Skip to main content

Principles and Ethics of Collecting and Managing Health Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Health Data Methods for Policy and Practice
  • 735 Accesses

Abstract

Thomas and McNabb explore ethical issues associated with collecting and using data for public health. Distinguishing between ethics for medical research and for public health action, they identify unique challenges associated with maintaining health information systems. The authors emphasise the importance of ensuring data confidentiality, establishing principles for sharing data, determining availability and ownership of data, maintaining transparency, and using routine data to monitor health equity. They warn that, while data facilitate health action, speed of technological advances and escalation of data availability threaten society’s ability to maintain ethical principles, procedures, skills, and systems. Thomas and McNabb conclude that monitoring data ethics and training individuals to implement policies and procedures to guard them are urgent ethical imperatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winickoff D. Genome and nation: Iceland’s health sector database and its legacy. Innovations. technology, governance, globalization. 2006;1(2):80–105. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.80

  2. Thomas JC, Zuiker E, Millikan R, Genomics BR. Public health ethics. American Journal of Public Health. 2005 Dec;95(12):2139–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.066878

  3. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948 [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Public Health Service syphilis study at Tuskegee [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm

  5. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Washington, D.C., USA: Office of the Secretary; 1979. p. 4. [cited 2018 5th November]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

  6. Ko L. Unwanted sterilization and eugenics programs in the United States. 2016 [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/blog/unwanted-sterilization-and-eugenics-programs-in-the-united-states/

  7. Maher D. The ethics of feedback of HIV test results in population-based surveys of HIV infection. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013 Aug 23;91(12):950–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/blt.13.117309

  8. Thomas JC, Sage M, Dillenberg J, Guillory VJ, Dillenberg J, Guillory VJ. A code of ethics for public health. American Journal of Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1057–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.7.1057

  9. Braa J, Kanter AS, Lesh N, Crichton R, Jolliffe B, Sæbø J, et al., (Eds). Comprehensive yet scalable health information systems for low resource settings: a collaborative effort in Sierra Leone. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2010: American Medical Informatics Association. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041283/

  10. Heywood A, Boone D. Guidelines for data management standards in routine health Information systems. USAID, MEASURE Evaluation. 2015 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KB8N.pdf.

  11. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The collection, linking, and use of data in biomedical research and healthcare: ethical issues. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Biological_and_health_data_web.pdf

  12. Identify Theft Resource Center. Identity Theft Resource Center breach report hits record high in 2014. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.idtheftcenter.org/ITRC-Surveys-Studies/2014databreaches.html

  13. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). CIHR best practices for protecting privacy in health research: Ottawa. 2005 [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/et_pbp_nov05_sept2005_e.pdf

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data security and confidentiality guidelines frequently asked questions. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/programintegration/Data-Security-FAQ.htm

  15. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats, Knobler S, Mahmoud A, Lemon S, Mack A, Sivitz L, Oberholtzer K (Eds). Learning from SARS: Preparing for the next disease outbreak. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2004. 277–80 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christiansen C, Lou J. Ethical considerations related to evidence-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001 May 1;55(3):345–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.3.345

  17. Hopton SB. Topic and frame analysis of the Vietnamese news media’s coverage of Agent Orange, 2006–2014. Annual meeting of the International Social Network Analysis (ISNA) 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman S. Citizen science: the law and ethics of public access to medical big data. 2015 [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2491054

  19. Shu Y, McCauley J. GISAID: Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data–from vision to reality. Eurosurveillance. 2017 Mar 30;22(13). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.13.30494

  20. Butler D, Cyranoski D. Flu papers spark row over credit for data. Nature. 2013 May 1;497(7447):14–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/497014a

  21. Tangcharoensathien V, Boonperm J, Jongudomsuk P. Sharing health data: developing country perspectives. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2010 Jun 1;88(6):468–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/blt.10.079129

  22. van Panhuis WG, Paul P, Emerson C, Grefenstette J, Wilder R, Herbst AJ, et al. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BioMed Central Public Health. 2014 Nov 5;14(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144

  23. Research Fairness Initiative (RFI). Research Fairness Initiative: making research partnerships work for everyone [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://rfi.cohred.org/

  24. Chatham House. A guide to sharing the data and benefits of public health surveillance [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: https://datasharing.chathamhouse.org/

