Abstract
Continent ileostomies are performed in patients who are not candidates for or do not want a traditional J-pouch after total colectomy. In these cases, patients may opt for a type of continent ileostomy instead of an end ileostomy. The most common types of continent ileostomies include the Kock (K) pouch, S-pouch and Barnett Continent Intestinal Reservoir. The normal fluoroscopic and CT appearance of these types of continent ileostomies are reviewed. CT provides better evaluation of the proximal small bowel and pouch for inflammatory bowel disease, while fluoroscopy is superior in evaluating the nipple valve. Common complications of these types of continent ileostomies are discussed including slipped nipple valve, pouch inflammation, fistulas, and polyps. Radiologist should be familiar with the different types of continent ileostomies that exist and their common complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability to data/materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Nessar G, Wu JS (2012) Evolution of continent ileostomy. World J Gastroenterol 18:3479-3482. doi:https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3479
Angistriotis A, Shen B, Kiran RP (2022) Construction of and Conversion to Continent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002631
Deputy M, Worley G, Patel K, Fletcher J, Hart A, Block M, Oresland T, Myrelid P, Faiz O (2021) Long-term outcome and quality of life after continent ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. Colorectal Dis 23:2286-2299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15788
Beck DE (2008) Continent ileostomy: current status. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:62-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1055323
Stephens DH, Mantell BE, Kelly KA (1979) Radiology of the continent ileostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 132:717-721. doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.132.5.717
Simillis C, Afxentiou T, Pellino G, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Faiz O, Tekkis PP (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing adverse events and functional outcomes of different pouch designs after restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 20:664-675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14104
Parc Y, Klouche M, Bennis M, Lefevre JH, Shields C, Tiret E (2011) The continent ileostomy: an alternative to end ileostomy? Short and long-term results of a single institution series. Dig Liver Dis 43:779-783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.05.017
Wu XR, Ke HX, Kiran RP, Shen B, Lan P (2020) Continent Ileostomy as an Alternative to End Ileostomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020:9740980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9740980
Ecker KW (1999) Die kontinente Ileostomie Gegenwärtige Indikationen, Vorgehensweisen und Ergebnisse. Chirurg 70:635-642
Ecker KW, Tonsmann M, Ecker NKJ, Moslein G (2022) Salvage surgery for continent ileostomies (CI) after a first successful revision: more long-term blame on the reservoir than the nipple valve. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:553-561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04054-x
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Desiree Lanzino Ph.D., Lucy Bahn Ph.D. and Sonia Watson Ph.D. in editing the manuscript.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Flicek, K.T., Shawki, S.F. Continent ileostomies: what the radiologist needs to know. Abdom Radiol 48, 2969–2977 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03705-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03705-z