Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interspecific diversity and uniformity of flower colour patterns as cues for learned discrimination and innate detection of flowers

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The colour patterns of angiosperm flowers visited by bees and hoverflies were shown to provide a dual signalling system, giving the flower-visitors visual orientation cues for the initial detection of flowers, as well as for learned discrimination. Pollinators show an innate response to interspecifically uniform colour signals, which enable them to detect flowers and to orient towards the site of reward. Interspecifically diverse colour signals provide pollinators with cues for learned discrimination between flowers of different species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sprengel, C. K., Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Blumen. Viehweg, Berlin 1793. Reprint Cramer, Lehre 1972.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. von Frisch, K., Zool. Jb. Physiol. Tiere35 (1915) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ilse, D., Nature163 (1949) 255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lunau, K., Zool. Jb. Physiol.92 (1988) 487.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heinrich, B., Ecol. Monogr.46 (1976) 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinrich, B., Ecology60 (1979) 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haslett, J. R., Oecologia78 (1989) 433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chittka, L., and Menzel, R., J. comp. Physiol. A171 (1992) 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peitsch, D., Fietz, A., Hertel, H., de Souza, J., Ventura, D. F., and Menzel, R., J. comp. Physiol. A170 (1992) 23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Waser, N. M., Am. Nat.127 (1988) 593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lunau, K., Eur. J. Neurosci., Suppl.5 (1992) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lunau, K., J. comp. Physiol. A166 (1990) 827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lunau, K., Ethology88 (1991) 203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lunau, K., Can. J. Zool.70 (1992) 2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lunau, K., Biol. unserer Zeit23 (1993) 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Menzel, R., Z. vergl. Physiol.56 (1967) 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. von Helversen, O., J. comp. Physiol.80 (1972) 439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnetter, B., Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum Lernverhalten der Bienen und Hummeln unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Blütenstetigkeit. Diss. Univ. Würzburg, 1979.

  19. Menzel, R., and Smida, A., Biol. Rev.68 (1993) 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wacht, S., and Lunau, K., Proc. German zool. Soc.86 (1993) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Henderson, S. T., Daylight and its spectrum. Adam Hilger Ltd., London 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neumeyer, C., J. comp. Physiol.139 (1980) 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Backhaus, W., and Menzel, R., Biol. Cybern.55 (1987) 321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Backhaus, W., Neurosci. biobehav. Rev.16 (1990) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Daumer, K., Z. vergl. Physiol.41 (1958) 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lunau, K., Pl. Syst. Evol.183 (1992) 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kevan, P. G., in: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology: Floral colors through the insect eye: what they are and what they mean, p. 3. Eds C. E. Jones and R. J. Little. Van Nostrand Reinold, New York 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osche, G., Biol. unserer Zeit9 (1979) 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Osche, G., Ber. dt. bot. Ges.96 (1983) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kugler, H., Planta59 (1963) 296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kugler, H., Ber. dt. bot. Ges.79 (1966) 57.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guldberg, L. D., and Atsatt, P. R., Am. Midl. Nat.93 (1975) 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Horovitz, A., and Cohen, Y., Am. J. Bot.59 (1972) 706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ornduff, R., and Mosquin, T., Can. J. Bot.48 (1970) 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Utech, F. H., and Kawano, S., Bot. Mag., Tokyo88 (1975) 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosen, D., and Barthlott, W., Decheniana144 (1991) 72.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silberglied, R. E., A. Rev. ecol. Syst.10, (1979) 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Menzel, R., Farbensehen blütenbesuchender Insekten, p. 1. Ed. Internationales Büro der Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH, Jülich 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Huth, H. H., and Burkhardt, D., Naturwissenschaffen59 (1972) 650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goldsmith, T. H., Science207, (1980) 786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goldsmith, T. H., and Goldsmith, K. M., J. comp. Physiol.130 (1979) 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Exner, F., and Exner, S., Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl.119, Abt. 1 (1919) 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Zoologie, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93040, Regensburg, Germany

    K. Lunau

Authors
  1. K. Lunau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lunau, K. Interspecific diversity and uniformity of flower colour patterns as cues for learned discrimination and innate detection of flowers. Experientia 49, 1002–1010 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125649

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125649

Key words

Search

Navigation