Skip to main content
Log in

Composite alternatives in group decision support

  • Section V Procedural And Algorithmic Aspects Of Group Decision Making
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision theory models of group decision processes usually assume a given set of alternatives, from which the group has to choose. In realistic group decision situations, however, alternatives are often not specified a priori, but are created during the group process from different components introduced by the group members. This paper develops methods for systematically creating such “composite alternatives”, also taking into account the necessity to keep both the computational effort and the cognitive load to group members within reasonable limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Abonyi, Filtering: An approach to generating the information base for collective choice, Manag. Sci. 29(1983)409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bronisz, K. Krus and A.P. Wierzbicki, Towards interactive solutions in a bargaining problem, in:Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems, ed. A. Lewandowski and A.P. Wierzbicki (Springer, Berlin, 1989) pp. 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.X. Bui, N.A.I.: A consensus seeking algorithm for group decision support systems, in:Proc. 1985 Int. Conf. on Cybernetics and Society, Tucson, AZ (1985) pp. 380–384.

  4. T.X. Bui,Co-oP — A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. DeSanctis and R.B. Gallupe, A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Manag. Sci. 33(1987)589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Habenicht, Quad Trees, a datastructure for discrete vector optimization problems, in:Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, ed. P. Hansen (Springer, Berlin, 1983) pp. 136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.-L. Hwang and M.J. Lin,Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria — Methods and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon,Multiple Attribute Decision Making — Methods and Applications. A State of the Art Survey (Springer, Berlin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Isermann, Investment and financial planning in a general partnership, in:Interactive Decision Analysis, ed. M. Grauer and A.P. Wierzbicki, Proceedings, Laxenburg, 1983 (Springer, Berlin, 1984) pp. 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Iz, Two multiple criteria group decision support systems based on mathematical programming and ranking methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 61(1992)245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Jacquet-Lagréze, Basic concepts for multicriteria decision support, in:Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications, ed. G. Fandel and J. Spronk (Springer, Berlin, 1985) pp. 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Jarke, Knowledge sharing and negotiation support in multiperson decision support systems, Dec. Support Syst. 2(1986)93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.T. Jelassi and A. Foroughi, Negotiation support systems: An overview of design issues and existing software, Dec. Support Syst. 5(1989)167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.W.M. John,Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments (Macmillan, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.E. Kersten, W. Michalowski, S. Szpakowicz and Z. Koperczak, Restructurable representations of negotiation, Manag. Sci. 37(1991)1269–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Lewandowski, S. Johnson and A.P. Wierzbicki, A prototype selection committee decision analysis and support system. SCDAS: Theoretical background and computer implementation, in:Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Vol. 2, ed. Y. Sawaragi, K. Inoue and H. Nakayama (Springer, Berlin, 1987) pp. 358–365.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Matwin, S. Szpakowicz, Z. Koperczak, G. Kersten and W. Michalowski, NegoPlan: An expert system shell for negotiation support, IEEE Expert 50–62(1989).

  18. B. Roy, The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory Dec. 31(1991)49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T.L. Saaty, Resolution of retributive conflicts, in:Operational Research '87, ed. G.K. Rand (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1987) pp. 549–565.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Stam and L.R. Gardiner, A multiple objective marketing-manufacturing approach for order (market) selection, Comp. Oper. Res. 19(1992)571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.E. Steuer,Multiple Criteria Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.E. Steuer and F.W. Harris, Intra-set point generation and filtering in decision and criterion space, Comp. Oper. Res. 7(1980)41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Vetschera, Group decision and negotiation support — A methodological survey, OR Spektrum 12(1990)67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Vetschera,Entscheidungsunterstützende Systeme für Gruppen, Physica-Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaft (Physica, Heidelberg, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Vetschera, GDSS-X: An experimental group decision support system for program planning, in:Multiple Criteria Decision Support, ed. P. Korhonen, A. Lewandowski and J. Wallenius (Springer, Berlin, 1991) pp. 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Vincke,Multicriteria Decision-aid (Wiley, Chichester, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vetschera, R. Composite alternatives in group decision support. Ann Oper Res 51, 195–215 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02078896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02078896

Keywords

Navigation