Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the influence of mineral content and porosity on ultrasound parameters in bone by using synthetic phantoms

  • Published:
Mechanics of Composite Materials Aims and scope

Abstract

Model composite media − 10×15×80 mm3 bone tissue phantoms based on an epoxy resin with fillers—were made to study the influence of porosity and mineral content on ultrasound velocity and attenuation. The pores were simulated by ∼ 1 mm3 particles of a soft rubber, while the mineral content was imitated by a mineral residue of natural bone obtained by burning and grinding. The porosity and mineral content were varied in the range of 0–70% by volume with a step of 10%. The velocity, attenuation, and prevalent frequency of ultrasound were measured by the pulse transition method, using transducers with nominal frequencies 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 MHz. It was experimentally found that the ultrasound velocity decreased nearly exponentially with growth in porosity, while the velocity dispersion was negligible at frequencies >0.2 MHz; the ultrasound attenuation increased linearly with growth in porosity and strongly depended on the frequency; the velocity increased nonlinearly with growth in mineral content above 40%; the attenuation did not exhibit a distinct dependence on the mineral content; the porosity provoked a shift in the prevalent frequency of transducers, tending to the common value of 0.2 MHz, while the mineral content did not excite similar changes. The complex measurement of velocity, frequency-dependent attenvation, and prevenlent frequency of ultrasound is proposed in ultrasonic diagnostics of bone for more precise determination of the influence of the porosity and the degree of mineralization on the bone condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Abendshein and G. W. Hyatt, “Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone,” Clinical Orthopaedics, No. 69, 294–301 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. N. McCarthy, L. B. Jeffcott, and R. N. McCartney, “Ultrasound speed in equine cortical bone: effects of orientation, density, porosity, and temperature,” J. Biomech.,23, No. 11, 1139–1143 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Clarke, J. A. Evans, J. G. Truscott, R. Milner, and M. A. Smith, “A phantom for quantitative ultrasound of trabecular bone,” Phys. Med. Biol.,39, 1677–1687 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. M. Cleek, B. C. Lentle, and D. L. Kendler, “The Vancouver calcaneal ultrasound phantom,” Osteoporosis Int.,7, No. 3, 295 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Tremple, R. Morris, and R. Nord, “Phantoms for Achilles ultrasonometry,” Osteoporosis Int.,7, No. 3, 297 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. Martin, “Determinants of mechanical properties of bone,” J. Biomech.,24, Suppl. 1, 79–88 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. L. V. Avioli and S. M. Krane (eds.), Metabolic Bone Disease and Clinically Related Disorders, 2nd ed., W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. R. Piekarski, “Morphology and fracture of bone,” in: Fracture 1977, Proc. 4 Int. Conf. Fracture. Vol. 1, Waterloo, Canada (1977), pp. 607–642.

  9. F. Melsen, B. Melsen, L. Mosekilde, and S. Bergmann, “Histomorphometric analysis of normal bone and iliac crest,” Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand.,86, 70–81 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. A. Goss, R. L. Johnston, and F. Dunn, “Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.,64, No. 2, 423–467 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. B. Shaffler, and D. B. Burr, “Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density,” J. Biomech,21, 13–16 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. D. Currey, “The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone,” J. Biomech.,21, 131–139 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. H. Burstein, J. M. Zika, K. G. Heiple, and L. Klein, “Contribution of collagen and mineral to the elastic-plastic properties of bone,” J. Bone Joint Surg.,57A, 956–961 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published in Mekhanika Kompozitnykh Materialov, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 211–220, March–April, 1999.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tatarinov, A., Pontaga, I. & Vilks, U. Modeling the influence of mineral content and porosity on ultrasound parameters in bone by using synthetic phantoms. Mech Compos Mater 35, 147–154 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257245

Keywords

Navigation