Skip to main content
Log in

Indium-hydrogen complexes in silicon and germanium under compression and tension

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of hydrogen-acceptor complexes in silicon and germanium to the application of uniaxial mechanical stress was studied by means of the perturbed angular correlation technique. This hyperfine interaction technique is sensitive to the microscopic structure of the immediate lattice environment of the probe atom. For the measurements, the probe111In was introduced into Si and Ge crystals by ion implantation at room temperature. After annealing, the radioactive probe atom111In acts as an acceptor in the elemental semiconductors Si and Ge and as such can easily be passivated by hydrogen indiffusion. The resulting In-H complex was subsequently exposed to uniaxial compressive and tensile stress, which was produced by bending the crystals along the three major lattice directions 〈100〉, 〈110〉 and 〈111〉. It was found that the application of uniaxial mechanical stress causes no change in the population of the four equivalent bond centred H sites surrounding the In acceptor. Evidence was found for a large mismatch of the lattice parameters between the passivated In implanted layer and the surrounding pure Si.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.D. Watkins, in:Point Defects in Solids, Vol. 1, eds. J.H. Crawford and L.M. Slifkin (Plenum Press, New York, 1975) p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Skudlik, M. Deicher, R. Keller, R. Magerle, W. Pfeiffer, P. Pross, E. Recknagel and Th. Wichert, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 2172.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Bech Nielsen, J.U. Andersen and S.J. Pearton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.P. Herrero and M. Stutzmann, Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 12668.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.G. DeLeo and W.B. Fowler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Amore Bonapasta, A. Lapiccirella, N. Tomassini and M. Capizzi, Phys. Rev. B 36 (1987) 6228.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Estreicher, Phys. Rev. B 36 (1987) 9122.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K.J. Chang and D.J. Chadi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Stavola, K. Bergmann, S.J. Pearton and J. Lopata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 2786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.P. Biersack and L.G. Haggmark, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 174 (1980) 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.M. Steffen and K. Alder, in:The Electromagnetic Interaction in Nuclear Spectroscopy, ed. W.D. Hamilton (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975) p. 583.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.S. Hager et al., Nucl. Data Tables A 4 (1968) 397.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Herzog, K. Freitag, M. Reuschenbach and H. Walitzki, Z. Phys. A 294 (1980) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Th. Schaefer, Thesis, University of Bonn, Germany (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Wegner, Hyp. Int. 23 (1985) 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Marx and R. Vianden, Phys. Lett., submitted.

  17. U. Feuser, Thesis, University of Bonn, Germany (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.M. Myers, M.I. Baskes, H.K. Birnbaum, J.W. Corbett, G.G. DeLeo, S.K. Estreicher, E.E. Haller, P. Jena, N.M. Johnson, R. Kirchheim, S.J. Pearton and M.J. Stavola, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H.J. McSkimin, J. Appl. Phys. 24 (1953) 988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Stutzmann, J. Harsanyi, A. Breitschwerdt and C.P. Herrero, Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) 1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marx, G., Vianden, R. Indium-hydrogen complexes in silicon and germanium under compression and tension. Hyperfine Interact 97, 211–219 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02150177

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02150177

Keywords

Navigation