Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Incontinence and rectal prolapse: A prospective manometric study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

A prospective, manometric study has been performed on 23 female patients with rectal prolapse and varying degrees of incontinence. Seven of the 14 incontinent patients regained continence after surgery, and a further two patients improved. Improvement in internal and external sphincter function follows correction of rectal prolapse. Preoperative resting anal pressure was significantly higher in continent patients than in incontinent patients (P < 0.05), as was the maximum voluntary contraction pressure (P < 0.027). Postoperatively there was a significant increase in the resting anal pressure (P < 0.0001) and maximum voluntary contraction pressure (P < 0.003)in the whole group. The preoperative resting anorectal angle was significantly more acute (P < 0.028) in continent patients than in incontinent patients. There was no significant change in the resting anorectal angle following prolapse repair. Patients who remained incontinent had a significantly lower preoperative resting anal pressure (P < 0.01) than patients who improved or regained continence. Similarly, maximum voluntary contraction pressure was lower preoperatively in these patients (P < 0.02). Preoperative resting anal pressure below 10 mm Hg and maximum voluntary contraction pressure below 50 mm Hg are associated with persisting incontinence after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S. The management of procidentia: 30 years' experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:96–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goligher JC. Rectal prolapse. In: Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed. London: Baillière Tindall, 1983:246–84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lowry AC, Goldberg SM. Internal and overt rectal procidentia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1987; 16: 47–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan NM, Porter NH, Klugman DJ. Ivalon (polyvinyl alcohol) sponge in the repair of complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1972;59:841–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Failes D, Killingback M, Stuart M, De Luca C. Rectal prolapse. Aust N Z J Surg 1979;49:72–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ripstein CB. Symposium: procidentia of the rectum: internal intussusception of the rectum (stage I rectal prolapse). Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:458–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman MJ, Kodner IJ, Fry RD. Internal intussusception of the rectum: diagnosis and surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:435–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuijpers HC, Schreve RH, ten Cate Hoedemakers H. Diagnosis of functional disorders of defecation causing the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:126–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schweiger M, Alexander Williams J. Solitary-ulcer syndrome of the rectum: its association with occult rectal prolapse. Lancet 1977;1:170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ihre T, Seligson U. Intussusception of the rectum— internal procidentia: treatment and results in 90 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:391–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experiences of ivalonsponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Mark's Hospital, 1960–1970. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holmström B, Ahlberg J, Bergstrand O, Brodén G, Ewerth S. Results of the treatment of rectal prolapse operated according to Ripstein. Acta Chir Scand 1978;(Suppl.)482:51–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Launer DP, Fazio VW, Weakley FL, Turnbull RB Jr, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC. The Ripstein procedure: a 16-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:41–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse: a 10-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:96–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson JR, Wilson BG, Parks TG. Complete rectal prolapse—the results of Ivalon sponge rectopexy. Postgrad Med J 1984;60:411–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johansson C, Ihre T, Ahlbäck SO. Disturbances in the defecation mechanism with special reference to intussusception of the rectum (internal procidentia). Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:920–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlinkert RT, Beart RW Jr., Wolff BG, Pemberton JH. Anterior resection for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:409–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mann CV, Hoffman C. Complete rectal prolapse: the anatomical and functional results of treatment by an extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988;75: 34–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Husa A, Sainio P, v. Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:221–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshioka K, Heyen F, Keighley MR. Functional results after posterior abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:835–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1989;158:574–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Porter NH. A physiological study of the pelvic floor in rectal prolapse. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1962;31:379–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmström B, Brodén G, Dolk A, Frenckner B. Increased anal resting pressure following the Ripstein operation: a contribution to continence? Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:485–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977;18:656–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiological studies of the anal sphincter musculature in faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:531–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985;26:470–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frenckner B, Ihre T. Function of the anal sphincters in patients with intussusception of the rectum. Gut 1976;17:147–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M, Auvunen O, Hietanen P. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1986;151:489–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V. Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1988;155:206–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Keighley MR, Makuria T, Alexander Williams J, Arabi Y. Clinical and manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and incontinence. Br J Surg 1980;67:54–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Matheson DM, Keighley MR. Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Gut 1981;22:126–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Duthie HL, Watts JM. Contribution of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone in the anal canal. Gut 1965;6:64–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frenkner B, Euler CV. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 1975;16:482–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Keighley MR, Shouler PJ. Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984;71:892–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brodén G, Dolk A, Holmström B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement. Int J Color Dis 1988;3:23–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander Williams J, Keighley MR. Sutured posterior rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1990;77:143–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Parameters which will identify patients who are likely to remain incontinent after abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1989;76:637.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR. Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg 1989;76:64–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Mayo Building, 420 Delaware Street S. E., Box 450, 55455, Minneapolis, Minnesota

    J. Graham Williams M.Ch., F.R.C.S. (Engl), W. Douglas Wong M.D., Linda Jensen R.N.,  David A. Rothenberger M.D. & Stanley M. Goldberg M.D., F.A.C.S.

Authors
  1. J. Graham Williams M.Ch., F.R.C.S. (Engl)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Douglas Wong M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Jensen R.N.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David A. Rothenberger M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stanley M. Goldberg M.D., F.A.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, J.G., Wong, W.D., Jensen, L. et al. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: A prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 209–216 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02090159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02090159

Key words

Search

Navigation