Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating treatment effects in single-subject behavioral experiments using quality-control charts

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality-control charts can be particularly useful in identifying treatment effects and patterns of behaviors in single-subject behavior-analytic experiments that cannot be determined by visual inspection of their graphs. Using an example from the behavior analysis literature the quality-control charts identified the presence of treatment effects across phases as well as the presence of trends within and between phases. The ease of their calculations suggest use of them by behavior analysts whenever the effects of particular interventions are questionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. W., & Hart, T. H. (1986).Statistical process control: A guide for implementation. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulcutt, R. (1991).Statistics in research and development. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1986).Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A. J. (1986).Quality control and industrial statistics. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, M. J., & Wampold, B. E. (1982). Intervention effects and relative variation as dimensions in experts' use of visual inference.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantula, D. A. (1995). Disciplined decision in an interdisciplinary environment: Some implications for clinical applications of statistical process control.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 371–377.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. L. (1995). Applied behavior analysis and statistical process control?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 379–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. R., Weinrott, M. R., & Vaught, R. S. (1978). Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, D. M., Leonard, B. R., Vernon, S., Dugan, E. P., Delquadri, J. C., Gershon, B., Wade, L., & Folk, L. (1992). Teaching social skills to students with autism to increase peer interactions in an integrated first-grade classroom.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 281–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982).Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1984). Statistical analyses for single-case experimental designs. In D. H. Barlow & M. Hersen,Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., & Brody, G. H. (1978). A perspective on the controversy over employing statistical inference and implications for research and training in behavior modification.Behavior Modification, 2, 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, A. S., & Mainstone, L. E. (1987). Obstacles to understanding and using statistical process control as a productivity improvement approach.Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainstone, L. E. & Levi, A. S. (1987). Fundamentals of statistical process control.Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (1985).Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990a). Visual inspection of single-subject data: An empirical analysis.Mental Retardation, 28, 283–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990b). When is a picture worth a thousand p values? A comparison of visual and quantitative methods to analyze single subject data.Journal of Special Education, 23, 436–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottenbacher, K. J., & Cusick, A. (1991). An empirical investigation of interrater agreement for single-subject data using graphs with and without trend lines.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1978). The analysis and presentation of graphic data. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.),Single-subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 101–165). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1986). The graphic analysis of data. In A. Poling & R. W. Fugua (Eds.),Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances (pp. 157–186). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.),Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for Psychology and education (pp. 15–40). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfadt, A., Cohen, I. L., Sudhalter, V., Romanczyk, R. G., & Wheeler, D. J. (1992). Applying statistical process control to clinical data: An illustration.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 551–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfadt, A., Wheeler, D. J. (1995). Using statistical process control to make data-based clinical decisions.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 349–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. P. (1989).Statistical methods for quality improvement. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. R., & Saunders, J. L. (1994). W. Edwards Deming, quality analysis, and total behavior management.The Behavior Analyst, 17, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, C. (1986). Fallibility in the visual assessment of behavioural interventions: Time-series statistics to analyze time-series data.Behaviour Change, 3, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W. A., & Deming, W. E. (1939).Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. Pennsylvania, PA: Lancaster press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, H. M., Stephens, K. S., & Godfrey, A. B. (1986).Modem methods for quality control and improvement. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Furlong, M. J. (1981). The heuristics of visual inference.Behavioral Assessment, 3, 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Worsham, N. L. (1986). Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs.Behavioral Assessment, 8, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. J., & Chambers, D. S. (1992).Understanding statistical process control. Knoxville, TN: SPC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sideridis, G.D., Greenwood, C.R. Evaluating treatment effects in single-subject behavioral experiments using quality-control charts. J Behav Educ 6, 203–211 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110233

Key words

Navigation