Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-containment, computers and confidentiality

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The profession of social work has clear standards to follow in protecting confidentiality when a client discloses information in a psychotherapy session. These standards are examined in relation to an ever-increasing diresrefard for privacy as staff of managed care for mental health services and employee assistance programs gather and store information in computer databases, with the overall objective of cost-containment. Ethical principles are discussed and suggestions are made for safeguarding, the client's right to privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alperin, R. A. (1994). Managed care versus psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Conflicting ideologies.Clinical Social Work Journal, 22(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besharov, D. J., & Besharov, S. H. (1987). Techching about liability.Social Work, 32(6), 517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F. (1994). Resisting the pull of the health insurance tarbaby: An organizational model for surviving managed care.Clinical Social work Journal, 2(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, B. R., & Galaway, B. (1994).Social work processes (5th ed.). Belmontm, CA.: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. (1987). DSM-III and social work malpractice.Social Work, 32(3), 205–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, S. (1994, September). Managed care's challenge: “Show me!”NASW News, p. 3.

  • Levick, K. (1981). Privileged communication: Does it really exists?Social Casework, 62(4), 235–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews v. The Prudential Insurance Co. N.Y. Law J., 4/20/87, p. 16, coll (Civil Court, N.Y. Country).

  • National Association of Social Workers (1980).Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers. (1981).Standards for private practice of Clinical sosical work. In W. H. Cormeir and L. S. Cormier (1980).Intervewing strategies for helpers: Fundamental skills and cognitive behavioral interventions (3rd ed.). (pp. 604–607). Pacific Grove, Ca.: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reamer, F. G. (1993). AIDS and social work: The ethics and civil liberties agenda.Social Work,38(4), 412–419.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E. E. (1994, May 18). Open secrets: Medical data gathered by firms can prove less than condfidential.The Wall Street Journal., pp. 1, 5.

  • Schwarz, G. (1989). Confidentiality revisited.Social Work 34(3), 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watking, S. A. (1989). Confidentiality and privileged communications: Legal dilemma for family therapists.Social Work, 34(2), 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, L. (1988). State comparison of laws regulating social work. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidson, T., Davidson, J.R. Cost-containment, computers and confidentiality. Clin Soc Work J 23, 453–464 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191633

Keywords

Navigation