Skip to main content
Log in

Needle liver biopsy in benign and malignant disease: Comparison of the Menghini and Vim-Silverman technics

  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. A retrospective study of a series of 568 percutaneous liver biopsies performed on 518 patients is reported. Of the 568 biopsies, 382 were done with the Vim-Silverman needle, and 126 with the Menghini needle. In 56 instances, the needle used was not recorded but most probably was the Vim-Silverman one.

2. About 75 per cent of biopsies in patients with suspected carcinoma without adequate proof of liver metastases were positive for metastatic disease of the liver.

3. In patients with nonmalignant liver disease, 72 per cent of the biopsies served a useful clinical purpose in establishing or refuting a diagnosis.

4. At least two deaths—and possibly three—were related to the procedure, resulting in a mortality of 0.6 per cent in 518 patients, or 0.5 per cent in 568 biopsies. There were no deaths in the 126 Menghini-type biopsies.

5. The incidence of mortality and morbidity was no greater in patients with metastatic liver disease than in those with benign liver disease.

6. Metastatic liver disease is not a contraindication to liver biopsy and the latter may be of great help in clinical management of the patient.

7. Percutaneous liver biopsy is a simple and quite safe procedure when supervised by experienced physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zamcheck, W., andSidman, R. L. Needle biopsy of the liver. I. Its use in clinical and investigative medicine.New England J. Med. 249:1020, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ward, J., Ulevitch, H., andSchiff, C. The diagnostic value of needle biopsy of the liver.Gastroenterology 28:34, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tyor, M. P., andCayer, D. The differential diagnosis of jaundice; the relative value of the clinical impression, laboratory tests and aspiration liver biopsy.Gastroenterology 24:63, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Menghini, G. One-second needle biopsy of the liver.Gastroenterology 3:190, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berk, J. E., andShay, H. Liver biopsy and liver function tests: Complimentary role in diagnosis of liver disease.J.A.M.A. 148: 109, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman, I. Liver needle biopsy.Am. J. Surg. 40:671, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schaffner, F. The clinical utilization of liver biopsy.M. Clin. North America 44: 709, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Terry, R. B. Macroscopic diagnosis in liver biopsy.J.A.M.A. 154:990, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weisbrod, F. A., Schiff, L., Gall, E. A., Cleveland, F. A., andBerman, J. R. Needle biopsy of the liver. III. Experiences in the differential diagnosis of jaundice.Gastroenterology 14:56, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ward, J., Ulevitch, H., andSchiff, L. The diagnostic value of needle biopsy of the liver.Gastroenterology 28:34, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parets, A. D., Schaffner, F., andBlack, H. Percutaneous liver biopsy with the Menghini needle.Am. J. Dig. Dis. 4:693, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ward, J., Schiff, L., Young, P., andGall, E. A. Needle biopsy of the liver. II. Further experiences with malignant neoplasm.Gastroenterology 27:300, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson, R. S., andSalvador, D. S. J. Percutaneous needle liver biopsy in malignant neoplasm with special reference to myeloid metaplasia.Ann. Int. Med. 53:179, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parets, A. D. Detection of intrahepatic metastases by blind needle liver biopsy.Am. J. M. Sc. 237:335, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer, C. J., andFaloon, W. W. Needle biopsy of the liver; Comparison of initial clinical and histological diagnosis, with a note on post-biopsy mortality in patients with metastatic neoplasm.Am. J. Med. 25:368, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Battaglia, P. S., Brown, C. H., andMcCormack. Needle biopsy of the liver in hepatic malignancy.Gastroenterology 38:801, 1960 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Terry, R. Risks of needle biopsy.Brit. M. J. 1:1102, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zamcheck, W., andKlausenstock, O. Liver biopsy. II. The risks of needle biopsy.New England J. Med. 249:1062, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, J.G., Simon, M., Zimetbaum, M. et al. Needle liver biopsy in benign and malignant disease: Comparison of the Menghini and Vim-Silverman technics. Digest Dis Sci 7, 687–698 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236107

Keywords

Navigation