Skip to main content
Log in

The legitimacy of the agricultural extension service

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, the Swedish Agricultural Extension Service has delivered technical information to farmers with the aim of increasing productivity and efficiency in farming. Present problems with overproduction of food and the negative social and environmental consequences of present farm practices has brought this traditional mission in question. In a situation of budgetary constraints it has been suggested that the funding of the governmental Agricultural Extension Service should be cut down or even discontinued altogether

The article argues that this would be a mistake. The various negative consequences of modern agriculture indicate that we are far from an ideal mode of agricultural production. Instead, public opinion and new guidelines for agricultural and environmental policies call for substantial changes in Swedish agriculture with respect to pollution, preservation of non-renewable resources, maintaining an open rural landscape, ethical aspects of animal production, rural development etc.

This reorientation of Swedish agriculture presumes that decision-makers, farmers, and the public at large get an opportunity to learn more about the complexities of agricultural production. In contributing to this learning process the Agricultural Extension Service would have an important mission. To be able to fulfill this mission, extension professionals must be provided an opportunity to learn a broader concept of productivity and efficiency in agriculture, for instance, how to extend cost-benefit analyses and technical criteria of efficiency to include social, environmental, and ethical aspects. Our present extension staff has not received adequate training for this task. It is suggested that all agricultural colleges need to create departments of Rural Sociology and Agricultural Humanities to provide agricultural students and professionals an opportunity to develop a better understanding of agriculture and make them prepared to take on the challenges and responsibilities they confront in developing our future agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, Mats and Svante Axelsson, 1988. “Bondernas arbets—och livsvillkor.” (“Farmers' Working and Living Conditions”).Examensarbete nr. 4, Department of Extension Education, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

  • Carlson, Robert A. 1970. “Cooperative Extension: A Historical Assessment.”Journal of Extension, Vol. VIII (Spring, 1970), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, Lars. 1987. “The Value of Preserving the Agricultural Landscape.” 5th European Congress of Agricultural Economists, Balatoaszeplak, Hungary, August, 1987 (mimeo).

  • Nitsch, Ulrich. 1972. “Farmers' Problems in Practice Adoption and the Role of the Agricultural Extension Agent.” Department of Extension Education, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch, Ulrich. 1977. “Reinforcement of Official Goals of the Swedish National Board of Agriculture and District Agricultural Boards.” Department of Extension Education, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch, Ulrich. 1982. “Farmers' Perceptions of and Preferences Concerning Agricultural Extension Program.”Report 195, Department of Economics and Statistics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch, Ulrich. 1985. “Sarbara varden — Bonderna och det rationella jordbruks.” (“Vulnerable Values — Farmers and Modern Farming”).Fataburen (Yearbook of the Nordic Museum), Stockholm, 165–174.

  • OECD. 1980.Agricultural Advisory Services in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1962.Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. with F. Floyd Shoemaker. 1971.Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett, M., J.D. Eveland and Alden S. Bean. 1976.Extending the Agricultural Extension Model. Stanford, Calif.: Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. 1946.Jordbruks-statistisk Arsbok (Year-book of Agricultural Statistics), Stockholm.

  • Statistics Sweden. 1987.Jordbruks-statistick Arsbok (Year-book of Agricultural Statistics), Stockholm.

  • UNT. 1988.Uppsala Nya Tidning, April 6, 1988.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Ulrich Nitsch worked with Swedish farmers for several years as an advisory officer in the Swedish Agricultural Extension Service. After doctoral studies at the University of Wisconsin he joined the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Uppsala, where he is now a Professor in Agicultural Extension Education. His research interest is to look at extension work as an encounter between different rationalities i.e., the formal rationality of extension organizations and the substantive rationality pursued by farmers.

The author would like to thank Jeff Burkhardt, Richard Haynes, and Glenn Israel for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nitsch, U. The legitimacy of the agricultural extension service. Agric Hum Values 5, 50–56 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217648

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217648

Keywords

Navigation