Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a method for characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. This characterization is supported by a new boundary typology, that takes into account points where three or more landcovers converge (i.e., convergency points or coverts). Landscape boundary richness and diversity indices were proposed and calculated over 19 landscapes in South-East Brazil. Results showed that landscape boundaries, especially convergency points, provided an enrichment in landscape pattern analysis. Landcover boundary diversities were significantly related to landcover shape: elongated riparian units had the highest values for boundary diversity and coverts proportion indices. On the other hand, landscape analysis showed that indices of shape, richness, diversity and coverts proportion provided an additional evaluation of landcover spatial distribution within the landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrough, P.A. 1981. Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Décamps, H. and Tabacchi, E. 1994. Species richness in vegetation along river margins.In Aquatic ecology: scale, pattern and process, pp. 1–20. Edited by P.S. Giller, A.G. Hildrew and D.G. Raffaelli. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31: 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. Wiley and Sons Ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J. 1994. Edge detection algorithms for two-dimensional ecological data. Ecology 75: 956–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, J.E. and Gysel, L.W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giometti, A.L.B.R. 1993. Contribuição ao diagnóstico e macro-zoneamento da bacia hidrográfica do rio Jacaré-Pepira-SP. Master thesis, State University of São Paulo, Rio Claro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. and di Castri, F. 1992. Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment book series, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.D. and Kangas, P. 1979. Designing future landscapes from principles of form and function.In Our National Landscape, Techniques for Analysing and Management of Visual Resources, pp. 725–729. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. Agric., Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M.M. (Compiler). 1988. SCOPE/MAB Technical consultations on landscape boundaries. Report of a SCOPE/ MAB workshop on ecotones.In A new look at ecotones. Emerging international projects on landscape boundaries, pp. 47–106. Edited by A.F. di Castri, A.J. Hansen and M.M. Holland. Biology International, Special Issue 17, IUBS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M.M., Risser, P.G. and Naiman, R.J. (Eds.). 1991. Ecotones. The role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments. Chapman and Hall, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C.A. and Bonde, J. 1989. Quantitative analysis of ecotones using a Geographic Information System. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 55: 1643–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C.A., Pastor, J. and Pinay, G. 1991. Quantitative methods for studying landscape boundaries.In Landscape boundaries. Ecological studies, pp. 107–125. Edited by A.J. Hansen and A.F. di Castri. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGro, Jr. J. 1991. Assessing patch shape in landscape mosaics. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 57: 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and Reynolds, J.F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J. and Spies, T.A. 1993. Developing alternative forest cutting patterns: a simulation approach. Landscape Ecology 8: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T.E., Bierregaard, Jr. R.O., Rylands, A.B., Malcolm, J.R., Quintela, C.E., Harper, L.H., Brown, Jr. K.S., Powell, A.H., Powell, G.V.N., Schubert, H.O.R. and Hays, M.H. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments.In Conservation Biology: The science of scarcity and extinction, pp. 257–285. Edited by M.E. Soulé. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, M.H. 1983. Geoecologia, hidrografia, hidroquímica, clima e processos antrópicos da bacia do rio Jacaré-Pepira (SP). Ph.D. thesis, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink, A.M.J. 1985. Geo information systems for land use zoning and watershed management. ITC Journal 1985-4: 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R.J., Décamps, H., Pastor, J. and Johnston, C. 1988. The potential importance of boundaries to fluvial ecosystems. J. N. Benthol. Soc. 7: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R.J. and Décamps, H. (Eds.) 1990. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. Parthenon, Carnforth and UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, E.R., Ramsey, R.D. and Winn, D.S. 1993. A modified fractal dimension as a measure of landscape diversity. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 59: 1517–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinay, G. and Décamps, H. 1988. The role of riparian woods in regulating nitrogen fluxes between the alluvial aquifer and surface water: a conceptual model. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 2: 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W.H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs 52: 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, J. 1982. Image analysis and mathematic morphology. Academic press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A.M. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 38: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi, E. 1995. Structural variability and invasions of pioneer plants community in riparian habitats of the Middle Adour River. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. and Ruscher, C.L. 1988. Changes in the spatial patterns of land use in Georgia. Landscape Ecology 1: 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W.S. 1990. Accuracy and small-format surveys: the influence of scale and object definition on photo measurements. ITC Journal 1990–1: 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Crawford, C.S. and Gosz, J.R. 1985. Boundaries dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Horne, B. Van and Ims, R.A. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer, W.C. 1993. Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Landscape Ecology 8: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metzger, J.P., Muller, E. Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. Landscape Ecol 11, 65–77 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093740

Keywords

Navigation