  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Standards to facilitate data sharing and use of surveillance data for public health action. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/programintegration/SC-Standards.htm-ELECTRONIC

  26. Vital Wave Consulting. Health information systems in developing countries. A landscape analysis. 2009 [cited 2018 5th November]. Available from: http://vitalwave.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Gates-Foundation-HIS-Analysis-2009.pdf

  27. AbouZahr C, Boerma T. Health information systems: the foundations of public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83:578–83. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/73153

  28. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB, Editors. Chapter 7. Principles of registry ethics, data ownership, and privacy. In. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide. Third ed. Rockville, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208620/

  29. Willyard C. Electronic records pose dilemma in developing countries. Nature Medicine. 2010 Mar;16(3):249–249. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0310-249a

  30. Rosenbaum S. Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access. Health Services Research. 2010 Aug 2;45(5p2):1442–55. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01140.x

  31. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health data principles [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-statistics

  32. World Health Organization. Health systems: Equity. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/equity/en/

  33. Global Equity Gauge Alliance. Equity Gauge profile. 2015 [cited 2018 10th March]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20110726114833/http://www.gega.org.za/profiles/chile.php

  34. Tugwell P, Sitthi-Amorn C, Hatcher-Roberts J, Neufeld V, Makara P, Munoz F, et al. Health research profile to assess the capacity of low and middle income countries for equity-oriented research. BioMed Central Public Health. 2006 Jun 12;6(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-151

  35. McCoy D, Bambas L, Acurio D, Baya B, Bhuiya A, Chowdhury AMR, et al. Global Equity Gauge Alliance: reflections on early experiences. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2003:273–87. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=McCoy+D%2C+Bambas+L%2C+Acurio+D%2C+Baya+B%2C+Bhuiya+A%2C+Chowdhury+AMR%2C+et+al.+Global+Equity+Gauge+Alliance%3A+reflections+on+early+experiences

  36. Moynihan R. Using health research in policy and practice: case studies from nine countries. Report No.: 1887748601. Washington, DC, USA: AcademyHealth, Millbank Memorial Fund; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vega J, Jadue L, Delgado I, Burgos R, Brown F, Marín F, et al. Disentangling the pathways to health inequities. The Chilean health equity gauge. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. 2002 [Cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cbb3/65de656b386fc9f5917b884fe887de521570.pdf?_ga=2.98577373.294827038.1535390931-867516760.1535390931

  38. Vayena E, Salathé M, Madoff LC, Brownstein JS. Ethical challenges of big data in public health. PLoS Computational Biology. 2015 Feb 9;11(2):e1003904. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003904

  39. Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, Brilliant L. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature. 2009 Feb;457(7232):1012–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07634

  40. Butler D. When Google got flu wrong. Nature. 2013 Feb 13;494(7436):155–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/494155a

  41. Yang S, Santillana M, Kou SC. Accurate estimation of influenza epidemics using Google search data via ARGO. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015 Nov 9;112(47):14473–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515373112

  42. Lazer D, Kennedy R. What we can learn from the epic failure of google flu trends. Wired. 2015 [cited 2018 10th March]. Available from: https://www.wired.com/2015/10/can-learn-epic-failure-google-flu-trends/

  43. Thomas JC. Contextual factors affecting receptivity to an information culture. Global Public Health. 2016 Nov 14;12(12):1568–78. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1256419

  44. Scofield M. Issues of data ownership Information-Management.com. 1998 [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.information-management.com/issues/19981101/296-1.html?zkPrintable=1&nopagination=1

  45. Principles for digital development. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: https://digitalprinciples.org/

  46. AcademyHealth. Connect, collaborate, communicate: The story of the EDM Forum. [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://www.academyhealth.org/EDMForumStory

  47. United Nations General Assembly. Fundamental principles of official statistics. Resolution 68/261. 2014 [cited 2018 26th January]. Available from: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/gp/FP-New-E.pdf

  48. Thomas JC. Public health ethics. In: Erwin PC, Brownson RC, editors. Principles of public health practice. Boston, USA: Cengage Learning; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thomas, J., McNabb, S. (2019). Principles and Ethics of Collecting and Managing Health Data. In: Macfarlane, S., AbouZahr, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Health Data Methods for Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54983-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54984-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics