of Observational Reports in Physics’,Social Studies of Science 15, 3–36.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I.: 1979,La nouvelle alliance, Gallimard, Paris. [English translation:Order out of Chaos, Bantam Books, New York., 1984].
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., and the PDP Research Group: 1986,Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London.
Shannon, C. E.: 1958, ‘A Mathematical Theory of Communication’,Bell Technical Journal 27, 379–423 and 623–56.
Simon, H. A.: 1973, ‘The Organization of Complex Systems,’ in: Pattee, H. H. (ed),Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, George Braziller, New York, pp. 1–27.
Slezak, P. 1989, ‘Computer Discovery and the Strong Programme’,Social Studies of Science 19, 562–600.
Teubner, G.: 1987, ‘Hyperzyklus in Recht und Organisation. Zum Verhàltnis von Selbstbeobachtung, Selbskonstitution und Autopoiese’. In: Haferkmap, H. and Schmidt, M. (eds.),Sinn, Kommunikation und Soziale Differenzierung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M., pp. 89–128.
Theul, H.: 1972,Statistical Decomposition Analysis, North Holland, Amsterdam/London.
Tijssen, R. J., de Leeuw, J., and van Raan, A. F. J.: 1987, ‘Quasi-Correspondence Analysis on Square Scientometric Transaction Matrices’,Scientometrics 11, 347–61.
Whitley, R. D.: 1984,The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Woolgar, S.: 1988,Science. The very idea, Sage, Beverly Hills/London, etc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leydesdorff, L. The possibility of a mathematical sociology of scientific communication. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27, 243–265 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02262616
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02262616