Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized proximal point algorithm for convex optimization

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ha (Ref. 1) recently introduced a generalized proximal point algorithm for solving a generalized equation. In this note, we present a generalized proximal point algorithm for convex optimization problems based on Ha's work. The idea behind this algorithm is that, instead of adding a quadratic term to all the variables, we add a quadratic term to a subset of the variables. We extend the criteria for approximate solutions given by Rockafellar (Ref. 2) and Auslender (Ref. 3) and present convergence results. Finally, we show how this algorithm can be applied to solve block-angular linear and quadratic programming problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ha, C. D.,A Generalization of the Proximal Point Algorithm, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 28, pp. 503–512, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rockafellar, R. T.,Monotone Operators and the Proximal Point Algorithm, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 14, pp. 877–898, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auslender, A.,Numerical Methods for Nondifferentiable Convex Optimization, Mathematical Programming Study, Vol. 30, pp. 102–126, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rockafellar, R. T.,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rockafellar, R. T.,Augmented Lagrangians and Applications of the Proximal Point Algorithm in Convex Programming, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 1, pp. 97–116, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eckstein, J., andBertsekas, D. P.,On the Douglas-Rachford Splitting Method and the Proximal Point Algorithm for Maximal Monotone Operators, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 55, pp. 293–318, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Güller, O.,On the Convergence of the Proximal Point Algorithm for Convex Minimization, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 29, pp. 403–419, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wright, S. J.,Implementing Proximal Point Methods for Linear Programming, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 65, pp. 531–554, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hiriart-Urruty, J. B.,∈-Subdifferential Calculus, Convex Analysis and Optimization, Edited by J. P. Aubin and R. B. Vinter, Research Notes in Mathematics, Pitman, Boston, Massachusetts, Vol. 57, pp. 43–92, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nemirovsky, A. S., andYudin, D. B.,Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization, John Wiley and Sons, Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics, New York, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dantzig, G., andWolfe, P.,Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, Vol. 8, pp. 101–111, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ho, J. K., andLoute, E.,An Advanced Implementation of the Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition Algorithm for Linear Programming, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 20, pp. 303–326, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ho, J. K., andLoute, E.,Computational Experience with Advanced Implementation of Decomposition Algorithms for Linear Programming, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 27, pp. 283–290, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ho, J. K., andSundarraj, R. P.,DECOMP: An Implementation of Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition for Linear Programming, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer Verlag, New York, New York, Vol. 338, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ha, C. D.,Algorithms to Solve Large-Scale Structured Convex Programming Problems, PhD Dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1980.

  16. Robinson, S. M.,Bundle-Based Decomposition: Description and Preliminary Results, System Modelling and Optimization, Edited by J. Szelezsán, A. Prékopa, and B. Strazicky, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, Vol. 84, pp. 751–756, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Medhi, D.,Parallel Bundle-Based Decomposition for Large-Scale Structured Mathematical Programming Problems, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 22, pp. 101–127, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Medhi, D.,Bundle-Based Decomposition for Structured Large-Scale Convex Optimization: Error Estimate and Application to Block-Angular Linear Programs, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 66, pp. 79–101, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lemaréchal, C., Strodiot, J. J., andBihain, A.,On a Bundle Algorithm for Nonsmooth Optimization, Nonlinear Programming 4, Edited by O. L. Mangasarian, R. R. Meyer, and S. M. Robinson, Academic Press, New York, New York, pp. 245–282, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fletcher, R.,Practical Methods of Optimization, Wiley, Chichester, England, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by O. L. Mangasarian

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medhi, D., Ha, C.D. Generalized proximal point algorithm for convex optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 88, 475–488 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192181

Key Words

Navigation