Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teaching creativity with computers

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some criticize computer use because computers — by their nature mechanistic and algorithmic — support only uncreative thinking and production. However, adults increasingly view computers as valuable tools of creative production. Educational research indicates that there is no single “effect” of the computer on creativity; technology can support either uncreative drill or creative production. Research also provides strong evidence that certain computer environments, such as Logo, word processing, and design tools, hold the potential for the computer's facilitation of creativity. There is equally strong evidence that the curriculum in which computer programs are embedded and the teacher who chooses, uses, and infuses these programs, are essential elements in realizing the full potential of technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson, E., and Helgoe, C. (1993). Exploring art and technology. In Schuyten, G., and Valcke, M. (eds.),Teaching and Learning in Logo-Based Environment, IOS, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. (1984). Mathematical, geometric and spatial reasoning. In Pitcher, E. G., Feinburg, S. G., and Alexander, D. (eds.),Helping Young Children Learn (4th Ed.), Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH, pp. 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (March 1989). Research on Word Processing and Writing Instruction. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A metaanalysis of word processing in writing instruction.Rev. Educ. Res. 63(1): 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barfurth, M. A., and van Gelder, S. (1993) Drawbridges and window washers: Children's investigations of mechanical advantage with Lego/Logo. In Estes, N. and Thomas, M. (eds.),Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp. 423–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontá, P., and Silverman, B. (1993). Making learning entertaining. In Estes, N. and Thomas, M. (eds.),Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1150–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisk, M. E. (1985). Using the computer to develop literacy.Equity Choice 1(3): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., and Reynolds, C. R. (eds.),Handbook of Creativity, London, New York, pp. 3–32.

  • Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., and Jay, M. (1992). Computers in a community of learners. In De Corte, E., Linn, M. C., Mandl, H., and Verschaffel, L. (eds.),Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, pp. 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L. J., and Flower, L. (1989). Foundations for creativity in the writing process. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., and Reynolds, C. R. (eds.),Handbook of Creativity, London, New York, pp. 283–303.

  • Carmichael, H. W., Burnett, J. D., Higginson, W. C., Moore, B. G., and Pollard, P. J. (1985).Computers, Children and Classrooms: A Multisite Evaluation of the Creative Use of Microcomputers by Elementary School Children, Ministry of Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S. M., Lehrer, R., Connell, T., and Erickson, J. (1992). Learning by hypermedia design Issues of assessment and implementation.Educ. Psychol. 27: 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, D., McBride, B., and Cartwright, C. (1992). Toward creativity: Educating the college student in computer programming.J. Res. Comput. Educ. 25(2): 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, A. E., and Pegley, K. (1991) An Assessment of a Technology in Music Programme Technical Report 91-2, Centre for the Study of Computers in Education, ERIC Documen Reproduction Service No. ED 341 364, North York, Ontario, Canada.

  • Clements, D. H. (1986). Effects of Logo and CAI environments on cognition and creativity.J. Educ. Psychol. 78: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (1987a): Computers and literacy. In Vacca, J. L., Vacca, R. T., and Govi, M. (eds.),Reading and Learning to Read, Little, Brown, Boston, pp. 338–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (1987b). Computers and young children: A review of the research.Youth Child, 43(1): 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (1990). Metacomponential development in a Logo programmir environment.J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (1991). Enhancement of creativity in computer environments.Am. Educ. Res. J. 28: 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Gullo, D. F. (1984). Effects of computer programming on you children's cognition.J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 1051–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Meredith, J. S. (1993a). Research on Logo: Effects and efficacy.Comput. Childhood Educ., 4: 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Meredith, J. S. (1993b). My turn: A talk with the Logo turtle.Arithmetic Teacher. 41: 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Meredith, J. S. (1994).Turle Math.TM Logo Computer Systems, Inc. (LCSI), Montreal, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Merriman, S. L. (1988). Componential developments in Logo programming environments. In Mayer, R. (ed.),Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: Multiple Research Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 13–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Nastasi, B. K. (1985). Effects of computer environments on social-emotional development: Logo and computer-assisted instruction.Comp. Schools 2(2–3): 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Nastasi, B. K. (1988). Social and cognitive interactions in educational computer environments.Am. Educ. Res. I. 25: 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., and Nastasi, B. K. (1992). Computers and early childhood education. In Gettinger, M., Elliott, S. N., and Kratochwill, T. R. (eds.),Advances in School Psychology: Preschool and Early Childhood Treatment Directions, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Kahn, J., and Paris, C. L. (1988). When word processors come into the classroom. In Hoot, J. L., and Silvern, S. B. (eds.),Writing with Computers in the Early Grades, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuffaro, H. K. (1984). Microcomputers in education: Why is earlier better?Teachers Coll. Rec. 85: 559–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. (1988). The early development of writing abilities: Two theoretical perspectives. In Hoot, J. L., and Silvern, S. B. (eds.),Writing with Computers in the Early Grades, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. B. (1984)Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A. J., and Bell, D. (February 1991). LEGO TC Logo: A study of children's learning.Logo Exchange 20–24.

