Skip to main content
Log in

Nash refinement of equilibria

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method for choosing equilibria in strategic form games is proposed and axiomatically characterized. The method as well as the axioms are inspired by the Nash bargaining theory. The method can be applied to existing refinements of Nash equilibrium (e.g., perfect equilibrium) and also to other equilibrium concepts, like correlated equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nash, J. F.,Noncooperative Games, Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 54, pp. 286–295, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Damme, E. E. C.,Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harsanyi, J. C., andSelten, R.,A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information, Management Science, Vol. 18, pp. 80–106, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guth, W., andKalkofen, B.,Unique Solutions for Strategic Games: Equilibrium Selection Based on Resistance Avoidance, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aumann, R. J.,Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 67–96, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aumann, R. J.,Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality Econometrica, Vol. 55, pp. 1–18, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Selten, R.,Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 4, pp. 25–55, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Myerson, R. B.,Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 7, pp. 73–80, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalai, E., andSamet, D.,Persistent Equilibria in Strategic Games, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 13, pp. 129–144, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters, H., andVrieze, K.,Nash Equilibria, Report M91-02, University of Limburg, 1991.

  11. Nash, J. F.,The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica, Vol. 18, pp. 155–162, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harsanyi, J. C., andSelten, R.,A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tedeschi, P.,Bargained-Correlated Equilibria, Instituto di Economia Politica, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano, Italy, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aumann, R. J.,An Axiomatization of the Nontransferable Utility Value, Econometrica, Vol. 53, pp. 599–612, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griesmer, J. H., Hofmann, A. J., andRobinson, A.,On Symmetric Bimatrix Games, Research Paper RC-959, IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jansen, M. J. M., Potters, J. A. M., andTijs, S. H.,Symmetrizations of Two-Person Games, Methods of Operations Research, Vol. 54, pp. 385–402, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heuer, G. A., andMillham, C. B.,On Nash Subsets and Mobility Chains in Bimatrix Games, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 23, pp. 311–319, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. P. Papavassilopoulos

The authors thank the reviewers for their comments, which led to an improvement of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, H., Vrieze, K. Nash refinement of equilibria. J Optim Theory Appl 83, 355–373 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190062

Key Words

Navigation