Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rethinking the role of U. S. development assistance in third world agriculture

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International agricultural development as practiced by U. S. sponsored research groups in developing countries has emphasized technical questions of production, ignoring more fundamental social and economic issues that underline rural poverty and hunger. Rethinking the role of U. S. development assistance will require transcending the view that the only way to impact agriculture in the Third World is by increasing the intensity of land use in high potential agricultural areas. The challenge is to find ways of how to further increase agricultural productivity so that the rural poor significantly benefit, while at the same time conserving and regenerating the resource base. U. S. scientists must realize that this is only possible by improving the access of resource-poor farmers to land, water, other natural resources, as well as to equitable credit, markets, appropriate technologies, etc. Solidarious collaboration will emerge from the U. S. siding with progressive governments and/or community-based initiatives that promote political change aimed at securing farmers' control over resources and inputs, and changing the structural conditions and policies that perpetuate poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. W., A. H. Ellingbae and E. C. Rossineau, 1971. “Biological uniformity and disease epidemics,”BioScience. 21: 1067–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., 1987.Agroecology: The scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. and M. K. Anderson, 1986. “An ecological basis for the development of alternative agricultural systems for small farmers in the Third World,”Am. J. of Alternative Agriculture. 1: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., M. K. Anderson and L. C. Merrick, 1987. “Peasant agriculture and the conservation of crop and wild plant resources,”Conservation Biology. 1: 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokenshaw, D. W., D. M. Warren and D. Warner, 1980.Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., 1983.Rural development: putting the last first. Essex: Longman Group, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. and B. P. Ghildyal, 1985. “Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: the farmer first and last model,”Agric. Adm. 20: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. R., 1986.Agroecosystem analysis for research and development. Bangkok: Winrock International Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry, A., 1981.The agrarian question and reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry, A., D. Runstem and E. Sadoulet, 1987.Technological innovations in Latin American agriculture. IICA Program Paper Series. San Jose, Costa Rica.

  • Dewey, K. G., 1981. “Nutritional consequences of the transformation from subsistence to commercial agriculture in Tabasco, Mexico,”Human Ecology. 9: 151–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R., 1976. “Genetic resources in wild relatives of crops,”Crop Sci. 16: 324–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbelink, H., 1987.Biotechnology and Third World agriculture: new hope or false promise? Brussels: Int. Coalition for Development Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, B. H., 1988.Foundations of international agricultural research: science and politics in Mexican agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee, G. A., 1980.World systems of traditional resource management. New York, N.Y.: J. Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W., 1980.The poverty of nations. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment, 1988.Enhancing agriculture in Africa: a role for U. S. development assistance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, E., 1986.Peasant agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: Joint ECLAC/FAO, Agriculture Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. 1985.Indigenous Agricultural Revolution. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. Souza, 1988. “The Contradictions of the Biorevolution for the Development of Agriculture in the Third World: Biotechnology and Capitalist Interests;”Agriculture and Human Values 5, 3: 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M., J. Carabias, C. Mapes and C. Toledo, 1985.Ecologia y autosuficiencia alimentaria. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno, Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wambi, B., 1988. “Domination by ‘cooperation’, a Third World perspective on technology transfer and information,”IDRC Reports. (January 1988): 24–25.

  • Wolf, E. C., 1986.Beyond the Green Revolution: new approaches for Third World agriculture. World Watch Paper 73. Washington, D.C.: World Watch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A., 1984. “Innocents abroad: American agriculture research in Mexico,” in:Meeting the Expectations of the Land, pp. 135–151. W. Jacksonet al., eds. Berkeley, CA: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Miguel A. Altieri is Associate Professor at the Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley. He teaches courses in agroecology and rural development, agroforestry, and biological control. His research emphasizes the development of sustainable agricultural systems both in California and in Latin America.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altieri, M.A. Rethinking the role of U. S. development assistance in third world agriculture. Agric Hum Values 6, 85–91 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217671

Keywords

Navigation