  • Fisher, C. W. (1990/91). Some influences of classroom computers on academic tasks.J. Comput. Childhood Educ. 2: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., and Winner, E. (1982). First intimations of artistry. In Strauss, S. (ed.),U-Shaped Behavioral Growth, Academic Press, New York, pp. 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guddemi, M., and Mills, H. (1989). The impact of word processing and play training on literacy development.J. Comp. Childhood Educ. 1(1): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., and Goldsmith, L. T. (1992) Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation.Educ. Psychol. 27: 337–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. (1989). Software design for learning: On learning mathematics through instructional software design. In Ryan, W. C. (ed.),Proceedings of the National Educational Computing Conference, International Council on Computers for Education, Eugene, OR, pp. 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugland, S. W. (1992). Effects of computer software on preschool children's developmental gains.J. Comput. Childhood Educ. 3(1): 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawisher, G. E. (1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In Hawisher, G. E., and Selfe, C. L. (eds.),Critical Perspectives on Computers and Composition Instruction, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, B. A., and Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.),The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlawati, B. (1985). Effects of Logo and Problem-Solving CAI on the Cognitive Processes of Gifted Children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

  • Hofstadter, D. (1985).Metamagical Themas, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S. (1989). Artificial Intelligence, Education and Music: The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage and Facilitate Music Composition by Novices. Institute of Educational Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 452, Walton, Bletchley, Bucks, England.

  • Horton, J., and Ryba, K. (1986). Assessing learning with Logo: A pilot study.Comput. Teacher 14(1): 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C., and Noss, R. (1987). Synthesizing mathematical conceptions and their formalization through the construction of a Logo-based school mathematics curriculum.In. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 18: 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C., and Sutherland, R. (1989)Logo Mathematics in the Classroom, Routledge, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huenecke, D. (1992). An artistic criticism of Writing to Read, a computer based program for beginning readers.J. Curriculum Supervision 7: 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (1993) Minds in Play: Computer Game Design as a Context for Children's Learning. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Kull, J. A. (1988). Children learning Logo: A collaborative, qualitative study in the first grade.J. Res. Childhood Educ. 3: 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, R. J. (April 1988). Process Variables in Writing Instruction Using Word Processing, Word Processing with Voice Synthesis, and No Word Processing. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Lehrer, R., Levin, B. B., DeHart, P., and Comeaux, M. (1987). Voice-feedback as a scaffold for writing: A comparative study.J. Educ. Comput. Res. 3: 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitterer, J., and Rose-Drasnor, L. (1986). LOGO and the transfer of problem solving: An empirical test.Alberta J. Educa. Res. 32: 176–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., Clements, D. H., and Battista, M. T. (1990). Social-cognitive interactions, motivation, and cognitive growth in Logo programming and CAI problem-solving environments.J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989).Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, The Council, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhred, L. (1989) Word processing: Its impact on children's writing.J. Learning Disab. 22: 262–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Teaching children thinking; teaching children to be mathematicians vs. teaching about mathematics. In Taylor, R. (ed.),The Computer in the School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 161–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., Watt, D., diSessa, A., and Weir, S. (1979).Final Report of the Brookline Logo Project. Part II: Project Summary and Data Analysis (Logo Memo No. 53). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phenix, J., and Hannan, E. (1984). Word processing in the grade one classroom.Lang. Arts 61: 804–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, C. L., and Tomlinson, C. (1986). Computer writing: Linking literacies.Early Child Devel. Care 24: 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourde, R. R. (December 1987). The insignificance of Logo-stop “mucking around” with computers.Micro-Scope 30–31.

  • Reimer, G. (1985). Effects of a Logo computer programming experience on readiness for first grade, creativity, and self concept. “A pilot study in kindergarten.”AEDS Monitor 23(7–8): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (1988). LEGO, Logo, and design.Children's Environ. Quart. 5(4): 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H., and King, F. J. (1988).Assessing the Impact of Computer-Based Instruction: A Review of Recent Research, Haworth Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant, T. J. (1986). Using the microcomputer as a scaffold for assisting beginning readers and writers. In Hoot, J. (ed.),Computers in Early Childhood Education: Issues and Practices, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 128–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1992). An architecture for collaborative knowledge building. In De Corte, E., Linn, M. C., Mandl, H., and Verschaffel, L. (eds.),Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, pp. 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1985).Beyond IO, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988) A three-facet model of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.),The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L. E. (1985). Computers in pre-school education.Early Child Devel. Care 19: 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.),The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 43–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, S., and McKeeby, J. (September 1984). Computer turtle graphics: Do they affect children's thought processes?Educ. Technol. 46–47.

  • Weir, S. (1992). LEGO-Logo: A vehicle for learning. In Hoyles, C., and Noss, R. (eds.),Learning Mathematics and Logo, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiburg, K. M. (1987). The Effect of Different Computer-Based Learning Environments on Fourth Grade Students' Cognitive Abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

  • Wohlwill, J. F. (1988). Artistic imagination during the “latency period,” revealed through computer graphics. In Forman, G., and Pufall, P. B. (eds.),Constuctivism in the Computer Age, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M., Chazan, D., and Gordon, M. (1987).Guided Inquiry and Technology: A Year Long Study of Children and Teachers Using the Geometric Supposer: ETC Final Report, Educational Development Center, Newton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

    Douglas H. Clements

Authors
  1. Douglas H. Clements
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clements, D.H. Teaching creativity with computers. Educ Psychol Rev 7, 141–161 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212491

Key Words

Search

Navigation