Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical and CT evaluation of a new stretch polytetrafluoroethylene aortic graft

  • Papers Presented at the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

A new stretch polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) aortic graft became available for clinical use in early 1991. We prospectively evaluated our first 107 stretch aortic PTFE grafts by means of serial CT imaging and compared them with a cohort of concurrently placed Dacron grafts. Stretch PTFE requires no preclotting and is claimed to resist long-term dilation and conform well to anastomoses. Consecutive patients undergoing placement of stretch PTFE grafts were seen at least yearly. Within the first 2 years after implantation, contrast-enhanced CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis were obtained. Caliper measurements were made of the native arteries and the body and any limbs of the aortic grafts. Graft elongation was assessed by noting distortions from the normally circular or minimally ovoid configuration of the grafts on transverse CT images. Indications for grafting were elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 60 patients, aortoiliac occlusive disease in 31, both aneurysm and occlusive disease in eight, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in eight. The overall operative mortality rate was 6.5%. There were two early postoperative graft limb thromboses resulting from hypercoagulable states, and there was one graft infection. Mean follow-up was 14.1 months (range 1 to 34 months). CT scans were obtained from 61 patients with stretch PTFE grafts and 10 with concomitantly placed Dacron grafts. Ten patients had two or more postoperative CT scans. Primary stretch PTFE patency was 98% and secondary patency, 100%. There was significantly less dilation of both the graft body and limbs in the stretch PTFE group (body mean 16.5%, range 6.3% to 28.1%; limb mean 19.3%, range 10% to 43%) compared to the Dacron group (body mean 33%, range 22% to 78%; limb mean 62%, range 12.5% to 88.9%) (p <0.01,unpaired t test). Those patients with serial scans showed no dilation beyond the first scan. No evidence of elongation, kinking, or pseudoaneurysm was noted in any of the stretch PTFE grafts. For a moderate follow-up interval, the new stretch PTFE grafts have performed exceptionally well. There appears to be significantly less dilation with these grafts as compared with Dacron grafts over the same time interval, and there has been no evidence of graft elongation to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cintora J, Pearce DE, Cannon JA. A clinical survey of aortobi-femoral bypass using two inherently different graft types. Ann Surg 1988;208:625–630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lord RSA, Nash PA, Raj BT, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polytetrafluoroethylene and Dacron aortic prosthesis. I. Perioperative results. Ann Vasc Surg 1988;2:248–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Polterauer P, Prager M, Holzenbein TH, et al. Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene for Y-aortic bifurcation grafts: A six-year prospective randomized trial. Surgery 1992;111:626–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nunn DB, Freeman MH, Hudgins PC. Postoperative alterations in size of Dacron aortic grafts. Ann Surg 1989;189:741–745.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alimi Y, Juhan C, Morati N, et al. Dilation of woven and knitted aortic prosthetic grafts: CT scan evaluation. Ann Vasc Surg 1994;8:238–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergamini TM, Bandyk DF, Govostis D, et al. Infection of vascular prostheses caused by bacterial biofilms. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:21–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitt DD, Bandyk DF, Pequet AJ, et al. Bacterial adherence to vascular prostheses, a determinant of graft infectivity. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:732–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quiñones-Baldrich WJ, Ziomek S, Henderson T, et al. Primary anastomotic bonding in polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:311–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbott WM, Callow AD, Moore W, et al. Evaluation and performance standards for arterial prostheses. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:746–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Voorhees AB Jr, Jaretzki A III, Blakemore AH. The use of tubes constructed from Vinyon “N” cloth in bridging arterial defects. Ann Surg 1952;135:332–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP, Smith RF, et al. A thirty-year survey of the reconstructive surgical treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:421–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berman SS, Hunter GC, Smyth SH, Erdoes LS, McIntyre KE, Bernhard VM. Application of computed tomography for surveillance of aortic grafts. Surgery 1995;118:8–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenlaugh RM. Dilation and stretching of knitted Dacron grafts associated with failure. In Bergan JJ, Yao JT, eds. Surgery of the Aorta and Its Body Branches. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freischlag JA, Moore WS. Clinical experience with a collagen-impregnated knitted Dacron vascular graft. Ann Vasc Surg 1990;4:449–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Drury JK, Ashton TR, Cunningham JD, et al. Experimental and clinical experience with a gelatin-impregnated Dacron prosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg 1987;1:542–547.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quindon R, Snyder R, Martin L, et al. Albumin coating of a knitted polyester arterial prosthesis: An alternative to pre-clotting. Ann Thorac Surg 1984;37:457–465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel M, Kaplan A, Sauvage LR, et al. Comparative evaluation of the elasticity and flexibility of bioimpregnated knitted grafts. Ann Vasc Surg 1992;6:127–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vohra R, Drury JK, Shapiro D, et al. Sealed versus unsealed knitted Dacron prostheses: A comparison of the acute phase protein response. Ann Vasc Surg 1987;1:548–551.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Mol van Otterloo JCA, Van Bockel JH, Ponfoort ED, et al. The effects of aortic reconstruction and collagen impregnation of Dacron prostheses on the complement system. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:774–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shepard AD, Gelfand JA, Callow AD, et al. Complement activation by synthetic vascular prostheses. J Vasc Surg 1984;1:829–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brothers TE, Graham LM, Till GO. Systemic effects of prosthetic vascular graft implantation. Surgery 1988;104:375–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Mol van Otterloo JCA, Van Brockel JH, Ponfoort ED, et al. Systemic effects of collagen-impregnated aortoiliac Dacron vascular prostheses on platelet activation and fibrin formation. J Vasc Surg 1991;14:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shoenfeld NA, Connolly R, Ramberg K, et al. The systemic activation of platelets by Dacron grafts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:454–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roizen MF, Rogers GM, Valone FH, et al. Anaphylactoid reactions to vascular graft material presenting with vasodilation and subsequent disseminated intravascular coagulation. Anesthesiology 1989;71:331–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Durham JR, Malone JM, Bernhard VM. The impact of multiple operations on the importance of arterial cultures. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:160–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bandyk DF. Vascular graft infections: Epidemiology, micro-biology, pathogenesis, and prevention. In Bernhard VM, Towne JB, eds. Complications in Vascular Surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1991, pp 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mikati A, Marache P, Watel A, et al. End-to-side aortoprosthetic anastomoses: Long-term computed tomography assessment. Ann Vasc Surg 1990;4:584–591.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1501 North Campbell Ave., 85724, Tucson, AZ

    Luke S. Erdoes MD, Scott S. Berman MD, Victor M. Bernhard MD & Glenn C. Hunter MD

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, Portland, Ore.

    Luke S. Erdoes MD & Maureen Mulcahy MD

Authors
  1. Luke S. Erdoes MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Scott S. Berman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victor M. Bernhard MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maureen Mulcahy MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Glenn C. Hunter MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We thank Drs. Charles Pratt and Margaret Montana for their assistance with data collection and Dr. Kenneth McIntyre for allowing us to use some of his patients for this project.

About this article

Cite this article

Erdoes, L.S., Berman, S.S., Bernhard, V.M. et al. Clinical and CT evaluation of a new stretch polytetrafluoroethylene aortic graft. Annals of Vascular Surgery 9, 441–447 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143857

Keywords

Search

Navigation