Skip to main content
Log in

Interval-dependent inhibition of morphine sensitization of ambulation in mice by post-morphine treatment with naloxone or restraint

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ambulation-increasing effect of morphine (10 mg/kg SC) persisted for approximately 3 h with a peak effect at around 1 h after the administration. This was examined on four occasions at 3-day intervals. Thus, treatment regimen-induced sensitization and the 3-h overall activity in the fourth administration was about 1.7 times higher than that in the first administration. Post-morphine treatments with naloxone (1 mg/kg SC) at 0 (i.e., simultaneously with) to 30 min after each morphine administration almost completely inhibited the induction of morphine sensitization. However, post-morphine treatments with naloxone at 1 h and later had no such inhibitory effect. Similarly, physical restriction of the ambulation of mice for 3 h (restraint), by putting them in a jar (6 cm in diameter, and 15 cm in height) inhibited the induction of morphine sensitization when restrain was started 0–30 min after each administration of morphine. Restraint starting 1 h and later did not alter the morphine sensitization. Post-morphine treatment with saline at any times did not change morphine sensitization. Furthermore, repeated administration of saline alone, naloxone alone, and saline with naloxone post-treatment or restraint did not change the sensitivity to morphine. These results clearly indicate that free ambulation for at least 1 h after the administration of morphine, i.e., the latency to reach the peak effect, is required completely to induce sensitization to morphine in terms of ambulation in mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie EA, Keefe KA, Difrischia DS, Zigmond MJ (1989) Differential effect of stress on in vivo dopamine release in striatum, nucleus accumbens, and medial frontal cortex. J Neurochem 52:1655–1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxbaum DM, Yarbough GG, Garter ME (1973) Biogenic amines and narcotic effects. I. Modifications of catecholamine levels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 185:317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Deroche V, Piazza PV, Casolini P, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H (1992) Stress-induced sensitization to amphetamine and morphine psychomotor effects depends on stress-induced corticosterone secretion. Brain Res 598:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch AY, Tam SY, Roth RH (1985) The determinants of stress-induced activation of the prefrontal dopamine system. Prog Brain Res 85:367–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty MD, Gratton A (1992) High-speed chromoamperometric measurement of mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine release associated with repeated daily stress. Brain Res 586:295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka M, Hirabayashi M (1983) Enhancing effect of morphine on ambulatory activity produced by repeated administration in mice. Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi 82:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperato A, Puglisi-Allegra S, Casolini P, Angelucci L (1991) Changes in brain dopamine and acetylcholine release during and following stress are independent of the pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Brain Res 538:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto ET (1981) Locomotor activity and antinociception after putative mu, kappa and sigma receptor agonists and antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 217:451–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuribara H (1995a) Modification of morphine sensitization by opioid and dopamine receptor antagonists: evaluation by studying ambulation in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 275:251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuribara H (1995b) Inhibitory effect of restraint on induction of behavioral sensitization to methamphetamine and cocaine in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (in press)

  • Kuribara H, Tadokoro S (1989) Reverse tolerance to ambulation-increasing effects of methamphetamine and morphine in 6 mouse strains. Jpn J Pharmacol 49:197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuschinsky K, Hornykiewicz O (1974) Effects of morphine on striatal dopamine metabolism: possible mechanism of its opposite effect on locomotor activity in rats and mice. Eur J Pharmacol 26:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani A, Battaini F, Kobayashi H, Spano PF, Trabucci M (1980) Genotype-dependent sensitivity: role of different opiate receptor populations. Brain Res 189:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Rethy CR, Smith CB, Villarreal JE (1971) Effect of narcotic analgesics upon the locomotor activity and brain catecholamine content of the mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 176:472–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaham Y, Kelsey JE, Stewart J (1995) Temporal factors in the effect of restraint stress on morphine-induced behavioral sensitization in the rat. Psychopharmacology 117:102–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Vaccarino FJ, Koob FG (1985) Effects of naloxone on heroin-, amphetamine- and caffeine-stimulated locomotor activity in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 23:499–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum H, Giammatteo P, Mickley GA (1979) Differential effects of localized lesions of n. accumbens on morphine- and methamphetamine- induced locomotor hyperactivity in the C57BL/6J mouse. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:745–751

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuribara, H. Interval-dependent inhibition of morphine sensitization of ambulation in mice by post-morphine treatment with naloxone or restraint. Psychopharmacology 125, 129–134 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249411

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249411

Key words

Navigation