Skip to main content
Log in

Progress and cumulation in the human sciences after the fall

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

What do we mean by progress and cumulation in the social and human sciences? Recent thinking in the philosophy and history of science has led to an abandonment of some versions of logical positivism and of verificationism that had a strong deductive and theory testing orientation. What is to replace them is less clear. This paper argues that progress and cumulation can be seen as a process of evaluation and retention within an epistemic community. Scholarly disciplines differ in their social structure and in their epistemic and normative commitments. Since sociology is a fragmented discipline, progress and cumulation differ within its multiple subdisciplines, which to varying extents represent epistemic communities. Brief sketches of progress (advance) and cumulation in several subdisciplines are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Andrew 1994 “History and sociology: The lost synthesis.” In E. Monkkonen (ed.), Engaging the Past: The Uses of History Across the Social Sciences: 77–112. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard andGary A. Steiner 1964 Human Behavior: An Inventory of Scientific Findings. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald 1969 “Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish scale nodel of omniscience.” In M. Sherif (ed.), Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences: 328–348. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Stephen 1992 Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994 “Why sociology doesn't make progress like the natural sciences.” Sociological Forum 9:133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D'Andrade, Roy 1985 “Three scientific world views and the covering law model.” In D. W. Fiske and R. A. Shweder (eds.), Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities: 19–41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, Paul andJohn Heritage, eds. 1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, John 1993 The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwig 1935/1979 Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony 1978 “Positivism and its critics.” In T. Bottomore and R. Nesbit (eds.), A History of Sociological Analysis: 237–286. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. Nigel andMichael Mulkay 1984 Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian 1984 “Five parables.” In R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy: 103–124. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, John 1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul 1993 World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip 1993 The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas 1977 The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry 1977 Progress and its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Christopher 1993 The Structures of History. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst 1982 The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Donald N. 1985 The Rhetorics of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry 1979 The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of Research. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon, andCedric Herring 1987 “Theory and research in social movements: A critical review.” In Samuel Long (ed.), Political Behavior Annual. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur 1965 The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, Melvin 1991 “Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity.” American Sociological Review 56: 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox andRichard A. Cloward 1991 “Collective protest: A critique of resource mobilization theory.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 4:435–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Samuel 1993 “The contours of demography: Estimates and projections.” Demography 30:593–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard 1980 Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph 1987 Knowledge and Power: Towards a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 “Narrative Reconstruction of Science,” Inquiry 33:179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 “Philosophy of Science and the Persistant Narratives of Modernity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22:141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, E. H. Stephens, andJ. D. Stephens 1992 Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, James B. 1988 Theories of Civil Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994 “Dilemmas of theoretical progress.” Sociological Forum 9:241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, Dudley 1984 “Reason and the Search for Knowledge: Investigations in the Philosophy of Science.” Vol. 78 in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dennis 1991 The Rise of Historical Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, Margaret forthcoming “Where is social theory after the historic turn? Knowledge cultures and historical epistemologies in social analysis.” In T. McDonald (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Social Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur 1994 “Disintegrated disciplines and the future of sociology.” Sociological Forum 9:279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles 1971 “Interpretation and the sciences of man.” Review of Metaphysics 25: 1. Reprinted in P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader: 25–72. (1979). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Jonathan andStephen Turner 1990 The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard 1984 The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer N. 1991 “Sociology as a discipline: Quasi-science and quasi-humanities.” American Sociologist 22, 165–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 “Looking backward to look forward: Reflections on the past and future of the resource mobilization research program.” In A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller, (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory: 326–350. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetterberg, Hans L. 1963 On Theory and Verification in Sociology. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zald, M.N. Progress and cumulation in the human sciences after the fall. Sociol Forum 10, 455–479 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095830

Key words

Navigation