Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 243–253 | Cite as

The influence of soil moisture and flooding on formation of VA-endo- and ectomycorrhizae in Populus and Salix

  • D. J. Lodge
Article

Abstract

Native mixtures of extomycorrhizal fungi were found to infect Populus and Salix roots primarily in very moist but well drained soils in both the field and in controlled experiments (0 to −0.2 MPa), whereas native mixtures of VA-endomycorrhizal fungi infected roots over a much wider range of soil moisture (flooded to −3.4 MPa). Although a moisture gradient experiment showed endomycorrhizal formation was greater in moist soil than in very dry or flooded soils, this pattern was reversed in field transects along drainage gradients. Infection by VA-endomycorrhizal fungi in the field was the lowest where infection by ectomycorrhizal fungi was high, which suggests possible antagonism among the fungal symbionts. The narrow moisture range for ectomycorrhizal formation, and antagonism among endo- and ectomycorrhizal fungi, apparently combine to produce the mycorrhizal distributions found in nature.

Key words

ectomycorrhizal fungi flooding Populus deltoides Salix nigra soil moisture VA-endomycorrhizal fungi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cassell D K and Klute A 1986 Water potential: Tensiometry.In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Second Ed. Eds. A Klute, G S Campbell, R D Jackson, M M Mortland and D R Nielsen. pp 563–633. Am. Soc. of Agronomy, Inc., Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc., Madison WI, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Chilvers G A, Lapeyrie F F and Horan D P 1987 Ectomycorrhizalvs endomycorrhizal fungi within the same root system. New Phytol. 107, 441–448.Google Scholar
  3. Dominik T 1958 Study of mycotrophism of the genus Populus.In Study on Mycotrophy of Forest Trees. Prace Instytutu Badawczego Lésnictwa 181, 117–172. English translation, TT 60-21227/LL. NTIS, US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield VA 22161, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Filer T H Jr. 1975 Mycorrhizae and soil microflora in a green tree reservoir. For. Sci. 21, 36–39.Google Scholar
  5. Fontana A 1961 Primo contributo allo studio delle micorrize dei pioppi in peimonte (First contribution to the study of poplar mycorrhizas in Piedmont). Allionia 7, 87–129.Google Scholar
  6. Giovanetti M and Mosse B 1980 An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular infection in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500.Google Scholar
  7. Harley J L 1959 The Biology of Mycorrhiza. Leonard Hill (Books) Ltd., London and Interscience, Pub. Inc., N.Y., 233p.Google Scholar
  8. Harley J L and Smith S E 1983 Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press Inc., N.Y. and London, 483p.Google Scholar
  9. Keeley J E 1980 Endomycorrhizae influence growth of blackgum seedlings in flooded soils. Am. J. Bot. 67, 6–9.Google Scholar
  10. Khan, A G 1974 The occurrence of mycorrhizas in halophytes, hydrophytes and xerophytes, and of Endogone spores in adjacent soils. J. Gen. Microbiol. 81, 7–14.Google Scholar
  11. Kormanik P P and McGraw A-C 1983 Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.In Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research. Ed N C Schenk. pp 37–57. Am. Phytopath. Soc., St. Paul, Minn. USA.Google Scholar
  12. Lodge D J 1985 Ecology of Ecto- and Endomycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Eastern Cottonwood Roots. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Botany, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Lodge D J and Wentworth T R Negative associations among VA-endomycorrhizal fungi and some ectomycorrhizal fungi inhabiting the same root system. Oikos (In press).Google Scholar
  14. Lorio P L Jr., Howe V K and Martin C N 1972 Loblolly pine rooting varies with microrelief on wet sites. Ecology 53, 1134–1140.Google Scholar
  15. Marx D H, Bryan W C and Davey C B 1970 Influence of temperature on aseptic symthesis of ectomycorrhizae byThelephora terrestris andPisolithus tinctorius on loblolly pine. For. Sci. 16, 424–431.Google Scholar
  16. Mexal J and Reid C P P 1973 The growth of selected mycorrhizal fungi in response to induced water stress. Can. J. Bot. 51, 1579–1588.Google Scholar
  17. Mmbaga M T 1979 A comparative study of V-A mycorrhiza in paddy and upland rice in seven localities in Tanzania. Fourth N. Am. Conf. on Mycorrhizae. Colorado St. Univ., Ft. Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Miller O K 1977 Some observations on the ecology of arctic mycorrhizal fungi. Third N. Am. Conf. on Mycorrhizae, p 56. Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Nespiak A 1953 Research on mycotrophism of the alpine vegetation in the granite parts of the Tatra Mountains over the limit ofPinus Mughus. English Translation 1961, TT-60-21390/LL, 22 pp. US Dept. of Commerce, NTIS, Springfield VA 22161, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Read D J and Armstrong W 1972 A relationship between oxygen transport and the formation of ectotrophic mycorrhizal sheath in conifer seedlings. New Phytol. 71, 49–53.Google Scholar
  21. Reid C P P and Bowen G D 1979 Effects of soil moisture on VA mycorrhizae formation and root development in Medicago.In The Soil-Root Interface. Eds. J L Harley and R S Russel. Academic Press, London. 211 p.Google Scholar
  22. Saif S R The Influence of soil aeration on the efficiency of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. I. Effect of soil oxygen on the growth and mineral uptake ofEupatorium odoratum L. inoculated withGlomus macrocarpus. New Phytol. 88, 649–659.Google Scholar
  23. Shuja N, Gilani U and Khan A G 1971 Mycorrhizal associations in some angiosperm trees around New University Campus, Lahore. Pak. J. For. 21, 367–374.Google Scholar
  24. Sieverding E 1981 Influence of soil water regimes on VA mycorrhiza. I. Effect on plant growth, water utilization, and development of mycorrhiza. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 150, 400–411.Google Scholar
  25. Snedecor G W and Cochran W G 1980 Statistical Methods. Iowa State Press. Ames, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
  26. SSSA 1986 Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physiological and Mineralogical Methods, Second Ed. Eds. A. Klute, G S Campbell, R D Jackson, M M Mortland and D R Nielsen. Am. Soc. of Agronomy, Inc., Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc., Madison WI, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Trappe J M 1982 Synoptic keys to the genera and species of zygomycetous (vesicular-arbuscular) mycorrhizal fungi. Phytopathology 72, 1102–1108.Google Scholar
  28. Truszkowska W 1953 Mycotrophy ofAlneta in the Białowieza National Park and in Domaszyn near Wrocław. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. English translation 1964 TT-61-11334/LL, US Dept. of Commerce, NTIS, Springfield VA 22161, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E and Sprugel D G 1989 Methodological considerations in measuring biomass, production, respiration and nutrient resorption for tree roots in natural ecosystems.In Continuous and Steady State Methods in Root Biology. Eds. L J Winship, J G Torrey and W Silvester. Martinus Nijhoff, Dr W Junk, Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Vozzo J A and Hacskaylo E 1974 Endo- and ectomycorrhizal associations in fivePopulus species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 101, 182–186.Google Scholar
  31. Wilcox H E 1971 Morphology of the ectendomycorrhizae inPinus resinosa.In Mycorrhizae. Ed. E Hacskaylo. pp 54–68. USDA Forest Serv. Misc. Pub. 1189. Supt. Doc., Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Lodge
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Energy and Environment ResearchSan JuanUSA

Personalised recommendations