Summary
Because of the importance in some field studies of above crop liquid precipitation measurements, in this article an interpretation and an error assessment of above maize precipitation measurements are given. With Snowdon rain gauges from 20 to 40 cm above the maize, errors seem not to be higher than with a 40 cm Snowdon gauge above grass, as long as the wind field is again adjusted to new roughness conditions and turbulence is not enhanced otherwise. Differences found between gauges correctly and incorrectly exposed were relatively small due to the fact that the maize growing season falls clearly within the period of lowest influence of wind on rain gauge catch in the Netherlands. The use of comparative measurements between a 40 cm Snowdon gauge above grass and Snowdon ground level gauges installed following latest W. M. O.-recommendations appeared to be indispensable for ultimate error assessment.
Zusammenfassung
Wegen der Bedeutung von Messungen des flüssigen Niederschlages über Vegetationsbeständen bei manchen Feldstudien wird in dieser Arbeit eine Interpretation und Fehlerschätzung für Niederschlagsmessungen über Maisfeldern gegeben. Bei Messungen mit Regenmessern nach Snowdon von 20 bis 40 cm Höhe über Maisfeldern scheinen die Fehler nicht größer zu sein als bei Messungen mit einem 40 cm-Snowdon-Regenmesser über Gras, sobald das Windfeld sich wieder an die neuen Rauhigkeitsverhältnisse angeglichen hat und die Turbulenz nicht auf andere Art vergrößert worden ist. Die Unterschiede, die zwischen den Angaben von richtig und nichtrichtig exponierten Regenmessern gefunden wurden, sind zufolge der Tatsache, daß in den Niederlanden die Wachstumsperiode von Mais gerade in die Zeit fällt, in der der Wind den kleinsten Einfluß auf Regenmesser hat, relativ klein. Vergleichsmessungen mit einem 40 cm-Snowdon-Regenmesser über Gras und einem Bodenregenmesser nach Snowdon, der nach den letzten WMO-Empfehlungen aufgestellt ist, scheinen für eine endgültige Fehlerschätzung unerläßlich zu sein.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. M. O.: Annotated Bibliography on Precipitation Measurement Instruments. WHO/IHD. Projects Report 17, WMO-No. 343, 1–278 (1973).
Leyton, L., E. C. R. Reynolds and F. B. Thompson: Interception of Rainfall by Trees and Moorland Vegetation, p. 97–108 in: Wadsworth, R. M. (Ed.): The Measurement of Environmental Factors in Terrestrial Ecology, Oxford: Blackwell Sc. Publ., 1968.
Kalma, J. D., G. Stanhill and E. Urieli: Rainfall Interception and Stemflow in an Orange plantation. Isr. J. agric. Res.18, 3–14 (1968).
Rogerson, T. L., and W. R. Byrnes: Net Rainfall under Hardwoods and Red Pine in Central Pennsylvania. Water Resources Res.4, 55–57 (1968).
Levert, C.: De betrekkelijke waarde van de meting met één regenmeter. Hemel en Dampkring59, 133–139 (1961).
Sandsborg, J.: Local Variations in Rainfall over Small, Flat, Cultivated Areas. Tellus21, 673–684 (1969).
Watkins, L. H.: Variation between Measurements of Rainfall Made with a Grid of Gauges. Meteorol. Mag.84, 350–354 (1955).
Helvey, J. D., and J. H. Patric: Canopy and Litter Interception of Rainfall by Hardwoods of Eastern United States. Water Resources Res.1: 193–206 (1965).
Monteith, J. L.: Evaporation and Environment, p. 205–234 in: The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, Proceed. XIX Symp. Soc. exp. Biol., Cambr. Univ. Pr., 1964.
Szeicz, G.: Comments on the Value of Some Wetting Experiments in Studies of Crop Evaporation. Water Resources Res.6, 347–348 (1970).
Stigter, C. J.: Leaf Diffusion Resistance to Water Vapour and Its Direct Measurement. I. Introduction and Review Concerning Relevant Factors and Methods. Meded. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen72–3: 1–47 (1972).
