Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative appraisal of Picolax (sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate) in the preparation of the large bowel for elective surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The authors have investigated the metabolic sequelae Picolax bowel preparation in a group receiving their preparation either 24 hours (n=17) or 48 hours (n=18) before elective colonic resection. No significant changes in any metabolic parameter were found in the 24-hour group. In the 48-hour group, there was a significant decrease in serum sodium ( P <0.005), serum chloride ( P <0.005), pH ( P <0.005), HCO 3 (P <0.005), and base excess ( P <0.005). Only 16 of 35 cases (46 percent) had an acceptable bowel preparation: 11 of 17 (65 percent) in the 24-hour group and 5 of 18 (28 percent) in the 48-hour group. Marker studies did not correlate with the quality of bowel preparation. The risk of potentially explosive intraluminal gas was increased if the bowel preparation was poor: 12 of 19 patients (63 percent) with a poor bowel preparation compared with 3 of 16 patients (19 percent) of those with an acceptable preparation ( P <0.005). Picolax is a poor mechanical bowel preparation and is associated with unacceptable physiologic disturbance if given two days before surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1973;60:461–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gas Engineers Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1934:193–6.

  3. Keighley MR. A clinical and physiological evaluation of bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 1982;6:464–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Irving AD, Scrimgeour D. Mechanical bowel preparation for colonic resection and anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987:74:580–1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forth W, Nell G, Rummel W, Andres H. The hydrogogue and laxative effect of the sulphuric acid ester and the free diphenol of 4,4′-dihydroxydephenyl-(pyridyl-2)-methane. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1972;274:46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jauch R, Hankwitz R, Beschke K, Pelzer H. Bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-pyridyl-2-methane: the common laxative principle of bisacodyl and sodium picosulphate. Arzneimittelforschung 1975;25:1796–800.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delacey G, Benson M, Wilkins R, Spencer J, Cramer B. Routine colonic lavage is unnecessary for double-contrast barium enema in outpatients. Br Med J 1982;286:1021–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes K, Mann S, Cooke MB, James WB. A new oral bowel evacuant (Picolax) for colon cleansing. Clin Radiol 1983;34:75–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JR, Ferrando JR. Variables in the preparation of the large intestine for double contrast barium enema examination. Gut 1984;25:69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ducrotte P, Rodomanska B, Weber J, et al. Colonic transit time of radiopaque markers and rectoanal manometry in patients complaining of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:630–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Anorectal myectomy for outlet obstruction. Br J Surg 1987;74:373–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hares MM, Nevah E, Minervini S, Bentley S, Keighley M, Alexander-Williams J. An attempt to reduce the side effects of mannitol bowel preparation by intravenous infusion. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:289–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ambrose NS, Keighley MR. Physiological consequences of orthograde lavage bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a review. J Soc Med 1983;76:767–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DiPalma JA, Brady CE, Stweart DL. Comparison of colon cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1984;86:856–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ragins H, Shinya H, Wolff WI. The explosive potential of colonic gas during colonoscopic electrosurgical polypectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138:554–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprints will not be available.

About this article

Cite this article

Takada, H., Ambrose, N.S., Galbraith, K. et al. Quantitative appraisal of Picolax (sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate) in the preparation of the large bowel for elective surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 33, 679–683 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02150744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02150744

Key words

Navigation