Skip to main content
Log in

Matching to complex samples and stimulus class formation in adults with autism and young children

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adults with autism and young children first learned to match one-element comparison stimuli to two-element sample stimuli Test conditions then examined whether each of the individual sample elements (a) controlled selections of the comparison stimuli to which they were related during training, (b) were interchangeable with one another as either sample or comparison stimuli, and (c) were interchangeable with the original comparison stimuli. Test data were positive and suggested the formation of three-member stimulus classes. Subsequent experiments demonstrated the formation of four-member classes by (a) adding novel stimuli by training outside the original context; (b) adding novel stimulus elements to the two-element samples used during baseline training; and (c) training with three-element rather than two-element sample stimuli from the outset. Results suggest that acquisition of stimulus classes may be one of the benefits of broad rather than restricted attention to the components of complex stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, K. D., & Fuqua, R. W. (1985). Eliminating selective stimulus control: A comparison of two procedures for teaching mentally retarded children to respond to compound stimuli.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Stella, M. E., & Etzel, B. C. (1984). A reevaluation of stimulus overselectivity: Restricted stimulus control or stimulus control hierarchies.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. C. (1991). Some developmental implications of a disturbance in responding to complex environmental stimuli.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. C., & Cerniglia, L. (1990). Stimulus complexity and autistic children's responsivity: Assessing and training a pivotal behavior.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G. (1979). Teaching autistic children to use sign language: Some research issues.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., Binkoff, J. A., Kologinsky, E., & Eddy, M. (1978). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I: Expressive labelling.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 489–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., & Dores, P. A. (1981). Patterns of language acquisition following simultaneous communication with autistic children.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Remington, B., & Light, P. (1986). An evaluation of the relationship between receptive speech skills and expressive signing.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, W. V., Kledaras, J. B., Iennaco, F. M., Stoddard, L. T., & McIlvane, W. J. (1990). Observing complex visual stimuli: Effects of component pretraining.Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 8, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzel, B. C., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1979). The simplest alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless learning for the difficult-to-teach child.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L. J. (1969). Selective association and conditioning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 42–64). Halifax, Canada: Halhousie University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1974). The role of stimulus variables in teaching autistic children. In O. I. Lovaas & B. Bucher (Eds.),Perspectives in behavior modification with deviant children (pp. 537–546). New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litrownik, A. J., McInnis, E. T., Wetzel-Pritchard, A. M., & Filipelli, D. L. (1978). Restricted stimulus control and inferred attentional deficits in autistic and retarded children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 554–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., & Rehm, R. (1971). Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R. B. F., Dixon, L. S., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1986). Stimulus class formation following observational learning.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H. A. (1991). Stimulus equivalence: Implications for the development of adaptive behavior. In R. Remington (Ed,),The challenge of severe mental handicap: An applied behaviour analytic approach (pp. 235–259). London, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, R., & Mackay, C. K. (1982). Attention vs. retention in discrimination learning of low-MA retarded adults and MA-matched nonretarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1974).The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvane, W. J. (1992). Stimulus control analysis and nonverbal instructional methods for people with intellectual disabilities. In N. W. Bray (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 18, pp. 55–109). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvane, W. J. (1992). Stimulus control analysis and nonverbal instructional methods for people with intellectual disabilities. In N. W. Bray (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 18, pp. 55–109). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, B. A. (1969). Selective attention: The effects of combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 539–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, J. J. (1993). Emergent conditional discrimination in children: Matching to compound stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H. C., & Salzberg, C. L. (1982). Stimulus overselectivity in a match-to-sample paradigm by severely retarded youth.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 273–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreibman, L., Charlop, M. H., & Koegel, R. L. (1982). Teaching autistic children to use extra-stimulus prompts.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 475–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreibman, L., & Lovaas, O. I. (1973). Overselective response to social stimuli by autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1, 152–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.),Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K., Anderson, S. R., Marshall, A. M., & Baer, D. M. (1986). Establishing and generalizing audience control of new language repertoiresAnalysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. N., & Solman, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded: The blocking effect.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin, J. E., & Saunders, R. R. (1984). Behaving appropriately in new situations: A stimulus class analysis.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 574–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R. (1991). Stimulus equivalence: Implications for teaching. In W. Ishaq (Ed.),Human behavior in today's world (pp. 109–122). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A., & Stoddard, L. T. (1992). Classroom applications of stimulus equivalence technology.Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., & Mackay, H. A. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli i delayed matching to sample.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., McIlvane, W. J., & Serna, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence.Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples.Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes.Psychological Record, 40, 505–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1992). Formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples: Supplementary data.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 505–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touchette, P. T. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touchette, P. T., & Maguire, R. W. (1986, May).Stimulus control following discrimination of compound stimuli by autistic children. Paper presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.

  • Ullman, D. G. (1974). Breadth of attention and retention in mentally retarded and intellectually average children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 640–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varni, J. W., Lovaas, O. I., Doegel, R. I., & Everett, N. L. (1979). An analysis of observational learning in autistic and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, J. h., Zaparniuk, J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (1987). Mentally retarded adolescents' breadth of attention and short-term memory processes during matching-to-sample discriminations.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 92, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A. (1984). Stimulus control and associative learning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulz, S. V., & Hollis, J. H. (1979). Applications of manual sighing to the development of reading skills. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & J. H. Hollis (Eds.),Language intervention from ape to child (pp. 465–489). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research received support from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant HD25995, and the Massachusetts Department of Mental Retardation (Contract No. 100220023SC). Some of these data were collected with support and assistance from the staff of the New England Center for Autism. Experiment 1B is based on Russell Maguire's doctoral dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology, Northeastern University. We thank Bill Dube for his helpful comments on a draft of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maguire, R.W., Stromer, R., Mackay, H.A. et al. Matching to complex samples and stimulus class formation in adults with autism and young children. J Autism Dev Disord 24, 753–772 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172284

Keywords

Navigation