Stigter, C. J.: The Epidermal Resistance to Diffusion of Water Vapour: an Improved Measuring Method and Field Results in Indian Corn (Zea mays). Agric. Res. Rep.831, Wageningen: PUDOC, 1974.
Waggoner, P. E., J. E. Begg and N. C. Turner: Evaporation of Dew. Agric. Meteorol.6: 227–230 (1969).
Glover, J., and M. D. Gwynne: Light Rainfall and Plant Survival in East Africa. I. Maize. J. Ecol.50: 111–118 (1962).
Rodda, J. C.: The Systematic Error in Rainfall Measurement. J. Inst. Water Eng. (London)21: 173–177 (1967).
Rodda, J. C.: The Precipitation Measurement Paradox—The Instrument Accuracy Problem. W. M. O./I. H. D. Projects Report 16, W. M. O.-No. 316, 1–42 (1971).
Harrang, C.: La mesure des précipitations. Monographie de la météorologie nationale No.78: 1–83 (1970).
Handcock, D. E.: Routine Measurement of Precipitation, p. 177–202 in: Agricultural Meteorology, Proceed. W. M. O. Seminar, Melbourne (Australia), 1968.
Rodda, J. C.: On the Questions of Rainfall Measurement and Representativeness. p. 173–186 in: World Water Balance, Vol. 1. IASH/UNESCO/WMO: Studies and Reports in Hydrology11 (1972).
W. M. O.: Commission for Instruments and Methods of Observation. Abridged Final Report of the Fifth Session. W. M. O.-No. 252. R. P. 82 (1969).
Rodda, J. C.: The Precipitation Component of the Water Balance. Its Problems and Prospects. W. M. O. Bull.19: 102–105 (1970).
W. M. O.: Guide to Meteorological Instrument and Observing Practices, 4th edition, W. M. O.-No. 8. T. P. 3 (1971).
Meteorological Office: Handbook of Meteorological Instruments. I. Instruments for Surface Observations. H. M. S. O., London, 1969.
Stigter, C. J. and B. Lammers: Leaf Diffusion Resistance to Water Vapour and Its Direct Measurement. III. Results Regarding the Improved Diffusion Porometer in Growth Rooms and Fields of Indian Corn (Zea mays). Meded. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen74-21: 1–76 (1974).
Reynolds, E. R. C.: Dew in Raingauges. Meteorol. Mag.93, 213–217 (1964).
Tanner, C. B.: Measurement of Evapotranspiration. Ch. 26 in: R. M. Hagan et al. (Ed.). Irrigation of Agricultural Lands. Agronomy series No. 11, Am. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, 1967.
Dyer, A. J.: The Role of Fetch in Plant Studies, p. 493–498 in: F. E. Eckardt (Ed.): Functioning of Terrestrial Ecosystems at the Primary Production Level. Nat. Resources Res. Ser. V, UNESCO, Paris, 1968.
Braak, C.: Influence of the Wind on Rainfall Measurements. Meded. Verhand. K. N. M. I.48: 52–74 (1945).
de Zeeuw, J. W.: Over de werkelijkheidsbenadering van gemeten neerslagen. Landbouwk. Tijdschr.75 (14): 815–832 (1963).
Colenbrander, H. J., and Ph. Th. Stol: Neerlag en neerslagverdeling naar plaats en tijd. Deelrapport5 in: Hydrologisch onderzoek in het Leerinkbeekgebied, Arnhem, 1970.
Mueller, C. C., and E. H. Kidder: Rain Gage Catch Variation due to Airflow Disturbances Around a Standard Rain Gage. Water Resources Res.8: 1077–1082 (1972).
de Laine, R. J.: Measuring Rainfall on Forest Catchments. J. Hydrol.9: 103–112 (1969).
Schnock, G.: Réception des précipitations suivant un transect sol-cime dans une chênaie mixte. Oec. Plant.8: 17–23 (1973).
Kalma, J. D., J. Lomas, M. Thaller and Y. Shashona: An Accurate Small Orifice Rain Gauge. Water Resources Res.5: 300–305 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With 7 Figures
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stigter, C.J. Precipitation measurements above a maize crop. Arch. Met. Geoph. Biokl. B. 24, 95–108 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02243389
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02243389