Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may develop impaired evacuation of the pouch. A new surgical approach and the role of dynamic defecography in such patients are highlighted. METHODS: Five patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were assessed clinically and with dynamic defecography before and after reoperation. RESULTS: In one patient an extensive approach with complete pouch mobilization, stenoplasty of a pouch outlet stenosis, shortening of the rectal remnant, and renewed pouch-anal anastomosis were needed; in three patients, a long and angulated efferent limb was shortened by transabdominal techniques (stenoplasty or a newly developed technique with a linear stapler), and in one patient a pouch inlet stenosis was corrected. In all patients, impaired emptying was cured; in all patients, obstructive abdominal pain improved considerably. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic defecography is indispensable for tailoring surgical treatment. Effective transabdominal shortening of the efferent limb can be performed with the aid of a linear stapler.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Galandiuk S, Scott NA, Dozois RR,et al. Ileal pouchanal anastomosis: reoperation for pouch-related complications. Ann Surg 1990;212:446–52.
Nicholls RJ, Gilbert JM. Surgical correction of the efferent ileal limb for disordered defaecation following restorative proctocolectomy with the S ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1990;77:152–4.
Liljeqvist L, Lindquist K. A reconstructive operation on malfunctioning S-shaped pelvic reservoirs. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:506–11.
Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Faecal continence and defaecation. In: Henry MM, Swash M, eds. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. 2nd ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992:86–97.
Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Can the pouch be saved? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:671–5.
Becker JM, McGrath KM, Meagher MP, Parodi JE, Dunnegan DA, Soper NJ. Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery 1991;110:718–24.
Silvis R, van Eekelen JW, Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG. Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: relation with anal manometry and fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:383–8.
Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V, Oakley J, Church J, Milsom J. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 1991;161:90–5.
Delemarre JB. Can (neo)rectal evacuation disorders be treated surgically in inflammatory bowel disease? Neth J Med 1994;45:76–9.
Lindquist K, Liljeqvist L, Sellberg B. The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relation to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:573–9.
Pescatori M, Manhire A, Bartram CI. Evacuation pouchography in the evaluation of ileoanal reservoir function. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:365–8.
Fonkalsrud EW, Phillips JD. Reconstruction of malfunctioning ileoanal pouch procedures as an alternative to permanent ileostomy. Am J Surg 1990;160:245–51.
Broden B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968;11:330–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Silvis, R., Delemarre, J.B.V.M. & Gooszen, H.G. Surgical treatment and role of dynamic defecography in impaired evacuation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 84–88 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055687
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055687